BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session SB 1053 (Leno) - Housing discrimination: applications ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: April 4, 2016 |Policy Vote: JUD. 4 - 2 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: Yes | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: April 18, 2016 |Consultant: Jolie Onodera | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for the referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: SB 1053 would increase the protections against housing discrimination on the basis of one's source of income under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) by revising the definition of "source of income" to include lawful, verifiable income paid to a housing owner or landlord on behalf of a tenant, including federal, state, or local public assistance or housing subsidies, including, but not limited to, federal housing assistance vouchers under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as specified. Fiscal Impact: SB 1053 (Leno) Page 1 of ? DFEH workload : Potentially significant increase in housing discrimination complaints received under the revised definition of "source of income" required to be reviewed and investigated. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) estimates additional staffing could potentially be required at a cost in excess of $350,000 (General Fund) annually to address the additional workload. Local Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) : To the extent higher utilization rates of housing assistance programs result from this measure, local PHA administrative costs could increase significantly. Administrative services provided by PHAs include outreach to tenants and owners, waiting list management, determination of client eligibility, issuance of vouchers, tenant and owner briefings, housing quality standards inspections, annual re-certifications, interim adjustments, and records maintenance. HCD/CalHFA : No fiscal information was available from HCD/CalHFA at the time of this analysis. Staff notes the responsibility for acting as the PHA under the Section 8 voucher program for 12 rural counties was transferred from the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to local and regional housing authorities in 2012. County counsel : Potential minor increase in time required to review and approve Restrictive Covenant Modification documents. These costs are potentially state-reimbursable (General Fund) to the extent the Commission on State Mandates determines the revised definition of "source of income" expands upon a formerly mandated higher level of service on county counsel to determine whether there exists an unlawfully restrictive covenant based on source of income, as redefined under the provisions of this bill. County recorders : Non-reimbursable local costs to county recorders to accept and record additional Restrictive Covenant Modification documents, as county recorders are authorized to charge or waive fees for this service. Impact on public social services : To the extent the provisions of this bill provide greater opportunities for persons to secure housing, greater utilization of federal vouchers could be realized, as well as potential future cost savings in reduced reliance on other federal, state, and local public social services. Background: The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) SB 1053 (Leno) Page 2 of ? prohibits employment and housing discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, or genetic information of that person. (Government Code (GC) § 12920.) The FEHA additionally provides that the opportunities to seek, obtain, and hold employment and housing without facing discrimination is a civil right. (GC § 12921.) The FEHA protects against housing discrimination on the basis of one's "source of income," which is defined as the "lawful, verifiable income paid directly to a tenant or paid to a representative of a tenant," and states that "a landlord is not considered a representative of a tenant" for purposes of this definition. (GC §§ 12927(i), 12955(p).) Federal housing assistance programs such as the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program, more commonly referred to as "Section 8 vouchers," provide assistance in the form of vouchers that can be used to acquire housing on the private market to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing to low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled. At the state level, public assistance programs such as the Housing Opportunity for People with AIDS (HOPWA) and HOME provide tenant-based rental assistance to eligible persons. Additionally, California recently established the Housing Support Program (HSP) pursuant to SB 855 (Chapter 29/2014) for eligible CalWORKs families. However, despite the availability of such housing assistance programs, some program participants may face challenges finding landlords willing to accept housing assistance payments in their communities. This bill seeks to ensure that landlords do not deny low-income families and other vulnerable populations the opportunity to apply for available housing by expanding protections against housing discrimination under the FEHA by revising the definition of "source of income" to include income paid to a housing owner or landlord on behalf of a tenant, including federal, state, or local public assistance or subsidies. SB 1053 (Leno) Page 3 of ? Proposed Law: This bill would expand the definition of "source of income" under the FEHA to include lawful, verifiable income paid to a housing owner or landlord on behalf of a tenant, including federal, state, or local public assistance and federal, state, or local housing subsidies, including, but not limited to, federal housing assistance vouchers under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as specified. Prior Legislation: AB 447 (Maienschein) Chapter 432/2015 prohibited real property insurers from, among other things, failing or refusing to accept an application, issue, or cancel a policy based on the level or source of income of individuals residing or intending to reside on the real property, or based on the receipt of assistance intended for housing from government agencies or other specified persons. SB 1252 (Corbett) Chapter 524/2010 made technical revisions to several provisions of the FEHA, including consistently listing "source of income" as a characteristic that is protected from housing discrimination in various sections of the FEHA. SB 1145 (Burton) Chapter 568/2004, among its provisions, removed the sunset date and thereby extended indefinitely the provision adopted in SB 1098 which prohibited discrimination under the FEHA on the basis of a person's source of income, as specified. SB 1098 (Burton) Chapter 590/1999 prohibited, until January 1, 2005, discrimination under the FEHA on the basis of a person's source of income, the failure to account for the aggregate income of co-residents, or the failure to exclude a government rent subsidy from that portion of the rent to be paid by the tenant in assessing his or her eligibility for rental housing. SB 1148 (Burton) Chapter 589/1999 required title insurance companies, real estate brokers, county recorders and others to include in a copy of a declaration, governing document, or deed a cover page (or to stamp the first page of the document) that states that any discriminatory restriction contained in the document is a violation of state and federal fair housing laws and is void. SB 1148 also required county recorders to remove "blatant racial restrictions" when requested to do so by anyone SB 1053 (Leno) Page 4 of ? having an interest in the property. Staff Comments: By expanding the definition of "source of income" under the FEHA, the DFEH has indicated the potential for additional housing discrimination complaints to be filed. Based on data from 10 other jurisdictions (including 8 other states and the District of Columbia) that prohibit housing discrimination based on source of income and include tenant-based rental assistance in that definition, the DFEH has estimated the number of complaints could increase by 175 complaints per year (which would result in a 120 percent increase over the number of complaints received based on source of income in 2014), resulting in a potential need for additional staffing in excess of $350,000 annually to review and investigate the additional complaints. Staff notes there are timeframes within which specified housing complaints must be reviewed and investigated. As indicated in its March 2015, "Report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee," the DFEH states that the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires DFEH to complete 50 percent of its investigations of housing complaints within 100 days of the filing of the complaints which are "dual-filed," which are complaints over which both the DFEH and HUD have jurisdiction and are filed with both entities. Local public housing agencies (PHAs) are the primary administrators of the federal Section 8 voucher program. In California, over 100 PHAs administer housing assistance programs and receive federal funds from HUD to administer the voucher program. Prior to 2012, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) acted as the PHA in the administration of the Section 8 voucher program in 12 rural counties, however, this responsibility was transferred from HCD to local and regional housing authorities effective January 1, 2012. To the extent the provisions of this bill result in a significant increase in utilization rates of housing assistance programs such as the federal Section 8 voucher program, administrative costs to local PHAs could increase significantly. Administrative services provided by PHAs include outreach to tenants and owners, waiting list management, determination of client eligibility, issuance of vouchers, tenant and owner briefings, housing quality standards inspections, annual re-certifications, interim SB 1053 (Leno) Page 5 of ? adjustments, and records maintenance. Under the FEHA, responsibility for the procedure by which unlawful restrictive covenants may be removed was transferred from the DFEH to local county recorders in 2006. By expanding the definition of "source of income" under the FEHA, this bill could result in additional restrictive covenant modification forms being submitted to county recorders which would require review and approval by the county counsel prior to recordation by the county recorder. To the extent the time required to review and approve of Restrictive Covenant Modification documents increases due to the provisions of this bill, these costs are potentially state-reimbursable (General Fund) to the extent the Commission on State Mandates determines the revised definition of "source of income" expands upon a formerly mandated higher level of service on county counsel to determine whether there exists an unlawfully restrictive covenant based on source of income. -- END --