BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          SB 1131 (Galgiani) - Department of Motor Vehicles:  records:   
          confidentiality
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: March 28, 2016         |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 7 - 0      |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: April 25, 2016    |Consultant: Jolie Onodera       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.




          Bill  
          Summary:  SB 1131 would add code enforcement officers, parking  
          control officers, non-sworn investigators with the Department of  
          Insurance (DOI), and the spouses and children of these persons  
          to the list of persons who may request an additional level of  
          confidentiality from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). 


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
           To the extent up to 6,500 code enforcement officers, DOI  
            investigators, parking control officers, and their family  
            members could apply in the first year and/or annually  
            thereafter, accounting for changes to vehicle ownership, the  
            DMV would incur additional staffing costs to process these  
            applications as the system is administered manually, including  
            a significant portion requiring follow-up inquiries.  







          SB 1131 (Galgiani)                                     Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
            First-year costs are estimated at about $350,000 and ongoing  
            costs of $85,000 (Special Fund*). 
           Potential reduction in state and local tolls, parking fees,  
            and fines to the extent that current law makes it difficult  
            for local parking and toll agencies to collect tolls and fines  
            from additional persons protected by the enhanced  
            confidentiality statutes. 

          *Motor Vehicle Account


          Background:  Under existing law the residential address of certain public  
          employees and their families are confidential. (Vehicle Code  
          (VC) §§ 1808.4 and 1808.6.) 
          Existing law states that all residence addresses in any record  
          of the DMV are confidential and shall not be disclosed to any  
          person, except a court, law enforcement agency, or other  
          governmental agency, or as otherwise authorized. (VC § 1808.21.)


          Existing law provides that the release of such confidential  
          information is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to  
          $5,000 and/or by up to one year in county jail. (VC § 1808.45.)   





          According to the Senate Committee on Public Safety analysis of  
 
          this measure:

             Vehicle Code section 1808.4 was added by statute in 1977  
             to provide confidentiality of home addresses to specified  
             public employees and their families. In 1989, Vehicle Code  
             section 1808.21 was added to make all residence addresses  
             contained within the DMV files confidential. Vehicle Code  
             section 1808.21(a) states the following: 

             The residence address in any record of the department is  
             confidential and cannot 
             be disclosed to any person except a court, law enforcement  
             agency, or other governmental agency, or as authorized in  
             Sections 1808.22 or 1808.23. 








          SB 1131 (Galgiani)                                     Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          

             This section was further amended in 1994 to allow  
             individuals under specific circumstances to request that  
             their entire records be suppressed. Any individual who is  
             the subject of stalking or who is experiencing a threat of  
             death or great bodily injury to his or her person may  
             request their entire record to be suppressed under this  
             section. 
             Upon suppression of a record, each request for information  
             about that record has to be authorized by the subject of  
             the record or verified as legitimate by other  
             investigative means by the DMV before the information is  
             released. 

             A record is suppressed for a one-year period. At the end  
             of the one year period, the suppression is continued for a  
             period determined by the department and if the person  
             submits verification acceptable to the department that he  
             or she continues to have reasonable cause to believe that  
             he or she is the subject of stalking or that there exists  
             a threat of death or great bodily injury to his or her  
             person. 

             DMV has long maintained that all residence addresses are  
             suppressed and only persons authorized by statute can  
             access this information.


          Proposed Law:  
           This bill would add the following persons to those who may  
          request an additional level of confidentiality from the DMV:
                 A code enforcement officer, as specified.
                 A parking control officer employed by a city, county, or  
               city and county, university, college, public hospital,  
               public airport, special district, or other public agency to  
               monitor and enforce state laws and ordinances related to  
               parking.
                 An investigator employed by the Department of Insurance.
                 The spouse or child of a person listed above, regardless  
               of the spouse's or child's place of residence.


          Prior  
          Legislation:  SB 672 (Galgiani) 2015 was identical to this  








          SB 1131 (Galgiani)                                     Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          
          measure. This bill was held on the Suspense File of this  
          Committee.
          AB 2687 (Bocanegra) Chapter 273/2014 allows Licensing Program  
          Analysts from the Department of Social Services to enroll in the  
          DMV Confidential Records Program.


          SB 767 (Lieu) 2014 would have added code enforcement officers to  
          those eligible to enroll in the DMV Confidential Records  
          Program. This bill failed passage in the Assembly Committee on  
          Transportation. 


          Over the past 10 years, a number of bills proposing to expand  
          the statutory confidentiality list, including for code  
          enforcement officers, have either failed in committee or have  
          been vetoed. 


                                      -- END --