BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 970| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 970 Author: Leyva (D) Amended: 6/29/16 Vote: 21 SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/20/16 AYES: Wieckowski, Gaines, Bates, Hill, Jackson, Leno, Pavley SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 SENATE FLOOR: 27-4, 5/31/16 AYES: Allen, Beall, Block, De León, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Wieckowski, Wolk NOES: Anderson, Moorlach, Morrell, Vidak NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates, Berryhill, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Nguyen, Nielsen, Runner, Stone ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 8/23/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: grant program: recyclable materials SOURCE: Inland Empire Utilities Agency DIGEST: This bill requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), in awarding a grant for organics composting or anaerobic digestion projects funded with AB 32 cap-and-trade revenues (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) and authorizes CalRecycle to provide larger grant awards for large-scale regional projects. SB 970 Page 2 Assembly Amendments add a provision authorizing CalRecycle to provide bigger grant awards for large-scale regional integrated projects that provide cost-effective organic waste diversion and maximize environmental benefits. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Enacts, pursuant to the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Public Resources Code (PRC) §40000 et seq.), which: a) Establishes a statewide diversion goal of 75% by 2020. b) Requires local agencies to divert, through source reduction, recycling, and composting, 50% of solid waste disposed by their jurisdictions. c) Requires a commercial waste generator, including multi-family dwellings, to arrange for recycling services and requires local governments to implement commercial solid waste recycling programs designed to divert solid waste from businesses. d) Requires generators of specified amounts of organic waste to arrange for recycling services for that material. 2) Establishes the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) in the State Treasury, requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected pursuant to a market-based mechanism be deposited in the fund and requires the Department of Finance, in consultation with ARB and any other relevant state agency, to develop, as specified, a three-year investment plan for the moneys deposited in the GGRF. (Government Code §16428.8). SB 970 Page 3 3) Prohibits the state from approving allocations for a measure or program using GGRF moneys except after determining that the use of those moneys furthers the regulatory purposes of AB 32, and requires moneys from the GGRF be used to facilitate the achievement of reductions of GHG emissions in California. (Health and Safety Code §39712). 4) Requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer a grant program to provide financial assistance to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by promoting in-state development and infrastructure to process organics and other recyclable materials into new value-added products, using funding from GGRF. Specifies that the funding may be used for projects including organics composting, anaerobic digestion, or recyclable material manufacturing infrastructure projects or other related activities that reduce GHG emissions. (PRC §42999). This bill: 1)Requires CalRecycle, in awarding a grant for organics composting or anaerobic digestion to reduce GHG emissions using GGRF funding, to consider the following: a) The amount of GHG emissions reductions that may result from the project; b) The amount of organic material that may be diverted from landfills as a result of the project; c) If, and how, the project may benefit disadvantaged communities; d) For anaerobic digestion projects, if, and how, the project maximizes resource recovery, including the production of clean energy or low-carbon or carbon negative transportation fuels; SB 970 Page 4 e) Project readiness and permitting that the project may require; and, f) Air and water quality benefits that the project may provide. 1)To the extent funds are available, authorizes CalRecycle to provide larger grant awards for large-scale regional integrated projects that provide cost-effective organic waste diversion and maximize environmental benefits. Background 1)Recycling organic waste. For purposes of recycling, "organic waste" is defined as food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food-soiled paper waste that is mixed in with food waste. Organic material represents over one-third of the solid waste sent to landfills even though a large percentage can be recycled or composted - approximately 6 million tons of food scraps are thrown away each year. Recycling technologies for organic waste include anaerobic digestion, composting, and other types of processing that generate renewable fuels, energy, soil amendments, and mulch. Anaerobic digestion, which produces biogas that can be processed into biomethane fuel, is particularly suited to handle food waste. 2)Waste reduction and GHGs. According to the California Air Resources Board (ARB), a total reduction of 80 million metric tons (MMT), or 16% compared to business as usual, is necessary to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. ARB intends to achieve approximately 78% of the reductions through direct regulations. ARB proposes to achieve the balance of reductions necessary to meet the 2020 limit (approximately 18 SB 970 Page 5 MMT) through its cap-and-trade program. Landfill gas is generated by the anaerobic decomposition of organic materials such as food, paper, wood, and green material. 