BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1143| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 1143 Author: Leno (D), et al. Amended: 8/15/16 Vote: 21 SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 4/19/16 AYES: Hancock, Anderson, Glazer, Leno, Liu, Monning, Stone SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 6-1, 5/27/16 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza NOES: Nielsen SENATE FLOOR: 36-0, 6/2/16 AYES: Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Glazer, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Nguyen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Stone, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk NO VOTE RECORDED: Galgiani, Morrell, Nielsen, Runner ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 8/18/16 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Juveniles: room confinement SOURCE: Chief Probation Officers of California Ella Baker Center for Human Rights DIGEST: This bill establishes statutory guidelines and restrictions, to become operative on January 1, 2018, for confining a minor or ward in a juvenile facility in a locked sleeping room or cell with minimal or no contact with persons other than correctional facility staff and attorneys, as specified. SB 1143 Page 2 Assembly Amendments refine the bill to provide for extraordinary, emergency circumstances, as specified, and also to provide for instances where a communicable disease or extended medical care is involved, as specified. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Provides generally that the purpose of the juvenile court law "is to provide for the protection and safety of the public and each minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court and to preserve and strengthen the minor's family ties whenever possible, removing the minor from the custody of his or her parents only when necessary for his or her welfare or for the safety and protection of the public. If removal of a minor is determined by the juvenile court to be necessary, reunification of the minor with his or her family shall be a primary objective. If the minor is removed from his or her own family, it is the purpose of this chapter to secure for the minor custody, care, and discipline as nearly as possible equivalent to that which should have been given by his or her parents . . . ` . . . Minors under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court who are in need of protective services shall receive care, treatment, and guidance consistent with their best interest and the best interest of the public. Minors under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a consequence of delinquent conduct shall, in conformity with the interests of public safety and protection, receive care, treatment, and guidance that is consistent with their best interest, that holds them accountable for their behavior, and that is appropriate for their circumstances . . ." (Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 202.) SB 1143 Page 3 2)Provides that minors under the age of 18 years may be adjudged to be a ward of the court for violating "any law of this state or of the United States or any ordinance of any city or county of this state defining crime," as specified. (WIC § 602.) 3)Generally provides that when a minor is adjudged a ward of the court on the ground that he or she is delinquent, the court may make any and all reasonable orders for the care, supervision, custody, conduct, maintenance, and support of the minor, including medical treatment, subject to further order of the court, as specified. (WIC § 727(a).) 4)Authorizes the court to place a ward of the court in a juvenile hall, ranch, camp, forestry camp, secure juvenile home, or the Division of Juvenile Facilities, as specified. (WIC§ 726.) 5)Requires the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) to "adopt minimum standards for the operation and maintenance of juvenile halls for the confinement of minors." (WIC § 210.) 6)Requires the BSCC to "adopt and prescribe the minimum standards of construction, operation, programs of education and training, and qualifications of personnel for juvenile ranches, camps, or forestry camps . . ." (WIC § 885.) This bill: 1)Requires, starting January 1, 2018, the placement of a minor or ward in room confinement to be accomplished in accordance with the following guidelines: a) Room confinement shall not be used before other less restrictive options have been attempted and exhausted, unless attempting those options poses a threat to the safety or security of any minor, ward, or staff. SB 1143 Page 4 b) Room confinement shall not be used for the purposes of punishment, coercion, convenience, or retaliation by staff. c) Room confinement shall not be used to the extent that it compromises the mental and physical health of the minor or ward. 2)Provides that a minor or ward may be held up to four hours in room confinement. After the minor or ward has been held in room confinement for a period of four hours, staff shall do one or more of the following: a) Return the minor or ward to general population; b) Consult with mental health or medical staff; or, c) Develop an individualized plan that includes the goals and objectives to be met in order to reintegrate the minor or ward to general population. 3)States that if room confinement must be extended beyond four hours, staff shall do the following: a) Document the reason for room confinement and the basis for the extension, the date and time the minor or ward was first placed in room confinement, and when he or she is eventually released from room confinement; b) Develop an individualized plan that includes the goals and objectives to be met in order to reintegrate the minor or ward to general population; and, c) Obtain documented authorization by the facility superintendent or his or her designee every four hours thereafter. SB 1143 Page 5 4)Clarifies that the provisions in this bill are not intended to limit the use of single-person rooms or cells for the housing of minors or wards in juvenile facilities and does not apply to normal sleeping hours. 