BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 939| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 939 Author: Monning (D) Amended: 4/14/16 Vote: 21 SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE: 3-0, 4/12/16 AYES: McGuire, Hancock, Liu NO VOTE RECORDED: Berryhill, Nguyen SUBJECT: Continuing care contracts: cancellation: payments SOURCE: California Continuing Care Residents Association DIGEST: This bill requires that continuing care contracts that contain lump sum contract termination payments conditioned on resale of the unit must meet a series of requirements and timelines, must pay interest after a specified period of vacancy, and must meet other requirements. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Provides for the licensure and regulation of Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) by the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) to enact minimum requirements to protect the wellbeing and financial security of residents of CCRCs. (HSC 1770 et seq.) 2) Establishes the Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, which requires CDSS to license and regulate RCFEs as a separate category within the existing community care licensing structure of CDSS. (HSC 1569 et seq.) SB 939 Page 2 3) Provides for the regulation and licensure of skilled nursing facilities by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). (HSC 1250 et seq.) 4) Requires a CCRC provider to hold a certificate of authority from CDSS permitting the provider to contract for the provision of continuing care, including medical care, in which a resident over the age of 60 has paid in advance for more than one year for that care. (HSC 1771.2) 5) Provides that the components of care provided by the facility must be separately licensed as otherwise required by state law, including Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly and Skilled Nursing care. (HSC 1771.5) 6) Requires a CCRC to pay refunds owed to a resident within 14 calendar days after a resident makes possession of the living unit available to the provider or 90 calendar days after death or receipt of notice of termination, whichever is later. (HSC 1788.4 (a)) 7) Prohibits characterizing as a refund, a lump sum payment following termination of a continuing care contract that is conditioned upon resale of the unit, and requires the payment to be made within 90 days following resale of the unit. (HSC 1788.4 (e)) This bill: 1) Requires that a continuing care contract that includes a promise to repay all or a portion of an entrance fee that is conditioned upon re-occupancy or resale of the unit previously occupied by the resident shall not be considered a refundable contract, provided that this conditional promise of repayment is not referred to by the applicant or provider as a "refund." 2) Requires that, in addition to existing contract requirements, a continuing care contract shall contain certain defined disclosures including, but not limited to, provisions describing changes in monthly fees, the policy or terms for refunds or repayments, and a statement regarding SB 939 Page 3 the average and longest amount of time that it has taken to resell a unit within the last five calendar years. 3) Requires that the full lump-sum owed, including any interest accrued, shall be paid to the resident within 14 calendar days after resale of the unit. 4) Requires that the resident is entitled to the repayment of a specified portion of the full lump-sum owed if the unit remains vacant 120 days after the resident's termination of the contract, as specified. 5) Requires that, when a continuing care contract is terminated by the death of a resident, at least 10 percent of the full lump-sum owed shall be paid to the resident's estate within 120 days after the death of the resident. 6) Requires that, when a continuing care contract is terminated for reasons other than death of a resident, at least 20 percent of the full lump-sum owed shall be paid to the resident within 120 days after the resident's termination of the contract. 7) Requires any payments that are not paid to the resident within the 180-day period shall accrue simple interest, at a rate of 4 percent. 8) Requires any payments that are not paid to the resident within the 240-day period shall accrue simple interest, at a rate of 6 percent. 9) Requires that any amount owed that is not paid to the resident a year after the 240-day period shall accrue compounded interested annually, at a rate of 6 percent. 10)Exempts projects in development prior to January 1, 2017, from certain provisions of the bill, as specified. 11)Prohibits the provider from making any charges to the resident or the resident's estate for purposes of maintenance or housekeeping of the vacated unit, as specified. SB 939 Page 4 12)Makes other technical clean up changes. Background According to the author, there have been documented cases where Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) residents, and/or their heirs, have experienced significant delays in receiving their lump-sum payments from entrance fees that are conditioned upon resale of their CCRC unit. The author states that this popular contract model conditions repayment -- which is typically 70 to 90 percent of the resident's entrance fee -- upon resale of the unit only works when the unit is resold quickly. According to the author, if the CCRC provider has a disincentive to resell in a timely manner or the unit is unable to sell, then the resident or their estate is forced to wait with no definitive timeline for when repayment must be made. The author additionally states that these conditional