BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          1121 (Leno)


          As Amended  August 1, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  36-0


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Privacy         |11-0 |Chau, Wilk, Baker,    |                    |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang,      |                    |
          |                |     |Cooper, Dababneh,     |                    |
          |                |     |Gatto, Gordon, Low,   |                    |
          |                |     |Olsen                 |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Public Safety   |7-0  |Jones-Sawyer,         |                    |
          |                |     |Melendez, Lackey,     |                    |
          |                |     |Lopez, Low, Quirk,    |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago              |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |19-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,    |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Daly, Eggman,         |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher,            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,       |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,        |                    |
          |                |     |Obernolte, Quirk,     |                    |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,     |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood, Chu      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Revises the California Electronic Communications  
          Privacy Act (CalECPA) to authorize a government entity to  
          access, without a warrant, the location or phone number of an  
          electronic device used to call 911; allows a government entity  
          to retain voluntarily received electronic communication  
          information beyond 90 days if the service provider or subscriber  
          is or discloses information to, a correctional or detention  
          facility; and excludes driver's licenses and other  
          identification cards from its provisions.  Specifically, this  
          bill:


          1)Clarifies that the definition of an "electronic device" does  
            not include the magnetic strip on a driver's license or an  
            identification card issued by this state or a driver's license  
            or equivalent identification card issued by another state. 


          2)Clarifies that a government entity may access electronic  
            device information by means of physical interaction or  
            electronic communication with the device, except where  
            prohibited by state or federal law, if the device is found in  
            an area of any correctional facility or a secure area of a  
            local detention facility where inmates have access, not just  
            areas under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections  








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  3





            and Rehabilitation. 


          3)Authorizes a government entity to access electronic device  
            information by means of physical interaction or electronic  
            communication with the device if the device is seized from an  
            authorized possessor who is serving a term of parole, as  
            specified.


          4)Authorizes a government entity to access electronic device  
            information by means of physical interaction or electronic  
            communication with the device if the device is seized from an  
            authorized possessor who is subject to an electronic device  
            search as a clear and unambiguous condition of probation,  
            postrelease community supervision, mandatory supervision, or  
            pretrial release, as specified.


          5)Authorizes a government entity to access electronic device  
            information by means of physical interaction or electronic  
            communication with the device if the government entity  
            accesses information concerning the location or the telephone  
            number of the electronic device in order to respond to an  
            emergency 911 call from that device


          6)Clarifies that, in granting a warrant for electronic  
            information, a court may determine that the warrant need not  
            specify time periods because of the specific circumstances of  
            the investigation, including, but not limited to, the nature  
            of the device to be searched. 


          7)Clarifies that, in granting a warrant for electronic  
            information, information obtained through the execution of the  
            warrant must be sealed and may not be subject to further  
            review, use or disclosure, except pursuant to a court order or  
            to comply with discovery requirements, as specified.  








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  4







          8)Requires a government entity, if it receives electronic  
            communication information that was voluntarily provided, to  
            destroy that information within 90 days unless the service  
            provider or subscriber is, or discloses the information to, a  
            federal, state, or local prison, jail, or juvenile detention  
            facility, and all participants to the electronic communication  
            were informed, prior to the communication, that the service  
            provider may disclose the information to the government  
            entity. 


          9)Clarifies that if a government entity obtains electronic  
            information pursuant to an emergency involving danger of death  
            or serious physical injury to a person that requires access to  
            the electronic information without delay, the government  
            entity must file an application for a warrant or order, or a  
            motion of approval of the disclosures, within three court  
            days, as specified.


          10)Clarifies that a government entity that obtains electronic  
            information pursuant to an emergency involving danger of death  
            or serious physical injury to a person, the government entity  
            need not file an application for a warrant or order, or a  
            motion of approval of the disclosures, if the government  
            entity obtains information concerning the location of the  
            electronic device in order to respond to an emergency 911 call  
            from that device.


          11)Clarifies that any government entity that obtains electronic  
            information in an emergency situation must serve notice on the  
            identified target, as specified, within three court days after  
            obtaining the electronic information.  


          12)Clarifies that the provisions of CalECPA may not be construed  








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  5





            to alter the authority of a government entity that owns an  
            electronic device to compel an employee who is authorized to  
            possess the device to return the device to the government  
            entity's possession. 


          13)Makes other technical or nonsubstantive changes. 


          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Provides, pursuant to the United States (U.S.) Constitution,  
            that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons,  
            houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and  
            seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue,  
            but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and  
            particularly describing the place to be searched and the  
            persons or things to be seized."  (U.S. Constitution amendment  
            IV)


          2)Enacts CalECPA, which generally prohibits a government entity  
            from compelling the production of or access to electronic  
            communication information or electronic device information  
            without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic  
            reader records, or subpoena issued pursuant to specified  
            conditions, except for emergency situations.  CalECPA also  
            generally specifies the conditions under which a government  
            entity may access electronic device information by means of  
            physical interaction or electronic communication with the  
            device, such as pursuant to a search warrant, wiretap order,  
            or consent of the owner of the device.  (Penal Code (PC)  
            Section 1546-1546.4)


          3)Prohibits a government entity from compelling the production  
            of or access to electronic communication information or  
            electronic device information without a search warrant,  








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  6





            wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or  
            subpoena issued pursuant to specified conditions, except for  
            emergency situations.  (PC Section 1546.1)


          4)Specifies the conditions under which a government entity may  
            access electronic device information by means of physical  
            interaction or electronic communication with the device, such  
            as pursuant to a search warrant, wiretap order, or consent of  
            the owner of the device. (PC Section 1546.1)


          5)Authorizes a service provider to voluntarily disclose  
            electronic communication information or subscriber  
            information, and requires a government entity to destroy that  
            information within 90 days unless one or more specified  
            circumstances apply, including, among others, the entity has  
            or obtains the specific consent of the sender or recipient of  
            the electronic communications about which information was  
            disclosed.  (PC Section 1546.2)


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, there is a negligible state fiscal impact.


          COMMENTS:  This bill is intended as a follow-up measure to last  
          year's SB 178 (Leno), Chapter 651, Statutes of 2015, the state's  
          CalECPA which revises the laws controlling how government  
          entities may access electronic communications information and  
          devices.  This bill would enact minor changes, additions and  
          clarifications to CalECPA in order to address a variety of  
          unintended consequences and outstanding stakeholder concerns.   




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Hank Dempsey / P. & C.P. / (916) 319-2200  FN:  








                                                                    SB 1121


                                                                    Page  7





          0004289