BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          898 (Nguyen)


          As Amended  June 27, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  39-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Revenue &       |9-0  |Ridley-Thomas,        |                    |
          |Taxation        |     |Brough, Dababneh,     |                    |
          |                |     |Gipson, Mullin,       |                    |
          |                |     |O'Donnell, Patterson, |                    |
          |                |     |Quirk, Wagner         |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-3 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |Gallagher, Jones,   |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |Obernolte           |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Quirk,        |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,     |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood, Chau     |                    |








                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Establishes a sales and use tax (SUT) exemption for  
          animal whole blood, plasma, blood products, and blood  
          derivatives, sold by a "nonprofit" animal blood banking business  
          for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of  
          injury or disease in animals pursuant to Food and Agricultural  
          Code Section 9241.  Specifically, this bill:


          1)Defines "nonprofit" as an organization exempt from federal  
            income taxation as an organization described in Internal  
            Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3).  
          2)Provides that, notwithstanding existing law, the state shall  
            not reimburse cities and counties for any SUT revenues lost by  
            them under this bill.   


          3)Takes immediate effect as a tax levy. 


          4)Sunsets the exemption on January 1, 2022.  


          EXISTING LAW:   


          1)Imposes a sales tax on retailers for the privilege of selling  
            tangible personal property (TPP), absent a specific exemption.  
             The tax is based upon the retailer's gross receipts from TPP  
            sales in this state.


          2)Imposes a complimentary use tax on the storage, use, or other  
            consumption of TPP purchased out-of-state and brought into  
            California.  The use tax is imposed on the purchaser; and  








                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  3





            unless the purchaser pays the use tax to an out-of-state  
            retailer registered to collect California's use tax, the  
            purchaser remains liable for the tax.  The use tax is set at  
            the same rate as the state's sales tax and must generally be  
            remitted to the State Board of Equalization (BOE).


          3)Provides that human whole blood, plasma, blood products, and  
            blood derivatives, or any human body parts held in a bank for  
            medical purposes, are exempt from taxation for any purpose.   
            (Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 33). 


          4)Exempts from SUT any container used to collect or store human  
            whole blood, plasma, blood products, or blood derivatives that  
            are exempt from taxation under R&TC Section 33, including  
            blood collection units and blood pack units.  (R&TC Section  
            6364.5).  


          5)Prohibits any person from offering for sale or use any of the  
            following:


             a)   Any biologic unless it is manufactured pursuant to the  
               terms of a valid license or permit issued by the United  
               States Department of Agriculture; or, 
             b)   Any blood or blood component product unless it is  
               produced in a licensed establishment.  (Food and  
               Agricultural Code Section 9241).


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, annual state and local revenue loss of approximately  
          $80,000, including $38,400 in General Fund loss.


          COMMENTS:  









                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  4






          1)The author has provided the following statement in support of  
            this bill:


               Senate Bill 898 amends the California Revenue and  
               Taxation [C]ode to clarify that the sale and use of  
               animal blood, blood products, and derivatives by a  
               licensed CDFA-licensed nonprofit animal blood bank are  
               not subject to tax when sold for use in the cure,  
               mitigation, treatment or prevention of injury or disease  
               in animals.


               Animal blood banks serve an important role in saving the  
               lives of animals that are in need of surgical procedures.  
                Human blood banks, such as the American Red Cross, enjoy  
               a similar exemption, partly in recognition that human  
               blood banks help save lives.  This same exemption does  
               not apply to nonprofit animal blood banks. 


               SB 898 will help ensure that animal blood banks continue  
               to be treated under the law the same as human blood  
               banks.


          2)The BOE notes the following in its staff analysis of this  
            bill:


               This bill does not materially impact the BOE's tax audit  
               or administrative functions:  "Since this bill applies to  
               one nonprofit licensed animal blood bank that currently  
               exists in California, this bill would not materially  
               impact the BOE's administrative responsibilities."      


          3)Committee Staff Comments








                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  5







               What would this bill do?   This bill would provide a  
               complete SUT exemption for animal whole blood, plasma,  
               blood products, and blood derivatives, sold by a  
               nonprofit animal blood banking business for use in the  
               cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of injury or  
               disease in animals.  


               The BOE notes that, according to the California  
               Department of Food and Agriculture, there are two  
               California animal blood bank establishments with licenses  
               to produce, market, and sell animal blood and products.   
               These facilities provide whole blood, plasma, platelets,  
               and clotting factors to veterinary hospitals and clinics.  
                The blood used to make these products is collected from  
               the animal "blood donors" housed permanently or  
               semi-permanently at the blood bank.  The BOE notes that,  
               under California law, pet owners are not allowed to  
               volunteer their animals as donors to these commercial  
               blood banks.  The BOE further notes that, of the two  
               licensed animal blood banks in California, only one of  
               them operates as a nonprofit business.  Thus, it would  
               appear that this bill is designed to provide relief,  
               through a complete SUT exemption, to a single entity.  




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098   
          FN: 0003840














                                                                     SB 898


                                                                    Page  6