refunds can create an incentive for CCRC providers to fill empty units prior to filling units that have repayment requirements. In some cases, a unit might go unsold until a neighboring unit is unoccupied because the provider wants to make renovations. The problem of delayed repayment can prevent an elder resident from moving or tie up an estate. Ironically, one reason why this contract model is popular is it provides the resident assurance that this lump-sum payment will be available to them should something happen or they pass away, the author states. In addition, some contract provisions allow the provider to continue to charge a monthly maintenance fee that is deducted from the resident's entrance fee months after the CCRC is vacated. Continuing Care Retirement Communities CCRCs offer people 60 years old and up a long-term continuing care option that pairs their current health and resources with an individualized contract that provides community life and a range of levels-of-care. Typically this is offered in a campus-like community setting, and usually for a resident's lifetime, and always for at least one year. Most CCRCs require substantial entrance fees, along with monthly fees. Entrance fees can range from $50,000 to more than $2 million. SB 939 Page 5 A CCRC is defined in statute (HSC 1771) as a facility where services promised in a "continuing care contract" are provided. A continuing care contract includes a continuing care promise made, in exchange for an entrance fee, the payment of periodic charges, or both. A continuing care contract may consist of one agreement for continuous care, or a series of agreements describing care, conditions for that care, and payment of it, if and when it becomes necessary. Continuing care contracts vary. Each potential consumer has different health and long-term care risks and needs, financial risks and needs, and other factors that require contract flexibility, and each CCRC offers differing provisions on costs, payment methods, services provided, and other elements. Continuing care contracts typically require an individual to pay an entrance fee and monthly fees. Entrance fees can vary significantly from one community to the next, and monthly fees vary depending on the level of services included in the contract and other factors associated with location, exclusivity, business plan variations, and more. Continuing care contracts may be refundable or non-refundable. Refundable contracts refund a portion of the entrance fees, sometimes on a scale that decreases over time. These types of contracts require a CCRC to maintain a reserve for refunds (in addition to other reserves required for the operation of a CCRC), and generally, this is not the contract type which SB 939 is focused upon. Many CCRC providers choose instead to offer a repayment of a designated portion of the entrance fee - a "lump-sum payment" - that is conditioned upon resale of the unit. A reserve is not required in this case, as it is assumed that the resale of the unit will result in the new resident's entrance fee covering the cost of repaying a portion of the former resident's entrance fee. In California, there are currently no requirements that resale and/or repayment of entrance fees take place within a certain period of time. Related/Prior Legislation AB 2661 (Burke, 2016) allows for CCRC contracts that condition lump-sum payments based upon resale of "any" unit - as opposed to the unit previously occupied by the resident - to not be SB 939 Page 6 considered a "refundable contract," making the refund reserve requirements inapplicable in such circumstances. This bill is scheduled to be heard in Assembly Human Services Committee April 26, 2016. SB 475 (Monning, 2015) was substantially similar to this bill and would have required prospective and future CCRC contracts which condition lump sum contract termination payments on resale of the unit to meet a series of requirements and timelines, to pay interest after a specified period of vacancy, and to meet other requirements. SB 475 was vetoed by the Governor. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified 4/14/16) California Continuing Care Residents Associations (source) AARP California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform California Commission on Aging Consumer Federation of California National Association of Social Workers Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman 266 individuals OPPOSITION: (Verified 4/14/16) Erickson Living ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The California Continuing Care Residents Association (CALCRA), which is the bill's source, states that residents and families have been left waiting years to receive payments from CCRCs across the state. CALCRA also states that SB 939 would provide a much-needed incentive for CCRC providers to repay entrance fees within a reasonable amount of time and SB 939 Page 7 ensures that CCRCs make a good faith effort to meet the terms of the contract and re-sell vacant units. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:Erickson Living opposes the bill unless it is amended to give CCRCs greater flexibility in providing seniors a retirement housing that better suits their needs and ensures timely repayment of a portion of the entrance fee to estates. The mechanics of SB 939 require that repayments to estates take precedence over ensuring the financial stability of more than 100 communities and tens-of-thousands of senior living in California CCRCs. Erickson believes this requirement has more to potential harm Prepared by: Taryn Smith / HUMAN S. / (916) 651-1524 4/15/16 14:10:39 **** END ****