BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 898|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                        VETO 


          Bill No:  SB 898
          Author:   Nguyen (R), et al.
          Amended:  6/27/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE:  7-0, 4/20/16
           AYES:  Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach,  
            Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 5/27/16
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza, Nielsen

           SENATE FLOOR:  39-0, 6/2/16
           AYES:  Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,  
            Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,  
            Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning,  
            Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Stone,  
            Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           SENATE FLOOR:  39-0, 8/25/16
           AYES:  Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,  
            Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,  
            Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning,  
            Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Stone,  
            Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  70-5, 8/18/16 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Sales and use taxes:  exemption:  animal blood


          SOURCE:    Author








                                                                     SB 898  
                                                                    Page  2





          DIGEST:  This bill enacts a sales and use tax (SUT) exemption  
          for the sale of animal blood sold by a nonprofit animal blood  
          bank.


          ANALYSIS:  


          Existing law:


          1)Imposes a SUT on the sale, storage, or use of tangible  
            personal property unless exempted by state law.  


          2)Exempts human whole blood, plasma, blood products, and blood  
            derivatives, or any human body parts held in a bank for  
            medical purposes, from SUT.  


          This bill:


          1)Provides a SUT exemption for the sale of animal blood, plasma,  
            blood products, and blood derivatives, sold by nonprofit  
            animal blood banks for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment,  
            or prevention of injury or disease in animals. 


          2)Defines "nonprofit" as an organization qualified under Section  
            501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.


          3)Sunsets on January 1, 2022. 


          Background
          
          According to the California Department of Food and Agriculture,  
          only two animal blood banks in California hold licenses to  








                                                                     SB 898  
                                                                    Page  3



          produce, market, and sell animal blood and blood products.   
          These facilities provide whole blood, plasma, platelets, and  
          clotting factors to veterinary hospitals and clinics.  The blood  
          used to make these products is collected from an animal "blood  
          donor" housed permanently or semi-permanently at the blood bank.  
           California law does not allow pet owners to volunteer their  
          animals as donors to commercial blood banks.


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, SB 898  
          results in annual state and local revenue loss of approximately  
          $80,000, including $38,400 General Fund.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified10/20/16)


          ACVS Veterinary Surgeon
          American Emergency Clinic
          American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association
          American Holistic Veterinary Medical Foundation
          Animal Urgent Care
          California Veterinary Medical Association
          Center for Integrative Animal Medicine
          Eye Care for Animals
          George Runner, Board of Equalization Member
          Hemopet
          Humane Society Veterinary Medicine Association
          Holistic Veterinary Care
          Meridian Veterinary Care
          SAGE Centers for Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Care
          VCA Emergency Animal Hospital and Referral Center 


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified10/20/16)


          Animal Blood Bank








                                                                     SB 898  
                                                                    Page  4



          California State Association of Counties
          League of California Cities


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     According to the author, "SB 898  
          amends the California Revenue and Taxation code to clarify that  
          the sale and use of animal blood, blood products, and  
          derivatives by a licensed animal blood bank are not subject to  
          tax.  Since one of the two animal blood bank organizations  
          provides an integral portion of the California's animal donor  
          blood, the need to ensure the protection of this vital service  
          is necessary and appropriate.  Furthermore a similar tax  
          exemption exists in the California tax code for human blood  
          banks, a logical application of this exemption should extend  
          towards animals as well."


          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:     The League of California Cities and  
          the California State Association of Counties argue that sales  
          and use tax exemptions continue to erode the already shrinking  
          local sales tax base.  Cities and counties continue to struggle  
          financially, and sales and use tax exemptions only further  
          exacerbate the issue.  Animal Blood Bank opposes the measure's  
          limited application to nonprofits, arguing that these limits  
          preclude many smaller veterinary facilities, or any facility  
          serving cats, from the measure's benefits.


          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:


               I am returning the following seven bills without my  
               signature:

               Assembly Bill 717
               Assembly Bill 724
               Assembly Bill 1561
               Assembly Bill 2127
               Assembly Bill 2728
               Senate Bill 898
               Senate Bill 907









                                                                     SB 898  
                                                                    Page  5



               Each of these bills creates a new tax break or expands an  
               existing tax break. In total, these bills would reduce  
               revenues by about $300 million through 2017-18.

               As I said last year, tax breaks are the same as new  
               spending -- they both cost the General Fund money. As such,  
               they must be considered during budget deliberations so that  
               all spending proposals are weighed against each other at  
               the same time. This is even more important when the state's  
               budget remains precariously balanced.

               Therefore, I cannot sign these measures.


          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  70-5, 8/18/16
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,  
            Bigelow, Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos,  
            Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh,  
            Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo  
            Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove,  
            Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey,  
            Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty,  
            Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Quirk,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark  
            Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Williams, Wood,  
            Rendon
          NOES:  Gallagher, Hadley, Levine, Obernolte, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bonilla, Beth Gaines, Roger Hernández, Olsen,  
            Patterson


          Prepared by:Myriam Bouaziz / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
          10/25/16 14:29:19


                                   ****  END  ****


          











                                                                     SB 898  
                                                                    Page  6