BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1084|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 1084
          Author:   Hancock (D) 
          Amended:  8/18/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:  5-2, 4/19/16
           AYES:  Hancock, Glazer, Leno, Liu, Monning
           NOES:  Anderson, Stone

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR:  26-11, 5/26/16
           AYES:  Allen, Beall, Block, Cannella, De León, Glazer, Hall,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara,  
            Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan,  
            Pavley, Roth, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NOES:  Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach,  
            Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Stone, Vidak
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Galgiani, Huff, Runner

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  49-29, 8/22/16 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Sentencing


          SOURCE:    Human Rights Watch
          
          DIGEST:   This bill makes technical non-substantive changes to  
          the provisions allowing a person who was under 18 years of age  
          when sentenced to life without parole to submit a petition for  
          resentencing.

          Assembly Amendments add double-jointing language to address  
          potential chaptering problems.









                                                                    SB 1084  
                                                                    Page  2



          ANALYSIS:   

          Existing law:

          1)Authorizes a prisoner who was under 18 years of age at the  
            time of committing an offense for which the prisoner was  
            sentenced to life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) to  
            submit a petition for recall and resentencing after he or she  
            has served at least 15 years of his or her sentence. (Penal  
            Code § 1170(d) (2)(A)(i))

          2)Provides that if the court finds by a preponderance of the  
            evidence that the statements in the petition are true the  
            court shall hold a hearing to consider whether to recall the  
            sentences and commitment previously ordered to resentence the  
            defendant. (Penal Code § 1170(d) (2)(E))

          3)Provides that if a sentence is not recalled, the defendant may  
            submit another petition for recall and resentencing again  
            after having served 20 and 24 years. (Penal Code § 1170(d)  
            (2)(H))

          This bill:

          1)Clarifies that the person convicted for a crime committed  
            while under the age of 18 and sentenced to LWOP can submit a  
            petition after he or she has been incarcerated at least 15  
            years.

          2)Provides that if the court finds by a preponderance of the  
            evidence that one or more of the statements specified is true,  
            the court shall recall the sentence and commitment previously  
            ordered and hold a hearing to resentence the defendant.

          3)Clarifies that the defendant may submit another petition if it  
            the sentence is not recalled or the defendant is resentenced  
            to LWOP.

          4)Clarifies that nothing in the provisions dealing with the  
            ability of a person to seek a resentencing is intended to  
            diminish or abrogate any rights or remedies otherwise  
            available.








                                                                    SB 1084  
                                                                    Page  3




          5)Makes other technical amendments.

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, minor  
          absorbable annual GF costs to the state trial courts. 


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/22/16)


          Human Rights Watch (source)
          California Public Defenders Association 


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/22/16)


          None received


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     According to the sponsor Human Rights  
          Watch:

            In 2012, California created a judicial review process for  
            cases in which people under the age of 18 have been  
            sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. It  
            was the first law of its type in the country. Our work on  
            the issue of life without parole for juveniles has led to  
            contact with attorneys representing youth offenders in  
            these hearings. We believe there are areas where the law  
            is unclear as written and leading to different  
            interpretations in different courtrooms. It is our hope  
            that this bill will clarify the language of the law and  
            ensure consistency in practice across the state.
           
           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  49-29, 8/22/16
           AYES: Arambula, Atkins, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke,  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Dababneh, Daly,  








                                                                    SB 1084  
                                                                    Page  4



            Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto,  
            Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Roger Hernández,  
            Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lopez, Low, McCarty, Medina,  
            Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,  
            Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Williams,  
            Wood, Rendon
           NOES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Brough,  
            Chang, Chávez, Dahle, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Hadley,  
            Harper, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Maienschein,  
            Mathis, Mayes, Obernolte, Olsen, Patterson, Steinorth, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Wilk
           NO VOTE RECORDED: Cooper, Melendez



          Prepared by:Mary Kennedy / PUB. S. / 
          8/22/16 22:49:38


                                   ****  END  ****