BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1120


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          1120 (Wolk)


          As Amended  August 15, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  37-0


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                   |Noes                 |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Accountability  |8-0  |Cristina Garcia,       |                     |
          |                |     |Lackey, Burke,         |                     |
          |                |     |Frazier, Beth Gaines,  |                     |
          |                |     |Irwin, Medina,         |                     |
          |                |     |Rodriguez              |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,     |                     |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, |                     |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang, Daly, |                     |
          |                |     |Eggman, Gallagher,     |                     |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,        |                     |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,         |                     |
          |                |     |Obernolte, Quirk,      |                     |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,      |                     |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood, Chau      |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |








                                                                    SB 1120


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |                       |                     |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Allows the Director of the Department of General  
          Services (DGS) to renew existing lease agreements with the Napa  
          and Solano County Offices of Education (COE) for the operation  
          of special needs and alternative education programs on land  
          located within the grounds of Napa State Hospital and the  
          Medical Facility at Vacaville, respectively.  Specifically, this  
          bill:  


          1)Authorizes the director of DGS, with the consent of the  
            Department of State Hospitals (DSH) and the California  
            Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR),  
            respectively, to enter into lease agreements with a nonprofit  
            corporation or public governmental agency, for the purpose of  
            conducting special needs and alternative education programs on  
            land located within the grounds of Napa State Hospital (NSH)  
            and the Medical Facility at Vacaville, respectively.
          2)Specifies that the leases may be renewed for an additional  
            period of no more than 50 years. 


          3)Clarifies that the director of DGS shall periodically review  
            the lease of land within the Medical Facility at Vacaville  
            every five years and make adjustments, if necessary.


          4)Deletes obsolete provisions relating to the construction of  
            permanent facilities on the leased land, as they have already  
            been built, and makes other technical changes.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor one-time administrative costs to DGS, to be  
          reimbursed by the COEs, and minor ongoing lease revenues.









                                                                    SB 1120


                                                                    Page  3






          COMMENTS:  According to the author, this bill is needed to allow  
          the sponsors, the Napa and Solano COEs, to continue providing  
          educational services and learning support to special needs  
          students at the Napa COE Education Center located on the grounds  
          of NSH and the Irene Larsen Educational Center located on the  
          grounds of the Medical Facility at Vacaville.  


          While current law gives DGS the authority to enter into these  
          lease arrangements with the Napa and Solano COEs for specified  
          educational purposes, it does not permit the leases to be  
          renewed.  The Solano COE is particularly concerned because its  
          lease with DGS is set to expire in January 2018.  The author  
          reports that DGS, CDCR, and the Solano COE all intend to renew  
          the lease and this bill provides the necessary statutory  
          authorization to execute a new lease by specifying an additional  
          50-year lease renewal period.  


          This bill also clarifies that the COEs can lease directly from  
          the state (rather than through a nonprofit), and updates  
          language used to describe these educational programs.   
          Specifically, it replaces the outdated phrase "mentally-retarded  
          program" with the term "special needs and alternative education  
          programs" instead.


          The sponsors add that the 50-year lease renewal provision in  
          this bill will also allow the COEs to access state funds to  
          modernize these facilities.  They note that COEs do not have  
          bonding capacity to raise local funds and therefore must qualify  
          for state funding to meet their facility needs, including a  
          requirement for the facility to have a lease of at least 40  
          years. 












                                                                    SB 1120


                                                                    Page  4





          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Cassie Royce / A. & A.R. / (916) 319-3600  FN:  
          0004188