BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   June 27, 2016


                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES


                                 Das Williams, Chair


          SB  
          888 (Allen) - As Amended May 31, 2016


          SENATE VOTE:  28-10


          SUBJECT:  Gas corporations:  emergency management


          SUMMARY:  Establishes the California Office of Emergency  
          Services (Cal OES) as the lead agency for emergency response to  
          a leak of natural gas from a natural gas storage facility.  
          Specifies how penalty money assessed against a gas corporation  
          for a gas storage leak should be spent. 


          EXISTING LAW:   


          1)Creates Cal OES, within the Office of the Governor, which  
            coordinates disaster response, emergency planning, emergency  
            preparedness, disaster recovery, disaster mitigation, and  
            homeland security activities.



          2)Requires the handler of hazardous material to immediately  
            report any release or threatened release of a hazardous  
            material to the unified program agency and to Cal OES.








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  2








          3)Directs the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to monitor  
            and regulate sources of emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs)  
            that cause global warming in order to reduce GHG emissions to  
            1990 levels by 2020.  



          4)Authorizes the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)  
            to fix rates, establish rules, examine records, issue  
            subpoenas, administer oaths, take testimony, punish for  
            contempt, and prescribe a uniform system of accounts for all  
            public utilities, including electrical and gas corporations,  
            subject to its jurisdiction. 

          5)Declares it is the policy of the state that the CPUC and each  
            gas corporation place safety of the public and gas corporation  
            employees as the top priority.  Requires CPUC to take all  
            reasonable and appropriate actions necessary to carry out the  
            safety priority policy of this paragraph consistent with the  
            principle of just and reasonable cost-based rates.


           


          6)Requires any public utility that violates or fails to comply  
            with any provision of the Constitution of this state or fails  
            or neglects to comply with any part or provision of any order,  
            decision, decree, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of  
            the CPUC, in a case in which a penalty has not otherwise been  
            provided, is subject to a penalty of not less than five  
            hundred dollars ($500), nor more than fifty thousand dollars  
            ($50,000) for each offense.
          7)Prohibits a gas corporation from recovering any fine or  
            penalty in any rate approved by the CPUC.  Requires that any  
            fine or penalty imposed by the CPUC and collected from a  








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  3





            public utility be paid to the General Fund.


          


          THIS BILL: 


          1)Establishes Cal OES as the lead agency for emergency response  
            to a large ongoing leak or release of natural gas and  
            associated gases from a natural gas storage facility that  
            poses a significant present or potential hazard to the public  
            health and safety, property, or to the environment. 


          2)Requires Cal OES to coordinate among other state and local  
            agencies the emergency response, public health and  
            environmental assessment, monitoring, and long-term management  
            and control of the leak.


          3)Creates the Gas Storage Facility Leak Mitigation Account  
            (Account) and requires CPUC to deposit any penalties assessed  
            against a gas corporation pursuant to a gas storage facility  
            leak into the Account. 


          4)Specifies that moneys in the Account shall be expended, upon  
            appropriation by the Legislature, subject to both of the  
            following conditions:


             a)   Requires money to be expended solely for direct  
               emissions reductions in furtherance of the achievement of  
               the GHG emissions limit established by the California  
               Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.  Prohibits moneys  
               from being used for the purchase of allowances or offsets.   
                








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  4







             b)   Requires moneys from penalties to be expended in a  
               manner that, at a minimum, achieves a reduction in GHGs  
               that equals the amount of those gases emitted by that leak,  
               as determined by ARB.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)Approximately $600 (including staffing and travel costs) for  
            CalOES to deploy an onsite coordinator.  This would be  
            recovered from the responsible party.



          2)Approximately $100,000 (Oil, Gas and Geothermal Administrative  
            Fund) for ARB to contract for downwind flights to characterize  
            the natural gas release rate at reasonable periodic intervals  
            using small planes with monitors to measure methane.



          3)Additional unknown, but potentially significant, redirection  
            of penalty revenue from the General Fund.

          COMMENTS:  


          1)Author's statement:
            


               The unprecedented natural gas leak at Southern  
               California Gas Company's Aliso Canyon storage field  
               has shed light on the lack of a meaningful State  
               response plan to such disasters. While the State's  








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  5





               response to the leak was swift, at least seven  
               different agencies have been involved with no  
               statutory single point of responsibility and  
               accountability to oversee efforts and remediation  
               actions.  Unlike oil spill response, which is dictated  
               by robust framework to streamline agency coordination  
               and collaboration, California lacks a plan to quickly  
               and efficiently address a massive natural gas leak. 





