BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 970| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 970 Author: Leyva (D) Amended: 5/10/16 Vote: 21 SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/20/16 AYES: Wieckowski, Gaines, Bates, Hill, Jackson, Leno, Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: grant program: recyclable materials SOURCE: Inland Empire Utilities Agency DIGEST: This bill requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), in awarding a grant for organics composting or anaerobic digestion via the Organics Grant Program (OGP), to consider specified factors, such as the amount of greenhouse gas emissions reductions that may result from the project. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Enacts the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Public Resources Code (PRC) §40000 et seq.) which: a) Establishes a statewide diversion goal of 75% by 2020. b) Requires local agencies to divert, through source reduction, recycling, and composting, 50% of solid waste disposed by their jurisdictions. SB 970 Page 2 c) Requires a commercial waste generator, including multi-family dwellings, to arrange for recycling services and requires local governments to implement commercial solid waste recycling programs designed to divert solid waste from businesses. d) Requires generators of specified amounts of organic waste to arrange for recycling services for that material. 2)Establishes the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) in the State Treasury, requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected pursuant to a market-based mechanism be deposited in the fund and requires the Department of Finance, in consultation with ARB and any other relevant state agency, to develop, as specified, a three-year investment plan for the moneys deposited in the GGRF. (Government Code §16428.8). 3)Prohibits the state from approving allocations for a measure or program using GGRF moneys except after determining that the use of those moneys furthers the regulatory purposes of AB 32, and requires moneys from the GGRF be used to facilitate the achievement of reductions of GHG emissions in California. (Health and Safety Code §39712). 4)Requires the CalRecycle to administer a grant program to provide financial assistance to reduce GHG emissions by promoting in-state development and infrastructure to process organics and other recyclable materials into new value-added products, using funding from GGRF. Specifies that the funding may be used for projects including organics composting, anaerobic digestion, or recyclable material manufacturing infrastructure projects or other related activities that reduce GHG emissions. (PRC §42999). This bill requires CalRecycle, in awarding a grant for organics composting or anaerobic digestion via the Organics Grant Program (OGP), to consider the following: 1)The amount of GHG emissions reductions that may result; SB 970 Page 3 2)The amount of organic material that may be diverted from landfills; 3)If, and how, the project may benefit disadvantaged communities; 4)Project readiness and permitting required; and, 5)Air and water quality benefits. Background 1)Statewide waste diversion goals. CalRecycle is tasked with diverting at least 75% of solid waste statewide by 2020. Currently, an estimated 31 million tons of waste are disposed of in California's landfills annually, of which 37% is compostable organic materials, 20% is inert and other construction and demolition debris, and 17% is paper and paperboard, 10% plastics, 3% metal, with the remaining 12% consisting of various materials such as glass and other waste. In addition, CalRecycle is charged with implementing Strategic Directive 6.1, which calls for reducing organic waste disposal by 50% by 2020. According to CalRecycle, significant gains in organic waste diversion (through recycling technologies or organic waste, including composting and anaerobic digestion) are necessary to meet the 75% goal and to implement Strategic Directive 6.1. 2)Recycling organic waste. For purposes of recycling, "organic waste" is defined as food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food-soiled paper waste that is mixed in with food waste. Organic material represents over one-third of the solid waste sent to landfills even though a large percentage can be recycled or composted - Approximately 6 million tons of food scraps are thrown away each year. Recycling technologies for organic waste include anaerobic SB 970 Page 4 digestion, composting, and other types of processing that generate renewable fuels, energy, soil amendments, and mulch. Anaerobic digestion, which produces biogas that can be processed into biomethane fuel, is particularly suited to handle food waste. 3)Waste reduction and GHGs. According to the California Air Resources Board (ARB), a total reduction of 80 million metric tons (MMT), or 16% compared to business as usual, is necessary to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. ARB intends to achieve approximately 78% of the reductions through direct regulations. ARB proposes to achieve the balance of reductions necessary to meet the 2020 limit (approximately 18 MMT) through its cap-and-trade program. Landfill gas is generated by the anaerobic decomposition of organic materials such as food, paper, wood, and green material. 