BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES Senator Mike McGuire, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: SB 947 Hearing Date: March 29, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Pan | |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------| |Version: |February 3, 2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |No | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|Taryn Smith | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Public assistance: personal interviews SUMMARY This bill authorizes county human services agencies to conduct a personal interview of CalWORKs applicants telephonically or through electronic means. The bill requires a personal interview to be conducted if requested by an applicant or recipient. It deletes the requirement that the county department verify an applicant is incapable of acting on his or her own behalf. ABSTRACT Existing law: 1) Establishes the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, which permits states to implement the program under a state plan. (42 USC § 601 et seq.) 2) Establishes in state law the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program to provide cash assistance and other social services for low-income families through the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Under CalWORKs, each county provides assistance through a combination of state, county and federal TANF funds. (WIC 10530) SB 947 (Pan) PageB of? 3) Prohibits an applicant from being granted public assistance under CalWORKs until he or she is personally interviewed by the county human services agency or state hospital staff. (WIC 11052.5) 4) Requires the personal interview to be conducted promptly following the application for CalWORKs assistance. If an applicant is incapable of acting in his or her own behalf, the county department shall verify this fact by personal contact with the applicant before aid is authorized. (WIC 11052.5) 5) Establishes under federal law the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) within the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) to promote the general welfare and to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the nation's population by raising the levels of nutrition among low-income households. It establishes SNAP eligibility requirements, including income that is at or below 130 percent of the federal poverty level and is determined to be a substantial limiting factor in permitting a recipient to obtain a more nutritious diet. (7 CFR 271.1; 7 CFR 273.9) 6) Establishes in California statute the CalFresh program to administer the provision of federal SNAP benefits to families and individuals meeting specified criteria. (WIC 18900 et seq.) This bill: 1) Names this bill the County Option of Efficient Interviewing of CalWORKs Applicants Act of 2016. 2) Deletes the requirement that applicants for some social services, including child welfare, adult protective and in home support services, shall not be granted those services until he or she is first personally interviewed by the county human services agency or state staff for patients in state hospitals. SB 947 (Pan) PageC of? 3) Permits that, in lieu of an in-person personal interview, county human services agencies, or state staff or patients in state hospitals, may elect to conduct an interview of CalWORKs applicants telephonically or through other electronic means. 4) Deletes the requirement that, if an applicant is incapable of acting in his or her own behalf, the county department shall verify this fact by personal contact with the applicant before aid is authorized. 5) Requires a personal interview to be conducted if requested by an applicant. FISCAL IMPACT This bill has not been analyzed by a fiscal committee. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION According to the author, the counties that have set up the infrastructure to do telephone interviews for CalFresh applicants should have the option to do the same for CalWORKs applicants if it would achieve administrative efficiency. The author also states the cost of transportation can be very burdensome, especially for families living in rural California. As noted by one of the bill's sponsors, the Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organization, current law was "enacted before the advent of modern tools that allow for interviews to be completed and, recorded and stored electronically in the case file. Today, these interviews can be completed telephonically, by video or electronically in ways that are more efficient without compromising the integrity of the program." According to CDSS, if SB 947 were signed into law, CalWORKs applicants will still be required to sign their application forms and submit fingerprints and photographs to the county human services agencies. SB 947 (Pan) PageD of? SB 947 (Pan) PageE of? CalWORKs According to California Public Policy Institute, 21% of Californians were living in poverty and 23.9% of California's children were living in poverty in 2013. During and after the Great Recession, California saw growing rates of childhood deep poverty - those living below 50 percent of the federal poverty line. One of California's most essential anti-poverty strategies is the CalWORKs program, which provides cash assistance to approximately 540,000 families - including more than 1 million children, according to 2014 federal data. CalWORKs implements the federal TANF program in California. In addition to temporary cash assistance to meet basic family needs, CalWORKs provides education, employment and training programs. CDSS is the designated state agency responsibility for program supervision at the state level. The counties are responsible for administering the caseloads at the local level. The CalWORKs program is funded with a mix of federal, state, and county funds. State law provides for a cumulative 48-month lifetime limit on cash aid for adults. During those 48 months, adults may receive a total of 24 months of Welfare-to-Work (WTW) services and activities. WTW activities include subsidized and unsubsidized employment, community service, adult basic education, job skills, training, mental health counseling, substance abuse treatment and other activities necessary to assist recipients in obtaining employment. Once the 24 months of WTW activities have been exhausted, adults must meet the stricter federal work participation requirements (20, 30, or 35 hours weekly, depending on family composition) unless they are exempt or receive an extension. Children of adults who exhaust the 48-month lifetime limit may continue to receive cash aid, if otherwise eligible, up to age 18. Use of telephone Interviews for CalFresh SB 947 (Pan) PageF of? Under a federal USDA waiver,<1> and under current regulatory requirements,<2> California's county human services agencies have the option to allow CalFresh applicants to satisfy the interview requirement over the telephone rather than mandating a face-to-face interview. In 2009, CDSS informed county welfare departments that they had the option of waiving the face-to-face interview for CalFresh applicants and recipients at initial application, recertification, or both.