50% of landfill gas is methane, a GHG with a much shorter life (also known as a short-lived climate pollutant), but much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (methane is approximately 25 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon dioxide over a 100-year time span). Depending on the types of solid waste, the chemical makeup of landfill biogas can vary greatly from the biogas produced from dairy farms, municipal solid waste, and wastewater treatment facilities. While most modern landfills have systems in place to capture methane, significant amounts continue to escape into the atmosphere. According to ARB's GHG inventory, approximately 7 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent are released annually by landfills. That number is expected to increase to 8.5 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2020. Composting and other organics processing technologies, including anaerobic digestion, reduce GHGs by avoiding the emissions that would be generated by the material's decomposition in a landfill. For example, in the case of anaerobic digestion, the process produces methane from the organic waste in a controlled environment for use as a renewable fuel, and results in climate benefits by both reducing GHGs from landfills, and displacing fossil fuels. Recycling organic waste provides significant GHG reductions over landfilling. 3)Organics Grant Program (OGP). OGP includes a competitive grant program created for the purpose of lowering overall GHG emissions by expanding existing capacity or establishing new facilities in the state to reduce the amount of California-generated green materials, food materials, or alternative daily cover being sent to landfills. Eligible projects include construction, renovation or expansion of facilities in California that compost, anaerobically digest, or use other related digestion or fermentation processes to turn green or food materials into value-added projects. The projects must result in permanent, annual, and measurable: i) reductions in GHG emissions from the handling and landfilling SB 970 Page 6 of California-generated green and food materials; and, ii) increases in quantity (tons) of California-generated green materials, food materials, or alternative daily cover diverted from landfills and composted, digested or diverted to other fermentation processes. 4)Cap-and-trade auction revenue. Since November 2012, ARB has conducted 14 cap-and-trade auctions, generating over $4 billion in proceeds to the state. State law specifies that the auction revenues must be used to facilitate the achievement of GHG emissions reductions and outlines various categories of allowable expenditures. Statute further requires the Department of Finance, in consultation with ARB and any other relevant state agency, to develop a three-year investment plan for the auction proceeds, which are deposited in the GGRF. Legal consideration of cap-and-trade auction revenues. The 2012-13 Budget analysis of cap-and-trade auction revenue by the Legislative Analyst's Office noted that, based on an opinion from the Office of Legislative Counsel, the auction revenues should be considered mitigation fee revenues, and their use requires that a clear nexus exist between an activity for which a mitigation fee is used and the adverse effects related to the activity on which that fee is levied. Therefore, in order for their use to be valid as mitigation fees, revenues from the cap-and-trade auction must be used to mitigate GHG emissions or the harms caused by GHG emissions. In 2012, the California Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the ARB claiming that cap-and-trade auction revenues constitute illegal tax revenue. In November 2013, the superior court ruling declined to hold the auction a tax, concluding that it is more akin to a regulatory fee. In February of 2014, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento. That case is currently pending. Comments SB 970 Page 7 Purpose of Bill. According to the author, "California must achieve deep reductions in short-lived climate pollutants by 2030 in order to meet future greenhouse gas emission targets and air quality goals. Short lived climate pollutants (SLCP), also known as "Super Pollutants," have a much greater warming effect than CO2. This means that reducing SLCPs such as methane will have a significant impact on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. Cutting methane emissions from solid waste disposal is a key state strategy to slow global warming and reduce the impacts of climate change." FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, "No additional state costs. According to CalRecycle, this bill codifies criteria that are already part of grant award consideration for anaerobic digestion and composting projects. Further, CalRecycle contends they have the ability to award larger grants for large-scale projects under current law." SUPPORT: (Verified8/15/16) California Association of Sanitation Agencies Carbon Cycle Institute County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Inland Empire Utilities Agency Sonoma County Water Agency Southern California Gas Company OPPOSITION: (Verified8/15/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 8/23/16 SB 970 Page 8 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NO VOTE RECORDED: Burke, Cooper, Gonzalez Prepared by: Joanne Roy / E.Q. / (916) 651-4108 8/29/16 10:34:45 **** END ****