BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1130| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 1130 Author: Wieckowski (D), et al. Introduced:2/17/16 Vote: 21 SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 5-2, 3/29/16 AYES: Jackson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning, Wieckowski NOES: Moorlach, Anderson SUBJECT: False advertising: substantiation of claims: county counsel SOURCE: Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors DIGEST: This bill adds county counsels to the list of public prosecutors authorized to require persons who make advertising claims that purport to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence, that compare a product's effectiveness or safety to that of other brands or products, or that purport to be based on any fact, to substantiate their claims. This bill extends to county counsels the authority to seek immediate termination or modification of unsubstantiated advertising claims, or to disseminate information concerning the veracity of such claims. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)States that it is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association, or any employee thereof with intent directly SB 1130 Page 2 or indirectly to dispose of real or personal property or to perform services, professional or otherwise, or to induce the public to enter into any obligation relating thereto, to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated before the public in this state, or to make or disseminate or cause to be made or disseminated from this state before the public in any state, in any newspaper or other publication, or any advertising device, or by public outcry or proclamation, or in any other manner or means whatever, any statement, concerning that real or personal property or those services, professional or otherwise, or concerning any circumstance or matter of fact connected with the proposed performance or disposition thereof, which is untrue or misleading, as specified. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17500.) 2)Specifies that a violation of this provision is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by both that imprisonment and fine. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17500, 17534.) Existing law further states that any person who violates this provision shall be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each violation, which shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General or by any district attorney, county counsel, or city attorney in any court of competent jurisdiction. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17536.) 3)Specifies that any person, corporation, or organization, as specified, which violates or proposes to violate the False Advertising Law may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, and that a court may make such orders or judgments as may be necessary to prevent the use or employment of practices which violate False Advertising Law, or which may be necessary to restore to any person in interest any money or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired by means of any practice in the False Advertising Law declared to be unlawful, as specified. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17535.) 4)Specifies that actions for injunction under the False Advertising Law may be prosecuted by the Attorney General or any district attorney, county counsel, city attorney, or city SB 1130 Page 3 prosecutor in this state in the name of the people of the State of California upon their own complaint or upon the complaint of any board, officer, person, corporation or association or by any person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property as a result of a violation of this law. Existing law specifies that any person may pursue representative claims or relief on behalf of others only if the claimant meets the standing requirements of this section, as specified, but that these limitations do not apply to claims brought by the Attorney General, or any district attorney, county counsel, city attorney, or city prosecutor in this state. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17535.) 5)States that it shall be unlawful for any person doing business in California and advertising to consumers in California to make any false or misleading advertising claim, including claims that: (a) purport to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence; (b) compare the product's effectiveness or safety to that of other brands or products; or (c) purport to be based on any fact. Existing law specifies that the plaintiff shall have the burden of proof in establishing any violation of this section. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17508 (a), (f).) 6)States that upon written request of the Director of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, any city attorney, or any district attorney, any person doing business in California and in whose behalf advertising claims are made to consumers in California, including claims that: (a) purport to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence; (b) compare the product's effectiveness or safety to that of other brands or products; or (c) purport to be based on any fact, shall provide to the department or official making the request evidence of the facts on which the advertising claims are based. Existing law specifies that the request shall be made within one year of the last day on which the advertising claims were made. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17508 (b).) 7)Requires any city attorney or district attorney who makes a request pursuant to this subdivision to give prior notice of the request to the Attorney General. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17508 (b).) SB 1130 Page 4 8)Authorizes the Director of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, any city attorney, or any district attorney to, upon failure of an advertiser to respond by adequately substantiating the claim within a reasonable time, or if the Director of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, a city attorney, or a district attorney has reason to believe that the advertising claim is false or misleading, do either or both of the following: seek an immediate termination or modification of the claim by the person, as specified; and disseminate information, taking due care to protect legitimate trade secrets, concerning the veracity of the claim or why the claim is misleading to the consumers of this state. (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17508 (c).) This bill: 1)Provides that, in addition to other specified public prosecutors, upon written request of any county counsel, any person doing business in California and on whose behalf advertising claims are made to consumers in California, including claims that: (a) purport to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence; (b) compare the product's effectiveness or safety to that of other brands or products; or (c) purport to be based on any fact, shall provide evidence of the facts on which the advertising claims are based, as specified. This bill states that any county counsel who makes a request pursuant to this section shall give prior notice of the request to the Attorney General. 