BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |SB 909 |Hearing |4/6/16 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Beall |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |3/29/16 Amended |Fiscal: |Yes | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Grinnell | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Property tax postponement: special needs trust claimants Allows the Controller to accept applications for property tax postponement for beneficiaries of special needs trusts. Background The Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law (PTP) allows the State Controller to loan funds to pay property taxes to county tax collectors on behalf of individuals over the age of 62 or disabled persons with less than $39,000 in income per year. The Controller secures repayment by recording a lien against the claimant's property, which is satisfied when the home is sold or refinanced. As liens are repaid, revenue flows back to the Controller, who in turn uses these funds to pay property taxes for new applicants. Loans do not become due and payable if the claimant or the claimant's spouse continues to occupy the home. However, the Controller's lien is only paid off when proceeds remain after previously filed liens have been satisfied; property tax liens filed by county tax collectors have "super priority" status, and therefore must be satisfied before all others regardless of when they're filed. In 2009, the Legislature prohibited persons from filing new SB 909 (Beall) 3/29/16 Page 2 of ? claims for property tax postponement, and the Controller from accepting applications, largely due to budgetary constraints and less funds flowing back to the Controller as a result of diminishing sales prices (SBx3 8, Ducheny, 2009). However, the Legislature resuscitated the program in 2014 by removing SBx3 8's prohibition, albeit with tightened eligibility criteria, and a requirement for the Controller to transfer to the General Fund repayments received above a $20 million total (AB 2231, Gordon, 2014). The Controller states that she will begin accepting PTP applications under the reconstituted program on November 1st of this year. PTP will only loan funds to claimants to pay property taxes for their principal place of residence, and any land reasonably necessary for the dwelling to be used as a home, so long as it's owned by the claimant, the claimant and spouse, the claimant and another individual eligible for the program, or specified members of the claimant's family. Without a demonstrable ownership interest in the property, the Controller won't accept a PTP application. Additionally, the law charges the Controller with determining that the state's interest is adequately protected for every PTP loan. Current law defines ownership as: The interest of a vendee in possession under a land sale contract, provided that it's recorded, The interest of a holder of a life estate, but not remainder or reversionary interests, The interest of a joint tenant or tenant in common in the residential dwelling, The interest of a tenant in cooperative housing, or The interest of a residential dwelling in which title is held in trust, using the definition of trust used in Revenue and Taxation Code §62(d). Special needs trusts (SNTs) assist beneficiaries who are usually disabled. While SNTs resemble typical trusts in many ways, they differ in key respects. SNTs can be created by individual beneficiaries, family members, attorneys, or county public guardians or conservators to fund services for the beneficiary while maintaining Medi-Cal and Supplemental Security Income, SB 909 (Beall) 3/29/16 Page 3 of ? which can apply asset or income tests that disqualify the beneficiary. SNTs also allow trustees to manage the beneficiary's affairs, and ensure they receive adequate services. However, current law precludes the Controller from accepting PTP applications from many SNTs, as the section referenced in PTP law only accounts for ownership interests held in trusts which are either revocable, or where the transferor of assets into the trust is also its beneficiary, which isn't the case for many SNTs. Santa Clara County wants to clarify that SNT beneficiaries are eligible for PTP. Proposed Law Senate Bill 909 adds the interest of a beneficiary of a special needs trust to the list of ownership interests necessary for the Controller to accept a claim for the PTP program. State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill . According to the author: "a special needs trust is designed for beneficiaries who are disabled, either physically or mentally. Some special needs trust beneficiaries have financial difficulty in meeting their property tax obligations and meet the financial qualifications for the Property Tax Postponement Program. However, because the trust itself, rather than the individual, is considered to be the technical owner of the residence held in trust, special needs trust beneficiaries are considered ineligible for the program. Thus, under current law, some special needs trust beneficiaries who have financial difficulty meeting their tax obligations may be forced to move from their homes because they are not able to defer their tax burden. SB 909 would clarify that beneficiaries of special needs trusts who meet all other criteria for participation are eligible to apply for the property tax postponement program. This bill will allow low-income, disabled individuals to stay in their own home regardless of whether their homes are held in trust." SB 909 (Beall) 3/29/16 Page 4 of ? 2. Silent partner . Ensuring that beneficiaries of SNTs are eligible for PTP is legally difficult because no clear, comprehensive, definition currently exists. To accomplish the goal, SB 909 adds a beneficiary's interests in a SNT in which title is held in trust to the list of ownership interests which qualifies for PTP using the same code section which makes other interests in trusts eligible. The Controller states that this approach makes SNTs formed by public guardians eligible for PTP in most cases because §2111 of the Probate Code states that a transaction made by a guardian on behalf of a ward (or by a conservator on behalf of a conservatee) in accordance with an order directing the transaction has the same effect as if the ward had made the transaction while having legal capacity to do so. The Controller indicates that she will determine eligibility for PTP for SNTs not formed by public guardians and conservators on a case-by-case basis. Support and Opposition (4/1/16) Support : Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --