Amended in Senate March 28, 2016

Senate BillNo. 1079


Introduced by Senator Glazer

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Baker)

February 17, 2016


An act to addbegin delete Section 295.3 toend deletebegin insert Article 8 (commencing with Section 301) to Chapter 6 of Title 9 of Part 1 ofend insert the Penal Code, relating to DNA evidence.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1079, as amended, Glazer. DNA evidence: CODIS Hit Outcome Project.

Existing law, the DNA and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Act of 1998, provides that the Department of Justice, through its DNA Laboratory, is responsible for the management and administration of the state’s DNA and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Program. Existing law prohibits the DNA and forensic identification database and databank from being used as a source of genetic material for testing, research, orbegin delete experiments,end deletebegin insert experimentsend insert by any person, agency, or entity seeking to find a causal link between genetics and behavior or health.

This bill wouldbegin delete find and declare that the Department of Justice manages and administersend deletebegin insert establishend insert the CODIS Hit Outcome Project (CHOP) databasebegin delete andend deletebegin insert in, and would require that the database be administered and managed by, the department. The billend insert would impose various requirements and restrictions relating to the CHOPbegin delete databaseend deletebegin insert database,end insert including, among other things,begin insert a requirement that every city, county, or state laboratory participating in CODIS enter into the database data specified by the department upon notification that a CODIS hit has occurred,end insert a prohibitionbegin delete ofend deletebegin insert againstend insert the CHOP database containing DNAbegin delete profilesend deletebegin insert profiles,end insert and a requirement thatbegin delete certain entities, including, among others,end deletebegin insert eachend insert law enforcementbegin delete agencies and county probation departments,end deletebegin insert agency within California responsible for the investigation or prosecution of a case involving a DNA database match to a California offenderend insert report to the Department of Justice, through the CHOP database, thebegin insert status orend insert outcome ofbegin insert thatend insert investigativebegin delete leads provided by the state’s DNA Database and Data Bank Program.end deletebegin insert lead.end insert The bill would require abegin delete countyend deletebegin insert city, county, or city and countyend insert to be reimbursed for the cost of reporting that information to the Department of Justice.begin insert By imposing a higher level of service on local entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.end insert

begin insert

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

end insert
begin insert

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

end insert

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1begin insert

begin insertSECTION 1.end insert  

end insert

begin insertArticle 8 (commencing with Section 301) is added
2to Chapter 6 of Title 9 of Part 1 of the end insert
begin insertPenal Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert

3 

4Article begin insert8.end insert  CHOP Database
5

 

6

begin insert301.end insert  

(a) For purposes of this article, the following definitions
7shall apply:

8
(b) “CODIS” means the California Combined DNA Index
9System.

10
(c) “CHOP database” refers to the CODIS Hit Outcome Project
11database.

12
(d) “Department” means the Department of Justice.

13

begin insert301.1.end insert  

(a) There is hereby established in the department the
14CHOP database.

P3    1
(b) The CHOP database shall be managed and administered
2by the department.

3

begin insert301.2.end insert  

(a) The CHOP database shall provide a
4restricted-access repository for tracking the occurrence and
5consequences of DNA database hits, such that information with
6investigatory value may be shared among affected law enforcement
7agencies and the efficacy of the state’s DNA database may be
8monitored and reported upon by the state.

9
(b) (1) Every city, county, or state laboratory in California
10participating in CODIS shall, upon notification by the department
11that a CODIS hit has occurred, enter into the CHOP database the
12data specified by the department.

13
(2) On a schedule set forth by the department, and pursuant to
14instructions published by the department, each law enforcement
15agency within California responsible for the investigation or
16prosecution of a case involving a DNA database match to a
17California offender shall report to the department, through the
18CHOP database, the status or outcome of that investigative lead.

19
(3) A city, county, or city and county shall be reimbursed for
20the costs of complying with paragraph (2).

21
(c) (1) The CHOP database shall contain records of indexed
22information related to DNA hits and case-to-case matches,
23including, but not limited to, the identity of the submitting crime
24laboratory, the investigating law enforcement agency, a district
25attorney contact, offender information, investigation status, and
26resulting criminal charges and conviction information, if any.

27
(2) The CHOP database shall not contain DNA profiles.

28
(3) (A) Information collected by the department pursuant to
29this section is investigatory in nature, and shall be deemed official
30information and subject to the disclosure protections of Sections
311040 and 1041 of the Evidence Code.

32
(B) Nothing in this section shall require the department, or a
33local law enforcement agency, to disclose any information
34protected under Section 1040 or 1041 of the Evidence Code, or
35Section 6254 of the Government Code.

end insert
36begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert
begin insert

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
37this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
38local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
39pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
404 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

end insert
begin delete
P4    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 295.3 is added to the Penal Code, 2immediately following Section 295.2, to read:

3

295.3.  

(a) The Legislature finds and declares both of the
4following:

5(1) The Department of Justice, through its DNA Laboratory,
6manages and administers the CODIS Hit Outcome Project (CHOP)
7database.

8(2) The purpose of the CHOP database is to provide a central
9repository for confidential law enforcement data-sharing of case
10information related to DNA database hits.

11(b) (1) The CHOP database shall not contain DNA profiles.

12(2) The CHOP database shall contain records of indexed
13information related to DNA hits and case-to-case matches,
14 including, but not limited to, the identity of the submitting crime
15laboratory, the investigating law enforcement agency, a district
16attorney contact, and offender information, including criminal
17charges and conviction information.

18(c) (1) Except to the extent required by the United States
19Constitution or the California Constitution, the Department of
20Justice, a law enforcement agency, a local, state, or federal
21prosecutorial entity, a crime laboratory, or a federal, state, or local
22agency shall not be compelled to provide information from or
23about the CHOP database in any criminal or civil proceeding.

24(2) The Department of Justice shall not release case specific
25information that the investigating law enforcement agency has
26requested to keep confidential because its release would impair a
27pending criminal investigation.

28(d) (1) On a schedule set forth by the Department of Justice,
29the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and each law
30enforcement agency, medical examiner, coroner, public fire
31department investigator, state mental health investigator, county
32probation department, district attorney, and any other participating
33entity shall report to the Department of Justice, through the CHOP
34database, the outcome of investigative leads provided by the state’s
35DNA Database and Data Bank Program, in a format approved by
36the Department of Justice DNA Laboratory.

37(2) A county shall be reimbursed for the costs of complying
38with paragraph (1).

end delete


O

    98