               In fact, while the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal  
               Resources (DOGGR) was notified of the leak right away,  
               the ARB said it wasn't notified of the leak until Nov.  
               5th. State officials might have more quickly  
               understood the severity of the leak if emissions had  
               been measured earlier. Further, a Unified Command  
               structure, similar to what is put in place following  
               significant oil spill, was not established until  
               January.





               Further, existing law would require the fines and  
               penalties assed by the CPUC to go directly to the  
               General Fund. While it is imperative that the Gas  
               Company fully mitigate the methane emissions from this  
               disaster to ensure we stay on track to meet our  
               climate goals, there is no statutory requirement that  
               they do. Using the fine and penalty money to mitigate  
               emissions ensures the mitigation happens and also  
               ensures that it is paid for using shareholder profits,  
               not ratepayers dollars.










                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  6








          2)Aliso Canyon Leak.  On October 23 2015, a natural gas storage  
            well, known as "SS-25" owned by Southern California Gas  
            (SoCalGas) and located in the Aliso Canyon storage field in  
            close proximity to the Porter Ranch neighborhood in Los  
            Angeles County began leaking natural gas.  The leak continued  
            until it was initially controlled on February 11, 2016, and  
            the well was successfully sealed on February 18, 2016.  During  
            the four months the well leaked, there were numerous attempts  
            to control it.  All attempts to stop the leak from the top of  
            the well failed.  A relief well was finally able to stop the  
            natural gas leak by plugging the leaking well at its base.   
            According to a recent study, the leak at Aliso Canyon was the  
            largest natural gas leak recorded in the United States,  
            doubling the methane emission rate of the entire Los Angeles  
            basin.  Methane is a potent GHG with a global warming  
            potential more than 80 times as powerful as carbon dioxide.  



            The South Coast Air Quality Management District has received  
            thousands of complaints regarding the odor.  Complaints by  
            residents suggest that mercaptans, which are odorants required  
            to be added to natural gas, have been present in Porter Ranch  
            at varying levels since the gas leak started.   Some people  
            may experience adverse health effects to the strong odors of  
            mercaptans, such as nausea and headaches.  In mid-November,  
            the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, citing  
            public health concerns associated with the use of odorants in  
            the natural gas, ordered SoCal Gas to provide temporary  
            housing relocation assistance to affected residents.  Over  
            8,000 households were relocated due to the leak.  Now that the  
            leak has been stopped, residents are returning home,  
            regulators are investigating the cause of the leak, and a  
            comprehensive safety review of the other 114 wells at the  
            field is in progress. 









                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  7









          3)Natural Gas Storage Facilities.  Natural gas providers inject  
            natural gas into large underground reservoirs for storage  
            before later withdrawing the gas for sale during peak load  
            periods.  These underground reservoirs often contained oil or  
            gas that has already been extracted.  Natural gas providers  
            utilize these natural gas storage facilities (Facilities) to  
            reduce the cost of procurement and to maintain adequate supply  
            of natural gas during peak times.  While the CPUC regulates  
            natural gas providers, natural gas transmission lines, and the  
            permitting of Facilities, it is DOGGR that regulates the wells  
            that natural gas is injected into and withdrawn from.  Gas  
            storage injection wells are the only type of injection wells  
            in DOGGR's UIC program that are not part of the primacy  
            agreement with United States Environmental Protection Agency  
            (US EPA).  DOGGR's UIC program regulates 14 active gas storage  
            facilities in 12 separate fields across the state to ensure  
            well construction and integrity, appropriateness of the  
            injection site, and zonal isolation of the injections.  Each  
            Facility may contain dozens of active gas storage wells.   
            There are 343 active and 85 idle natural gas storage wells in  
            the state.  Some natural gas storage facilities have been in  
            operation since the 1940s and approximately half of the active  
            wells are over 40 years old.  Natural gas storage wells vary  
            in construction, depth, design, age, location, and operating  
            conditions.  In Aliso Canyon, the wells were drilled in the  
            1940s for production purposes and then converted into storage  
            wells.  The wells at Aliso Canyon do not contain a cement  
            barrier along its entire length of the casing and have had a  
            history of well integrity issues.  



          4)State Actions.  On January 6, 2016, the Governor issued a  
            proclamation of a state of emergency, which directed several  
            state agencies to act in response to the Aliso Canyon gas  








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  8





            leak.  These actions included all of the following:
            


             a)   Direction to DOGGR to continue prohibiting all  
               injections into Aliso Canyon;



             b)   Direction to CPUC and California Energy Commission (CEC)  
               to reduce the pressure of the facility by withdrawing gas;



             c)   Directing ARB to require real-time monitoring of  
               emissions;



             d)   Direction to Office of Environmental Health Hazard  
               Assessment to review public health concerns, ensure energy  
               and natural gas reliability;



             e)   Direction to DOGGR to promulgate emergency regulations  
               to require new safety and reliability measures for  
               underground natural gas storage facilities; and,



             f)   Direction to DOGGR, CPUC, ARB, and CEC to assess the  
               long-term viability of natural gas storage facilities.



            The effort to address the leak required numerous state and  
            local entities to work together under the direction of CalOES.  
             On February 5, 2016, DOGGR established emergency regulations  








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  9





            to improve the regulation of gas storage wells.  The  
            regulations include the requirement that within six months  
            (August 6) after the regulations become effective, the  
            operator of a gas storage facility to submit a Risk Management  
            Plan to DOGGR to assess the integrity and risk associated with  
            their gas storage project.  DOGGR has yet to receive a risk  
            management plan from an operator.  DOGGR is working with  
            Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore  
            National Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratory on its  
            permanent regulations for gas storage wells. A draft of the  
            regulations is expected in July. 





          5)Penalties. The investigation of the Aliso Canyon leak and  
            SoCalGas is ongoing and it is unclear whether the CPUC will  
            pursue penalties.  If the CPUC did assess penalties against  
            SoCalGas or any other Facility for a leak, this bill would  
            direct the money into the newly created Account for GHG  
            reduction purposes rather than the General Fund.  However,  
            SoCalGas may face other legal or administrative actions  
            against it due to the leak.  DOGGR may pursue penalties based  
            on the leak being an unreasonable waste of natural gas.  The  
            leak did not violate AB 32 because it was an accidental  
            release.  ARB has proposed regulations to regulate future  
            leaks at Facilities under AB 32.  The Attorney General, ARB,  
            the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles have  
            filed suit against SoCalGas to mitigate the impacts of the  
            uncontrolled emission of a massive quantity of GHGs into the  
            environment and impose appropriate civil penalties as allowed  
            by law.  The parties seek equitable relief, civil penalties,  
            and attorney's fees.



          6)Mitigation.  On December 18, 2016, the CEO of SoCalGas sent a  
            letter to Governor Brown pledging to mitigate the environment  








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  10





            impact of the leak.  Governor Brown subsequently issued a  
            proclamation that directed ARB to prepare a program, to be  
            funded by SoCalGas, that will "fully mitigate the methane  
            emissions from the leak and prioritize reductions of  
            short-lived climate pollutants."  There has been disagreement  
            over how much emissions need to be mitigated, how quickly, and  
            whether the mitigation should happen in California and should  
            they prioritize short-lived climate pollutants.  It is unclear  
            whether the lawsuit mentioned above would be pursued if an  
            agreement was reached.  

          6)Double referral and amendments.  This bill was heard in the  
            Governmental Organization Committee on June 22, and passed  
            with a 16-2 vote.  Due to timing, amendments agreed to in the  
            Government Organization Committee will be adopted in this  
            Committee.  The amendments require the Account to allocate a  
            minimum of 25% of the available moneys to projects that  
            provide benefits to disadvantaged communities and 10% in those  
            communities.  Please see the Government Organization Committee  
            analysis for further information.  In addition to those  
            amendments, the author and committee may wish to consider  
            amending the bill to make expenditures from the Account  
            consistent with ARB's Aliso Canyon Climate Impacts Mitigation  
            Program.


          7)Related legislation.





          SB 380 (Pavley), Chapter 14, Statutes of 2016, sets in statute  
          criteria for testing and inspection of the natural gas storage  
          wells at the Aliso Canyon facility and required the CPUC and  
          others to study the feasibility of minimizing the use of or  
          shutting down the Aliso Canyon gas storage facility.










                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  11






          AB 1903 (Wilk, 2016) requires a long-term health impact study  
          from the Aliso Canyon gas leak, as specified.  This bill is  
          awaiting hearing in the Senate Environmental Quality Committee.



          AB 1905 (Wilk, 2016) requires the Natural Resources Agency, on  
          or before July 1, 2017, to complete an independent scientific  
          study on natural gas injection and storage practices and  
          facilities.  This bill was held on the suspense file in the  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee.  


          SB 887 (Pavley, 2016) provides a framework for reforming the  
          oversight of natural gas storage wells. This bill requires  
          continuous monitoring of natural gas storage wells, as well as  
          evaluation, testing, and installation of specified technology  
          and practices for operating natural gas storage wells.  This  
          bill is scheduled to be heard in this committee on June 27,  
          2016.


          














          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:








                                                                     SB 888


                                                                    Page  12









          Support




          South Coast Air Quality Management District




          Opposition


          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092