BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 897 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 22, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE Tom Daly, Chair SB 897 (Roth) - As Amended June 16, 2016 SENATE VOTE: 35-0 SUBJECT: Workers' compensation SUMMARY: Extends "4850" benefits for certain public safety officers for an additional year in the event of defined catastrophic injuries. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires local government agencies that employ certain peace officer and firefighter employees to pay up to two years of "4850" benefits in the event of a "catastrophic injury at the hands of another." 2)States that "catastrophic injury at the hands of another" includes severe burns, severe bodily injuries resulting from the collapse of a building, and severe bodily injuries resulting from a shooting or stabbing. 3)Specifies that the injury must have occurred during duty, and through the direct result of the actions of another. SB 897 Page 2 4)Provides, notwithstanding the "direct result of the actions of another" limitation, that qualifying injuries that result from active firefighting trigger the expanded benefit "without respect to the cause of the fire." 5)Provides that the two year period for which the expanded benefit is potentially available ends if the injured employee starts receiving a permanent disability pension. 6)Specifies that the expanded benefit applies to local police officers, sheriff's officers, and local firefighters. 7)Specifies that the bill does NOT apply to employees whose duties do not involve active law enforcement or active firefighting. 8)Provides that a leave authorized by the bill shall not be deemed by an employer to be family or medical leave. 9)Provides that the benefits authorized by the bill do not apply to employees of the City and County of San Francisco. 10)Specifies that the benefits authorized by the bill are temporary disability benefits subject to the time limitations in the Labor Code. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides for a comprehensive system of employer-paid benefits to be provided to employees who suffer illness or injury that SB 897 Page 3 arises out of, or in the course of, employment. 2)Includes temporary disability benefits (TD) for up to 104 weeks if an employee is temporarily unable to work during recuperation from the workplace illness or injury. 3)Establishes a minimum and a maximum amount that an employee may receive, which is adjusted annually to reflect rising wage levels. Currently the minimum benefit is $165 per week, and the maximum benefit is $1103. The benefit is calculated based on 2/3 of an employee's average weekly wages, subject to the maximum cap. 4)Provides specified public safety officers (most peace officer and firefighter employees of local governments and special districts) with an enhanced temporary disability benefit for up to the first year of temporary disability. These safety officers receive their full salary (tax free) during the first year of temporary disability (commonly referred to as "4850" benefits). FISCAL EFFECT: While Legislative Counsel did not key this bill fiscal, it would likely result in substantial increased disability costs to local governments that employ public safety employees who would benefit from the bill. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, constant medical advances allow greater opportunities for recovery from severe injuries, but often, it takes more than a year to fully recover. The author points to a Riverside Police Department officer, Andrew Tachias. Officer Tachias was seriously wounded, and his partner killed, by a disgruntled former police officer who went on a multi-county rampage in February or 2013. It took nearly 3 years before Officer Tachias was able to return to SB 897 Page 4 work, during which time his Department did, in fact, keep him on full pay leave. The bill is designed to ensure that all officers and firefighters who suffer similar catastrophic injuries are similarly treated. 2)Temporary disability benefits. The goal of TD is to approximate an employee's take home pay during the period after injury when the employee is temporarily unable to work. This goal is implemented by basing the weekly TD benefit on 2/3 of the employee's average weekly wages. Because there is a cap, employees who make more than approximately $1600 per week do not reach this 2/3 goal, but because the benefit is tax free, most employees receive an adequate TD benefit while they are recovering. 3)Special public safety benefits. Most public safety officers (peace officer, sheriff, and firefighter employees generally) receive certain special workers' compensation benefits that other employees do not receive. Most notably, this class of employee has the benefit of a range of "presumptions" that certain illnesses or injuries are automatically deemed to be work related. All other employees are required to prove that their condition is work related. The second significant special workers' compensation benefit is granted by Labor Code Sections 4800 through 4850 - commonly referred to as "4850 time" - and this law grants defined employees up to one year of full salary in lieu of the regular method for calculating TD benefits. 4)Tax advantages. Because these benefits are paid due to disability, they are not subject to either state or federal taxes. This applies to regular TD benefits, and to 4800-4850 benefits. Because of the tax-free status of this benefit, a public safety officer takes home substantially more in weekly benefits than they normally earn while working - i.e., normal take home pay plus what would have been paid in taxes. Public SB 897 Page 5 employers have long complained that this creates a disincentive in getting injured public safety officers to return to work, even if they are able, due to the financial loss they would suffer when they return. 5)Collective bargaining? If a public agency wants to grant employees certain benefits of employment, it is able to accomplish that goal without need for a statutory change. In fact, the City of Los Angeles has provided "4850-like" benefits to a range of employees without need of a statute mandating the benefit for those employees. By statute and by collective bargaining, some public safety officers have obtained enhanced TD benefits that equal their take home pay, irrespective of the statutory TD cap. Collective bargaining, and not legislation, may be the better approach to enhancing the benefits for this class of employee. 