SB 1018, as introduced, Liu. California Environmental Quality Act: State Route 710 North Study.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a public review period for a draft EIR of a project and requires the lead agency to consider the comments submitted during the review period and to respond to the comments.
This bill would deem a certain cost-benefit analysis prepared for the State Route 710 North Study to be a technical study to be included in the comprehensive analysis of the alternatives described in the draft EIR for the State Route 710 North Study and would require the lead agency to consider and respond, in writing, to any comments regarding the analysis submitted during the public review period.
This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for State Route 710 North Study.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 54237.9 is added to the Government
2Code, to read:
Notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of the
4California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing
5with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code), the cost-benefit
6analysis prepared for the State Route 710 North Study in response
7to a motion approved by the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles
8County Metropolitan Transportation Authority at the June 2010
9meeting is deemed to be a technical study to be included in the
10comprehensive analysis of the alternatives described in the draft
11environmental impart report/environmental impact statement for
12the project, issued in March, 2015. The lead agency, pursuant to
13Section 21091 of the Public Resources Code, shall consider and
14respond, in writing, to comments regarding the cost-benefits
15analysis submitted during the public comment period for the draft
16environmental
impact report/environmental impact statement. The
17comments on the analysis and the lead agency’s responses are
18deemed to be a part of the record of proceedings for purposes of
19the California Environmental Quality Act.
The Legislature finds and declares that a special law
21is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable
22within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
23Constitution because of the unique circumstances regarding the
24State Route 710 North Study.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
26immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
27the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
28immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
29To ensure that comments on the cost-benefit analysis prepared
30for the State Route 710 North Study in response to a motion
31approved by the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles County
P3 1Metropolitan Transportation Authority at the June 2010 meeting
2are adequately considered and responded to during the
3environmental review process required pursuant to the California
4Environmental Quality Act, it is necessary for this measure to take
5effect immediately.
O
99