BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 923| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 923 Author: Hernandez (D) Amended: 5/31/16 Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 7-0, 3/30/16 AYES: Hernandez, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Roth, Wolk NO VOTE RECORDED: Nguyen, Nielsen SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 SENATE FLOOR: 29-5, 5/2/16 AYES: Allen, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, De León, Fuller, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk NOES: Anderson, Bates, Gaines, Morrell, Stone NO VOTE RECORDED: Hertzberg, Huff, Moorlach, Nguyen, Nielsen, Runner ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 8/4/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Health care coverage: cost-sharing changes SOURCE: Health Access California DIGEST: This bill prohibits a health plan contract or health insurance policy from changing any cost sharing design during the plan or policy year, except when required by state or federal law. Applies this prohibition to non-grandfathered health plan contracts and health insurance policies in the individual and small group markets and grandfathered health plan contracts and insurance policies in the individual market that SB 923 Page 2 are issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2017. Assembly Amendments clarify the bill to prohibit changes in cost sharing "design" during the plan or policy year rather than cost sharing "requirements," and define cost sharing design as the amount or proportion of cost sharing applied to a covered benefit. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to regulate health plans and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to regulate insurers, including health insurers. 2)Prohibits a health plan or health insurer, with regard to group contracts, from changing the premium rates or applicable copayments, coinsurances or deductibles for the length of the contract, except, when authorized or required in the contract, when the contract is a preliminary agreement subject to execution of a definitive agreement, or when the plan and contract-holder mutually agree in writing. (Enacted prior to the Affordable Care Act [ACA]). 3)Defines rating period for the individual market as the calendar year for which premium rates are in effect, and for the non-grandfathered small group market as the period for which premium rates established by a plan are in effect and are no less than 12 months from the date of issuance or renewal of the plan contract. (Enacted after the ACA) This bill: 1)Prohibits a health plan contract or health insurance policy from changing any cost sharing design during the plan or policy year, except when required by a state or federal law. 2)Applies 1) directly above to non-grandfathered health plan SB 923 Page 3 contracts and health insurance policies in the individual and small group markets and grandfathered health plan contracts and insurance policies in the individual market that are issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2017. 3)Defines cost sharing as any copayment, coinsurance, deductible, or any other form of cost sharing by the enrollee other than the premium or share of premium. 4)Defines cost sharing design as the amount or proportion of cost sharing applied to a covered benefit. Comments 1)Author's statement. According to the author, the ACA provides many new consumer protections to make health insurance more affordable and available. These include protections on cost-sharing, such as actuarial value requirements and placing annual limits on out-of-pocket costs. One of the many individual market reforms California enacted while implementing the ACA was a provision that prohibited plans and insurers from altering premiums during the plan year. This essential patient protection, while meaningful on its own, does not currently apply to cost sharing requirements across all markets. This bill will ensure health care consumers are actually provided what they were promised when signing up for coverage by prohibiting a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy from changing any cost sharing requirements during the plan year. Numerous consumer protections passed by California over the last several years were designed to put an end to "bait and switch" tactics previously employed by health plans and insurers. This bill continues that tradition by advancing the basic tenet that consumers should get what they pay for. 2)Health insurance and the ACA. For both small group and individual group plans or policies, California law establishes either a 12 month or calendar year rating period meaning rates have to be based on a 12 month period. Prior to the ACA, California law already prohibited in group contracts, plans and policies which allowed changing the premium rates, copayments, coinsurances or deductibles for the length of the SB 923 Page 4 contract, with certain exceptions, like the parties to the contract agree in writing. The law was passed because a health plan changed the premium rates after the open enrollment period closed. The law applies only to large group plans and policies, and grandfathered small group plans and policies. According to an article in the Los Angeles Times, in October of 2015, a major health plan settled an $8.3 million lawsuit that was brought because in 2011 the company was altering deductible requirements mid-year. As part of the settlement the plan assumed no wrong doing and argued that neither state law nor their existing contracts prohibited this practice. There were 50,000 affected consumers including one individual who received a $19,000 award because the individual had paid particularly high out-of-pocket costs. Affected consumers stated that they felt their plan was changing the rules of the game in the middle of that game. SB 923 would apply to all individual market plans and policies as well as non-grandfathered small group plans and policies. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, costs to DMHC and CDI are expected to be minor and absorbable, if any (Managed Care Fund/Insurance Fund). SUPPORT: (Verified 8/4/16) Health Access California (source) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO California Association of Health Underwriters California Labor Federation California School Employees Association California State Council of the Service Employees International Union California Optometric Association CALPIRG Consumers Union Congress of California Seniors Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of California SB 923 Page 5 National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors National Association of Social Workers-CA Chapter National Multiple Sclerosis Society - CA Action Network Retired Public Employees Association Western Center on Law and Poverty OPPOSITION: (Verified8/4/16) None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Consumers Union writes that if enacted this bill would confer on policyholders the stability that comes with knowing that the health plan consumers diligently researched, and which they determined they could afford and would cover their needs, will remain the same plan throughout the year until at least the next open enrollment period. In so doing, consumers will have the ability to make informed purchasing decisions that will remain valid throughout the plan or policy year. Health Access California writes that this is a clean-up measure and that it was always the intent that both premiums and cost sharing be stable for a year at a time. California patients deserve this basic security. The National Multiple Sclerosis Society - CA Action Network writes that individuals who enroll in a health insurance plan depend on the cost sharing information provided by the insurer to plan and budget for their annual out-of-pocket expenses for medical services and prescription drugs. Consumers are surprised and unprepared when cost sharing increases in the middle of the contract year. ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 8/4/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, SB 923 Page 6 Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NO VOTE RECORDED: Chávez, Cooley, Beth Gaines, Harper, Roger Hernández Prepared by:Teri Boughton / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111 8/5/16 14:03:21 **** END ****