Amended in Assembly August 18, 2016

Amended in Assembly August 1, 2016

Amended in Assembly June 29, 2016

Amended in Senate May 31, 2016

Amended in Senate April 21, 2016

Amended in Senate March 28, 2016

Senate Bill No. 1004

Introduced by Senator Hill

February 10, 2016

An act to add and repeal Chapter 2.55 (commencing with Section 1000.7) of Title 6 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, relating to crimes.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1004, as amended, Hill. Young adults: deferred entry of judgment pilot program.

Existing law provides that entry of judgment may be deferred with respect to a defendant who is charged with certain crimes involving possession of controlled substances, who pleads guilty to the charge or charges, and who meets certain criteria, including that he or she has no prior convictions for any offense involving controlled substances and has had no felony convictions within the 5 years prior, as specified. Existing law requires the criminal charge or charges to be dismissed if the defendant has performed satisfactorily in a specified program during the period in which deferred entry of judgment was granted.

This bill would authorize specified counties to establish a pilot program to operate a deferred entry of judgment pilot program for eligible defendants. The bill would authorize a defendant to participate in the program within the county’s juvenile hall if that person is charged with committing a felony offense, except as specified, he or she pleads guilty to the charge or charges, and the probation department determines that the person meets specified requirements, including that the defendant is 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age on the date the offense was committed, is suitable for the program, and shows the ability to benefit from services generally reserved for delinquents. The bill would require the probation department to develop a plan for reentry services.

The bill would require the court to grant deferred entry of judgment if the eligible defendant consents to participate in the program, waives his or her right to a speedy trial or a speedy preliminary hearing, pleads guilty to the charge or charges, and waives time for the pronouncement of judgment. The bill would also require the court to render a finding of guilt to the charge or charges pleaded, enter judgment, and schedule a sentencing hearing, and would require the return of the defendant to custody in a county jail if the court finds that the defendant is performing unsatisfactorily in the program or that the defendant is not benefiting from the services in the program. If the defendant has performed satisfactorily during the period in which deferred entry of judgment was granted, at the end of that period, the bill would require the court to dismiss the criminal charge or charges.

The bill would require a county, prior to establishing a pilot program, to apply to the Board of State and Community Corrections for approval of a county institution as a suitable place for confinement for the purpose of the pilot program. The bill would require the board to review and approve or deny the application of the county within 30 days of receiving notice of this proposed use. The bill would also require each county to establish a multidisciplinary team consisting of representatives of specified local entities. The team would be required to meet periodically to review and discuss the implementation, practices, and impact of the program.

The bill would require the probation department to submit data relating to the effectiveness of the program to the Division of Recidivism Reduction and Re-Entry, within the Department of Justice. The bill would prohibit a defendant participating in the program from coming into contact with minors within the juvenile hall, would prohibit a defendant from serving longer than one year in custody within a county’s juvenile hall pursuant to the program, and would require the board to review a county’s pilot program to ensure compliance with the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as specified.

The bill would require a county that establishes a pilot program pursuant to these provisions to submit data regarding the pilot program to the board, and would require the board to conduct an evaluation of the pilot program’s impact and effectiveness, as specified. The bill would require the evaluation to be combined into a comprehensive report and submitted to the Assembly and Senate begin delete Public Safety Committees. end delete begin insert Committees on Public Safety. end insert The bill would also authorize the board to contract with an independent entity, including, but not limited to, the Regents of the University of California, to carry out these duties.

The authority conferred by this bill would be repealed on January 1, 2020.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Alameda, Butte, Napa, Nevada, and Santa Clara.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.  

Chapter 2.55 (commencing with Section 1000.7)
is added to Title 6 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, to read:

 

Chapter  2.55. Deferred Entry of Judgment Pilot
Program

 

1000.7.  

(a) The following counties may establish a pilot
program pursuant to this section to operate a deferred entry of
judgment pilot program for eligible defendants described in
subdivision (b):

(1) County of Alameda.

(2) County of Butte.

(3) County of Napa.

(4) County of Nevada.

(5) County of Santa Clara.

(b) A defendant may participate in a deferred entry of judgment
pilot program within the county’s juvenile hall if that person is
charged with committing a felony offense, other than the offenses
listed under subdivision (d), he or she pleads guilty to the charge
or charges, and the probation department determines that the person
meets all of the following requirements:

(1) Is 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age on the
date the offense was committed.

(2) Is suitable for the program after evaluation using a risk
assessment tool, as described in subdivision (c).

(3) Shows the ability to benefit from services generally reserved
for delinquents, including, but not limited to, cognitive behavioral
therapy, other mental health services, and age-appropriate
educational, vocational, and supervision services, that are currently
deployed under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.

(4) Meets the rules of the juvenile begin delete hall. end delete begin insert hall developed in
accordance with the applicable regulations set forth in Title 15 of
the California Code of Regulations. end insert

(5) Does not have a prior or current conviction for committing
an offense listed under subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 or
subdivision (c) of Section begin delete 667.5. end delete begin insert 667.5, or subdivision (b) of
Section 707 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. end insert

(6) Is not required to register as a sex offender pursuant to
Chapter 5.5 (commencing with Section 290) of Title 9 of Part 1.

(c) The probation department, in consultation with the superior
court, district attorney, and sheriff of the county or the
governmental body charged with operating the county jail, shall
develop an evaluation process using a risk assessment tool to
determine eligibility for the program.

