BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 1000 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 10, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair SB 1000 (Leyva) - As Amended August 1, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Local Government |Vote:|6 - 3 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires cities and counties to address environmental justice in their general plans. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires a city or county to include in the general plan an environmental justice (EJ) element, or related goals, policies, and objectives integrated in other elements, that identifies disadvantaged communities within the area covered by the general plan of that city or county, if the city or county has a disadvantaged community. 2)Requires the EJ element, or related EJ goals, policies, and SB 1000 Page 2 objectives integrated in other elements, to do all of the following: a) Identify objectives and policies to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities by means that include, but are not limited to, the reduction of pollution exposure, including the improvement of air quality, and the promotion of public facilities, food access, safe and sanitary homes, and physical activity; b) Identify objectives and policies to promote civil engagement in the public decisionmaking process; and, c) Identify objectives and policies that prioritize improvements and programs that address the needs of disadvantaged communities. 3)Requires a city or county to adopt or review the EJ element, or the EJ goals, policies, and objectives in other elements, upon the adoption or next revision of two or more elements on or after January 1, 2018. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)One-time costs of up to $60,000 to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to produce written guidance related to the mandatory environmental justice element to supplement the adopted General Plan Guidelines. (GF). Since OPR is expected to release a comprehensive update to its General Plan Guidelines this year, SB 1000 is likely to require OPR to provide supplemental guidance to local agencies to account for new environmental justice mandatory planning requirements. SB 1000 Page 3 2)Unknown, significant local costs to develop and adopt a new environmental justice general plan element, or related goals, policies, and objectives that are integrated into other elements, and revise other elements to ensure consistency. These local costs are not state-reimbursable because local agencies have the authority to impose fees to cover their costs. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, "SB 1000 would ensure that communities in California take into account the environmental and pollution impacts on local residents living in areas that may be disproportionately exposed to toxins or other contaminants that can hurt them or their families. Residents in poorer communities oftentimes suffer from higher rates of asthma, cancer, and birth defects, so we must do all we can to eliminate environmental factors that may be contributing to those serious health problems." 2)Background. Existing law requires cities and counties to adopt a general plan with seven mandatory elements: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety. Although state law specifies the minimum requirements of a plan, local officials may adopt optional elements that address additional topics based on regional necessity. Once adopted, those optional elements have the same legal force as the mandatory elements. The general plan must be "internally consistent," which means the various elements cannot have conflicting information or assumptions. With the exception of SB 1000 Page 4 the housing element, which must be updated every five to eight years, cities and counties are not required to regularly update the general plan. Existing law requires OPR to periodically revise guidelines for the preparation and content of local general plans. AB 1553 (Keeley), Chapter 762, Statutes of 2001, specifically required OPR to adopt recommendations in its guidelines by 2003 that local governments can use to address environmental justice issues in their general plans. OPR is currently in the final stages of the first comprehensive update to the General Plan Guidelines since 2003. The proposed guidelines include stand-alone chapters on environmental justice and community engagement, and also include provisions providing guidance on social equity. According to OPR's most recent Annual Planning Survey from 2014, 101 cities and counties reported that their general plans provide consideration for equity issues, and two cities have adopted optional general plan elements specifically addressing environmental justice. 3)Arguments in Support. Supporters, primarily environmental protection and health related organizations, note that this bill would help cities and counties address issues, such as pollution exposure, while promoting better food access, physical activity, improved air quality and healthier communities. 4)Arguments in Opposition. Opponents, primarily cities, builders, and business and commercial property owners, note that "all new development must be consistent with the general plan. Yet the federal and state constitutions prohibit requiring new projects to pay for deficiencies that pre-date the proposed new project in the community. New projects SB 1000 Page 5 cannot comply with both the proposed new general plan element and the federal and state constitutions, though that is what the bill will require." Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081