6)Benefit available in limited circumstances. Regular 4850 benefits (for local government public safety officer employees) are available to the defined class of public safety officers for any disabling injury that arises out of or in the course of employment (certain state public safety officer employees only receive 4850-like benefits when performing "active" law enforcement or firefighting duties). The expanded benefit proposed by the bill would only be triggered by certain severe injuries that occur as a result of defined causation. Thus, the peace officer who is injured in a common automobile accident would not be eligible for this expanded benefit, but a firefighter who suffers severe burns when the building that is on fire collapses on her would be eligible. 7)"Catastrophic injury". The goal of SB 897 is to provide an extra year of 4850 benefits to a narrow class of public safety officers for a narrow range of injuries. However, the bill provides that the catastrophic injury at the hands of another merely "includes" the listed injuries. The "includes" SB 897 Page 6 approach suggests that other, not listed, injuries would also trigger the expanded 4850 benefit. Unfortunately, absent legislative clarification, exactly what other injuries would suffice can only be resolved by litigation. 8)"At the hands of another". This qualifying phrase in the definitions portion of the bill applies to most of the covered injuries that could be suffered by peace officers. However, if the injury is the result of active firefighting duties, there is no requirement that the fire or other triggering circumstances be caused by another party. 9)Severe burns and bodily injuries. As noted by opponents, "severe" is a vague term that is not defined by the bill. The concern, similar to the concern about "includes," discussed above, is that it is impossible to know whether the bill is narrow or broad, because there is no clear definition of which injuries are sufficient to trigger the expanded 4850 benefit, and which are not. Only through litigation will these issues be resolved, and opponents fear, in addition to the expense of litigation, that the bill will end up covering a far broader scope of injuries than intended by the author. 10)Recent legislation. In recent years, the Assembly Insurance Committee has looked to the employing jurisdictions to support expansions of benefits for their local employees. The Committee has moved 4850 expansions where the local jurisdiction at issue was in support, but not where there was no local employer support. The three bills noted below all involved an expansion for employees of a specific local jurisdiction, as opposed to SB 897, which would apply to all local jurisdictions that employ peace officer or firefighter employees. SB 897 Page 7 In 2013, SB 527 (Block) was signed into law. SB 527 added lifeguards employed by the City of San Diego to the list of public safety employees entitled to 4850 time. Proponents of that bill argued that the San Diego lifeguards performed duties comparable to Los Angeles County lifeguards, who already have this benefit. The City of San Diego supported the bill. Last year, SB 559 (Block) proposed to add lifeguards employed by the City of Imperial Beach to the list of public safety employees entitled to 4850 benefits. The City did not support the bill, and it was held in the Assembly Insurance Committee. AB 1451 (Chavez) also sought to provide 4850 benefits to a class of lifeguards employed by the City of Oceanside, arguing that other lifeguards employed by San Diego and Los Angeles who performed comparable duties already receive this benefit. The City of Oceanside supported the bill. Governor Brown vetoed AB 1451. The veto message stated: "This bill adds full-time lifeguards employed by the City of Oceanside to the list of employees who are entitled up to one year of leave, paid at full salary without payroll tax deductions, if they suffer an illness or injury that arises out of their job duties. Recent data indicates public employers' costs related to this disability leave benefit have increased at an alarming rate. These cost figures give me pause to extend this benefit further in state law. If the City of Oceanside wishes to offer full salary in lieu of temporary disability for one year to their regular full-time lifeguards, they are free to do so by means of the collective bargaining process. Eligibility for this benefit is best left to the City of Oceanside, not the state, to determine." REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: SB 897 Page 8 Support Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs (AOCDS) Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District California Applicant's Attorney Association (CAAA) California Professional Firefighters (Sponsor) Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs (AOCDS) California School Employees Association (CSEA), AFL-CIO California Statewide Law Enforcement Association (CSLEA) Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Laborers International Union of North America Locals 777 & 792 LIUNA Locals 777 & 792 Long Beach Police Officers Association (LBPOA) Los Angles Count Professional Peace Officers Association Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631 SB 897 Page 9 Peace Officers Research Association of California Riverside Police Officers' Association (RPOA) Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Association (SCDSA) San Bernardino Police Officers Association Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Opposition Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District California Association of Joint Powers Authorities (CAJPA) California Coalition of Workers' Compensation (CCWC) SB 897 Page 10 California Insurance Pool Authority California Police Chiefs Association California Special Districts Association (CSDA) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) California State Association of Counties- Excess Insurance Authority California State Sheriffs' Association (CSSA) City of Anderson City of Buena Park City of Chino City of Fountain Valley City of Grover Beach City of Menifee City of Monrovia SB 897 Page 11 City of Montclair City of Newport Beach City of Plymouth City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Redding City of San Luis Obispo City of Santa Maria City of Torrance City of Ventura City of Villa Park City of Visalia CSAC Excess Insurance Authority (CSAC-EIA) League of California Cities (LCC) SB 897 Page 12 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Mayor and City Council of the City of Sacramento Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC) Analysis Prepared by:Mark Rakich / INS. / (916) 319-2086