(d)  begin delete The commission by the defendant of end delete begin insert If the defendant is
required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Chapter 5.5
(commencing with Section 290) of Title 9 of Part 1, or if he or she
has been convicted of end insert one or more of the following begin delete offenses makes
him or her end delete begin insert offenses, he or she is end insert not eligible for the program:

(1) An offense listed under subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.

(2) An offense listed under subdivision (c) of Section 667.5.

(3) An offense listed under subdivision (b) of Section 707 of
the Welfare and Institutions Code.

(e) The court shall grant deferred entry of judgment if an eligible
defendant consents to participate in the program, waives his or her
right to a speedy trial or a speedy preliminary hearing, pleads guilty
to the charge or charges, and waives time for the pronouncement
of judgment.

(f) (1) If the probation begin delete officer end delete begin insert department end insert determines that the
defendant is not eligible for the deferred entry of judgment pilot
program or the defendant does not consent to participate in the
program, the proceedings shall continue as in any other case.

(2) If it appears to the probation department that the defendant
is performing unsatisfactorily in the program as a result of the
commission of a new crime or the violation of any of the rules of
the juvenile hall or that the defendant is not benefiting from the
services in the program, the probation department may make a
motion for entry of judgment. After notice to the defendant, the
court shall hold a hearing to determine whether judgment should
be entered. If the court finds that the defendant is performing
unsatisfactorily in the program or that the defendant is not
benefiting from the services in the program, the court shall render
a finding of guilt to the charge or charges pleaded, enter judgment,
and schedule a sentencing hearing as otherwise provided in this
code, and the probation department, in consultation with the county
sheriff, shall remove the defendant from the program and return
him or her to custody in county jail. The mechanism of when and
how the defendant is moved from custody in juvenile hall to
custody in a county jail shall be determined by the local begin delete justice
stakeholders. end delete begin insert multidisciplinary team specified in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (m). end insert

(3) If the defendant has performed satisfactorily during the
period in which deferred entry of judgment was granted, at the end
of that period, the court shall dismiss the criminal charge or
charges.

(g) A defendant shall serve no longer than one year in custody
within a county’s juvenile hall pursuant to the program.

(h) The probation department shall develop a plan for reentry
services, including, but not limited to, housing, employment, and
education services, as a component of the program.

(i) The probation department shall submit data relating to the
effectiveness of the program to the Division of Recidivism
Reduction and Re-Entry, within the Department of Justice,
including recidivism rates for program participants as compared
to recidivism rates for similar populations in the adult system
within the county.

(j) A defendant participating in the program pursuant to this
section shall not come into contact with minors within the juvenile
hall for any purpose, including, but not limited to, housing,
recreation, or education.

(k) Prior to establishing a pilot program pursuant to this section,
the county shall apply to the Board of State and Community
Corrections for approval of a county institution as a suitable place
for confinement for the purpose of the pilot program. The board
shall review and approve or deny the application of the county
within 30 days of receiving notice of this proposed use. In its
review, the board shall take into account the available
programming, capacity, and safety of the institution as a place for
the confinement and rehabilitation of individuals within the
jurisdiction of the criminal court, and those within the jurisdiction
of the juvenile court.

(l) The Board of State and Community Corrections shall review
a county’s pilot program to ensure compliance with requirements
of the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of
1974 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 5601 et seq.), as amended, relating to “sight
and sound” separation between juveniles and adult inmates.

(m) (1) This section applies to a defendant who would otherwise
serve time in custody in a county jail. Participation in a program
pursuant to this section shall not be authorized as an alternative to
a sentence involving community supervision.

(2) Each county shall establish a multidisciplinary team that
shall meet periodically to review and discuss the implementation,
practices, and impact of the program. The team shall include
representatives from the following:

(A) Probation department.

(B) The district attorney’s office.

(C) The public defender’s office.

(D) The sheriff’s department.

(E) Courts located in the county.

(F) The county board of supervisors.

(G) The county health and human services department.

(H) A youth advocacy group.

(n) (1) A county that establishes a pilot program pursuant to
this section shall submit data regarding the pilot program to the
Board of State and Community begin delete Corrections. end delete begin insert Corrections. The data
submitted shall be used for the purposes of paragraph (2). end insert

(2) The board shall conduct an evaluation of the pilot program’s
impact and effectiveness. The evaluation shall include, but not be
limited to, evaluating each pilot program’s impact on sentencing
and impact on opportunities for community supervision, monitoring
the program’s effect on minors in the juvenile facility, if any, and
its effectiveness with respect to program participants, including
outcome-related data for program participants compared to young
adult offenders sentenced for comparable crimes.

(3) Each evaluation shall be combined into a comprehensive
report and submitted to the Assembly and Senate Committees on
Public Safety.

(4) The board may contract with an independent entity,
including, but not limited to, the Regents of the University of
California, for the purposes of carrying out the duties of the board
pursuant to this subdivision.

(o) This chapter shall remain in effect only until January 1,
2020, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
that is enacted before January 1, 2020, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 2.  

The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
Constitution because of the unique circumstances in the Counties
of Alameda, Butte, Napa, Nevada, and Santa Clara. Recent research
on the adolescent brain development has found that brain
development continues well after an individual reaches 18 years
of age. This bill would therefore allow for the criminal justice
system to apply the most recent brain development research to its
practices in these counties by allowing certain transitional age
youth access to age-appropriate rehabilitative services available
in the juvenile justice system when an assessment determines that
the individual would benefit from the services, with the aim of
reducing the likelihood of the youth continuing in the criminal
justice system.