50% of landfill gas is methane, a GHG with a much shorter life (also known as a short-lived climate pollutant), but much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (methane is approximately 25 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon dioxide over a 100-year time span). Depending on the types of solid waste, the chemical makeup of landfill biogas can vary greatly from the biogas produced from dairy farms, municipal solid waste, and wastewater treatment facilities. While most modern landfills have systems in place to capture methane, significant amounts continue to escape into the atmosphere. According to ARB's GHG inventory, approximately 7 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent are released annually by landfills. That number is expected to increase to 8.5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2020. Composting and other organics processing technologies, including anaerobic digestion, reduce GHGs by avoiding the emissions that would be generated by the material's decomposition in a landfill. For example, in the case of anaerobic digestion, the process produces methane from the organic waste in a controlled environment for use as a renewable fuel, and results in climate benefits by both reducing GHGs from SB 970 Page 5 landfills, and displacing fossil fuels. Recycling organic waste provides significant GHG reductions over landfilling. 4)Organics Grant Program (OGP). OGP includes a competitive grant program created for the purpose of lowering overall GHG emissions by expanding existing capacity or establishing new facilities in the state to reduce the amount of California-generated green materials, food materials, or alternative daily cover being sent to landfills. Eligible projects include construction, renovation or expansion of facilities in California that compost, anaerobically digest, or use other related digestion or fermentation processes to turn green or food materials into value-added projects. The projects must result in permanent, annual, and measurable: i) reductions in GHG emissions from the handling and landfilling of California-generated green and food materials; and, ii) increases in quantity (tons) of California-generated green materials, food materials, or alternative daily cover diverted from landfills and composted, digested or diverted to other fermentation processes. 5)Cap-and-trade auction revenue. Since November 2012, ARB has conducted 14 cap-and-trade auctions, generating over $4 billion in proceeds to the state. State law specifies that the auction revenues must be used to facilitate the achievement of GHG emissions reductions and outlines various categories of allowable expenditures. Statute further requires the Department of Finance, in consultation with ARB and any other relevant state agency, to develop a three-year investment plan for the auction proceeds, which are deposited in the GGRF. Disadvantaged communities. SB 535 (de León, Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012) requires the Department of Finance, in the investment plan, to allocate at least 25% of available moneys in the GGRF to projects that provide benefits to disadvantaged communities, and at least SB 970 Page 6 10% to projects located within disadvantaged communities. To meet the SB 535 mandate, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, under CalEPA's guidance, developed a tool (termed CalEnviroScreen) to assess and rank census tracts across the state that are disproportionately affected by multiple types of pollution and areas with vulnerable populations. CalEPA has designated 25% of census tracts in California as disadvantaged communities for the purpose of investing cap-and-trade proceeds. Additionally, SB 862 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 36, Statutes of 2014) requires ARB to develop guidelines on maximizing benefits for disadvantaged communities by agencies administering GGRF funds. Legal consideration of cap-and-trade auction revenues. The 2012-13 Budget analysis of cap-and-trade auction revenue by the Legislative Analyst's Office noted that, based on an opinion from the Office of Legislative Counsel, the auction revenues should be considered mitigation fee revenues, and their use requires that a clear nexus exist between an activity for which a mitigation fee is used and the adverse effects related to the activity on which that fee is levied. Therefore, in order for their use to be valid as mitigation fees, revenues from the cap-and-trade auction must be used to mitigate GHG emissions or the harms caused by GHG emissions. In 2012, the California Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the ARB claiming that cap-and-trade auction revenues constitute illegal tax revenue. In November 2013, the superior court ruling declined to hold the auction a tax, concluding that it is more akin to a regulatory fee. In February of 2014, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento. That case is currently pending. Comments Purpose of Bill. SB 970 Page 7 According to the author, "California must achieve deep reductions in short-lived climate pollutants by 2030 in order to meet future greenhouse gas emission targets and air quality goals. Short lived climate pollutants (SLCP), also known as "Super Pollutants," have a much greater warming effect than CO2. This means that reducing SLCPs such as methane will have a significant impact on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. Cutting methane emissions from solid waste disposal is a key state strategy to slow global warming and reduce the impacts of climate change." FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified5/18/16) Inland Empire Utilities Agency (source) OPPOSITION: (Verified5/18/16) None received Prepared by:Joanne Roy / E.Q. / (916) 651-4108 5/18/16 16:27:51 **** END **** SB 970 Page 8