2)Provides that, in addition to other specified public prosecutors, any county counsel may, upon failure of an advertiser to adequately substantiate an advertising claim within a reasonable time, or if the county counsel has reason to believe that the advertising claim is false or misleading, do either or both of the following: seek an immediate termination or modification of the SB 1130 Page 5 claim by the person, as specified; and disseminate information, taking due care to protect legitimate trade secrets, concerning the veracity of the claim or why the claim is misleading to the consumers of this state. Background California's False Advertising Law makes it "unlawful for any person, ? corporation ?, or any employee thereof with intent directly or indirectly to dispose of real or personal property or to perform services ? or to induce the public to enter into any obligation relating thereto, to make or disseminate ? before the public in this state, ? in any newspaper or other publication ? or in any other manner or means whatever ? any statement, concerning that real or personal property or those services ? which is untrue or misleading, and which is known, or which by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading ? ." (Kasky v. Nike, Inc. (2002) 27 Cal.4th 939, 950.) A violation of this provision is a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment of up to six months and a fine not to exceed $2,500, and an action alleging a violation of the law may be brought either by a public prosecutor or by "any person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property as a result of a violation." (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17535.) The California Supreme Court has interpreted the False Advertising Law to "embrace not only advertising which is false, but also advertising which although true, is either actually misleading or which has a capacity, likelihood or tendency to deceive or confuse the public." (Leoni v. State Bar (1985) 39 Cal.3d 609, 626.) Prior to bringing a civil action in court, the False Advertising Law authorizes the Director of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, district attorneys, and city attorneys to require advertisers to substantiate their claims upon written request. If an advertiser fails to substantiate a claim or fails to respond to a request to do so by one of these public SB 1130 Page 6 prosecutors, the False Advertising Law authorizes these public prosecutors to both seek immediate termination or modification of the unsubstantiated claim and disseminate information to the public concerning the truth of the claims made by the advertiser. This bill additionally authorizes county counsels to require advertisers, upon written request, to substantiate claims, as well as to seek the termination or modification of unsubstantiated claims, or to disseminate information to the public about the veracity of such claims. Comments The author writes: The False Advertising law provides an administrative procedure through which the Director of Consumer Affairs, Attorney General, any city attorney, and any district attorney may require advertisers to substantiate advertising claims that are based on facts or evidence or that compare a product's effectiveness or safety to that of other products. This provision enables government entities to obtain evidence and evaluate advertising claims before initiating litigation. In addition, if a person fails to adequately substantiate an advertising claim, the law permits the Director of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, any city attorney, or any district attorney to seek an immediate termination or modification of the advertising claim and/or to disseminate information about the misleading nature of the advertising to California consumers. County counsels currently have the same authority to prosecute false or misleading advertising claims as the Attorney General, any city attorney, and any district attorney, yet they do not have the same authority to obtain information from the advertiser prior to initiating litigation. SB 1130 corrects this oversight by adding county counsels to the list of entities authorized to demand information from an SB 1130 Page 7 advertiser in response to claims of false or misleading advertising. SB 1130 will give county counsels the opportunity to properly evaluate claims and seek redress for false and misleading advertising before initiating litigation. As such, SB 1130 will improve county counsels' ability to prevent and obtain relief from false and misleading marketing of products or services, including those that affect public health and safety. SB 1130 will therefore reduce the need for services from county departments to address the public health and safety consequences of misleading advertising. SB 1130 will also improve county counsels' ability to resolve claims of false and misleading advertising without initiating costly and potentially unnecessary litigation. Related/Prior Legislation AB 1543 (Lempert, Chapter 947, Statutes of 1989) expanded the types of advertising for which specified public prosecutors could request in writing that an advertising claim be substantiated to include claims purported to be based on any fact, and clarified that a plaintiff shall have the burden of proof to establish that a claim was false or misleading. AB 2789 (Knox, Chapter 1002, Statutes of 1976) removed the requirement that a district attorney first seek the approval of the Attorney General before requesting in writing that an advertiser substantiate a claim, and required district attorneys and city attorneys to provide the Attorney General with prior notice before requesting in writing that an advertiser substantiate a claim. SB 1163 (Dymally, Chapter 23, Statutes of 1974) authorized any city attorney, in addition to other public prosecutors, to request evidence of facts upon which advertising claims are based, and to seek immediate termination or modification of a claim if an advertiser fails to respond or if there is reason to believe a claim is false. SB 1130 Page 8 AB 1538 (Meade, Chapter 1417, Statutes of 1972) required, among other things, that upon written request of the Department of Consumer Affairs, the Attorney General, or a district attorney acting with the approval of the Attorney General, any person who makes advertising claims purported to be based on factual, objective, or clinical evidence, or who compares a product's effectiveness or safety with other products, to produce evidence upon which these claims are based. This bill also authorized, upon failure of an advertiser to substantiate such claims, these public prosecutors to seek immediate termination or modification of the claim, or to disseminate information concerning the veracity of the claim to consumers. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified3/29/16) Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors (source) California State Association of Counties Urban Counties of California OPPOSITION: (Verified3/29/16) Civil Justice Association of California ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the California State Association of Counties, under the False Advertising Law, county counsels have the same authority as the Attorney General, any district attorney, and any city attorney to bring a false advertising action on behalf of California's consumers. Current law does not provide county counsels with the authority to ask advertisers to substantiate their advertising claims before filing a lawsuit as it does public attorneys. As a result, SB 1130 Page 9 county counsels are not as well positioned as other public attorneys to evaluate, litigate and seek indemnity for false and misleading advertising. Without this authority, county counsels are more likely to file unnecessary lawsuits because the information needed to fully evaluate the false advertising claim is lacking. SB 1130 therefore facilitates the correction of false advertising claims and assists in eliminating unnecessary lawsuits. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the Civil Justice Association of California, this bill is unnecessary and is intended to facilitate additional litigation. Business and Professions Code Section 17508(b) already permits the state Director of Consumer Affairs and Attorney General, and every city attorney, and every district attorney to demand information substantiating advertising claims. There is no indication that an inadequate number of substantiation demands are being made, or that a county counsel suspecting false advertising could not get support from one of the entities on the list. County counsels are already included in Business and Professions Code Section 17535 as among the entities that can seek injunctive relief, including restitution, for false advertising. Prepared by:Tobias Halvarson / JUD. / (916) 651-4113 3/31/16 15:45:59 **** END ****