BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 1015 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 10, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair SB 1015 (Leyva) - As Introduced February 11, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy | Labor |Vote:| | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill deletes the January 1, 2017, repeal date on provisions under the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, thereby making the overtime compensation for domestic workers requirement permanent. FISCAL EFFECT: No significant state costs. SB 1015 Page 2 COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. AB 241(Ammiano), Chapter 374, Statutes of 2013, enacted the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights. This law entitles a domestic work employee who is employed as a personal attendant to overtime compensation, if the employee works in excess of 9 hours in any workday or more than 45 hours in any workweek, to be compensated at the rate of 1 times the regular rate of pay. These provisions of law are set to sunset on January 1, 2017. This bill removes the repeal date, thereby making overtime compensation for domestic workers permanent. AB 241 also required the Governor to convene a committee to study and report on the effects of this law on personal attendants and their employers. The Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) has convened meetings and solicited input from stakeholders, but a report has not yet been released. LWDA indicates that the report will be released this summer. 2)Support. According to the sponsor, the California Domestic Workers Coalition, domestic workers are primarily immigrant women that, as a result of the uneven application of labor laws, have been denied basic protections afforded to other workers. Domestic workers often work around the clock to fulfill the requests of their employers and meet the needs of their own families. The unique nature of their work and constant isolation permits unscrupulous employers to exploit this hard-working labor force. The Coalition states that by making the law permanent, the legislature will dignify this profession, and the work of supporting our families, seniors, and people with disabilities. 3)Opposition. The California Association for Health Services at Home (CAHSAH) opposes this bill. CAHSAH is concerned with the permanent extension of overtime compensation for domestic SB 1015 Page 3 workers without knowing how the law has impacted the employment of personal attendants that provide private home care services to seniors and other frail Californians. Disability Rights California (DRC) is also opposed to this bill. They state the AB 241 debate was long and painful and did not resolve the issues which should unite rather than divide two groups: low-income personal care workers and low-income people with disabilities who employ them. DRC states they support the rights of workers to be treated fairly, and also support the rights of people with disabilities to live in their own homes, work and function in their communities. Unfortunately, they state, AB 241 lumped low-income people with disabilities, who rely on their attendants for their survival and functioning, with wealthy people who could do their own chores but have money enough to hire somebody else to do them. The DRC states the claim that AB 241 has been a great success does not seem to be supported by any data on its effect on people with disabilities. Analysis Prepared by:Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916) 319-2081