<3> In 2012, CDSS issued an All County Letter stating, "As an element of program simplification and as part of CDSS commitment to improving access, offering the option of a telephone interview in lieu of a face-to-face interview will now be required at intake and recertification." The same ACL reported that waiving the requirement for a face-to-face interview "has not negatively affected payment error rates, is beneficial for CalFresh applicants and recipients, and provides administrative relief for county staff.<4> According to data from USDA, overpayments to Cal Fresh recipients in California have not shown significant increase since telephone interviews were initiated in 2009: --------------------------------- | Year | CalFresh Overpayment | | | Rate | |----------+----------------------| | 2009 | 3.07 % | |----------+----------------------| | 2010 | 3.56% | |----------+----------------------| | 2011 | 2.65 % | |----------+----------------------| | 2012 | 3.06% | |----------+----------------------| | 2013 | 2.82% | |----------+----------------------| --------------------------- <1> USDA Food and Nutrition Services Waiver #2130007, implemented August 1, 2013. <2> US 7 CFR 273.2(e)(3) and California Manual of Policies and Procedures Section 63-300.46 <3> CDSS All County Letter #09-62, October 23, 2009 <4> CDSS All County Letter #12-26, May 31, 2012 SB 947 (Pan) PageG of? | 2014 |4.14% | --------------------------------- Online Application for Medi-Cal California's version of the federal Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, services low-income individuals, including but not limited to: families, seniors, persons with disabilities, children in foster care, pregnant women, and childless adults with incomes below 138% of federal poverty level. Applications for Medi-Cal benefits may be filed online, in person or by mail. All applicants are required to submit some signed documents, so there is still paperwork component of the Medi-Cal application process. Related legislation: Senate Bill 297 (McGuire, 2015) had provisions that would have facilitated electronic verification of eligibility for certain means-tested public benefits programs; clarified when an eligibility worker should conduct a telephone interview; required the CDSS to issue guidance for recording and storing electronic and telephonic signatures; and required CDSS to coordinate with county human services agencies to make available standard technological solutions with the capacity to store telephonic and electronic signatures. The bill was held in Senate Appropriations Committee. Senate Bill 312 (Pan, 2014) would have authorized the county human services agency or state hospital staff to conduct a personal interview of CalWORKs applicants telephonically or through electronic means. The bill would have required a face-to-face interview to be conducted if requested by an applicant or recipient. This bill was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee. Assembly Bill 1970 (Skinner, 2012) sought to modernize and streamline the administration of, and remove barriers to participation in, social services programs, including removing the face-to-face interview requirement for CalWORKs and CalFresh as a condition of receipt of aid. AB 1970 was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee. SB 947 (Pan) PageH of? AB 6 (Fuentes, Chapter 501, Statutes of 2011) removed the CalFresh fingerprinting requirement, modified reporting requirements from quarterly to semi-annually, and made other changes. AB 231 (Steinberg, Chapter 743, Statutes of 2003) permitted counties to exempt a household from complying with the face-to-face interview required by a CalFresh applicant, in addition to other policy changes. COMMENTS There is precedence for allowing telephone interviews in lieu of face-to-face interviews to determine eligibility for other social services. Expanding the option for CalWORKs applicants to be interviewed over the phone would take advantage of modern communication systems. It would also be consistent with other efforts to modernize statewide services, such as telephone interviews for CalFresh and online applications for Medi-Cal services. For reasons listed below, the committee recommends the following amendments to the bill. Amendment #1 The bill proposes to delete reference to "Chapter 5 (commencing with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 13000)," which would remove the requirement for county human services agencies to interview applicants for some social services, including child welfare, adult protective and in home support services. The author states that he never intended to delete that requirement. It appears deleting reference to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 13000) was a drafting error. The committee recommends the following amendment to WIC Section 11052.5 (a): An applicant shall not be granted public assistance under Chapters 2 (commencing with Section 11200) and 5.1 (commencing with Section 13000) until he or she is first personally interviewed by the office of the county human services agency or state staff for patients in state hospitals. Amendment #2 Current law, WIC Section 11052.5(b) requires an interview to be SB 947 (Pan) PageI of? conducted "promptly" following the application for assistance. Similarly, Section 11052.5(c) states that the interview "shall occur within seven days" after the application is received. For purposes of clarity, it may be beneficial to delete the language in section (b), as shown below. Additionally, as currently drafted, SB 947 deletes the requirement that if an applicant is incapable of acting in her or her own behalf, the county human services agency must verify this fact by personal contact with the applicant before aid is authorized. Conducting the verification by personal contact may not be necessary, but it could be performed via telephone or other electronic means. The committee recommends the following amendment to WIC 11052.5(b): In lieu of an in-person personal interview as required under subdivision (a), the county may elect to conduct the interview required by this section telephonically or through other electronic means.The interview shall be conducted promptly following the application for assistance.If an applicant is incapable of acting in his or her own behalf, the county department shall verify this fact with the applicant before aid is authorized . As used in this section, the term public assistance does not include health care as provided by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000). Amendment #3 WIC Section 11052.5(d) requires a personal interview to be conducted, if requested by an applicant. The committee recommends clarifying that an "in-person" interview may be requested by an applicant. The committee recommends the following amendment to WIC 11052.5(d): (d) A n in-person personal interview shall be conducted if requested by an applicant. POSITIONS Support: Coalition of California Welfare Rights Organizations (Sponsor) County Welfare Directors Association of California (Co-sponsor) SB 947 (Pan) PageJ of? California Association of Food Banks California Food Policy Advocates Children's defense Fund - California Courage Campaign National Association of Social Workers Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors St Anthony's Foundation Oppose: None received. -- END --