5)States that the provisions in this bill do not apply to minors or wards in court holding facilities or adult facilities. 6)Provides that nothing in this bill shall be construed to conflict with any law providing greater or additional protections to minors or wards. 7)Defines "room confinement" to mean "the placement of a minor or ward in a locked sleeping room or cell with minimal or no contact with persons other than correctional facility staff and attorneys. Room confinement does not include confinement of a minor or ward in a single-person room or cell for brief periods of locked room confinement necessary for required institutional operations." 8)Defines "juvenile facility" to include the following: a) A juvenile hall; b) A juvenile camp or ranch; c) A facility of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities; d) A regional youth educational facility; e) A youth correctional center; f) A juvenile regional facility; and, g) Any other local or state facility used for the confinement of minors or wards. SB 1143 Page 6 9)States that the provisions in this bill do not apply to the following situations: a) During an extraordinary, emergency circumstance that requires a significant departure from normal institutions, as provided; or, b) When a minor or ward is placed in a locked cell or sleep room for medical purposes, as provided. Background According to the author, "This bill seeks to limit the use of room confinement in California's juvenile facilities by providing a standard definition and specific guidelines around its use. The bill requires juvenile facilities to attempt and exhaust less restrictive options before using room confinement. Room confinement cannot be used to the extent it compromises the mental or physical health of the youth and it cannot be used for the purposes of punishment, retaliation, coercion or convenience by staff. Room confinement lasting beyond four hours requires a sign off by the facility superintendent and every four hours thereafter, documentation, and an individualized plan to reintegrate the youth back into general population. "The use of long-term isolation is clearly documented in both state and local juvenile facilities. Despite a longstanding consent decree in effect since 2004, an internal CDCR [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation] audit found continuing abuses in the Division of Juvenile Facilities as late as 2011, including youth locked up in their cells for more than 23 hours a day. Additionally, in a recent 2014 report released by Barry Krisberg of the Warren Institute at UC [University of California] Berkeley, youth in the most restrictive current program at DJJ [Department of Juvenile Justice] known as the 'Behavior Treatment Program,' were required to receive only 3 hours outside of their cell, and were typically there for approximately 60 days. Despite some SB 1143 Page 7 improvements in state conditions since the 2011 audit, the consent decree has since been lifted earlier this year, and it is critical that statutory definitions and parameters on the use of room confinement that is consistent for all juvenile facilities be established going forward. At the local level, there are even fewer guidelines and limitations. A federal class-action lawsuit filed against Contra Costa's juvenile hall for youth with disabilities who were placed in long term isolation and denied education as a punishment was recently settled by the county, and the conditions of the settlement are nearly identical to SB 1143, clearly demonstrating that the parameters established in the bill can be implemented at the county level. There simply must be a statewide standard defining room confinement, and limiting its duration so that youth are in the classroom and other rehabilitative programming. This bill will lead to better rehabilitative outcomes for youth, a safer correctional environment for staff and youth, and the avoidance of costly lawsuits." FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Unknown, but potentially significant, reimbursable mandated costs for County Youth Facilities staff training, and for staff to consult with mental health or medical staff and/or develop reintegration plans when appropriate. If the 20 largest counties submit a successful mandate claim for over $20,000, the cost to the state would exceed $400,000. 2)Annual ongoing-cost to the Department of Corrections' Division of Juvenile Justice would exceed $650,000 (General Fund) to provide one conflict management staff per facility, and to provide the additional required documentation. 3)Proponents indicate that current practice has resulted in SB 1143 Page 8 significant court settlements, and therefore, this bill will result in significant savings. It is possible that statewide-specific standards and protocols could reduce litigation costs. Furthermore, the one year delay in implementation would allow for a "phase-in" implementation and reduce training costs. SUPPORT: (Verified8/18/16) Chief Probation Officers of California (co-source) Ella Baker Center for Human Rights (co-source) Alliance for Boys and Men of Color American Civil Liberties Union of California American Friends Service Committee California Attorneys for Criminal Justice California Catholic Conference California Coalition for Youth California Prison Focus Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Children Now Children's Defense Fund - California Children's Law and Policy Community Works Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice Courage Campaign Equality California First Congregational Church of Palo Alto GSA Network of California Human Rights Watch Immigrant Legal Resource Center Jewish Community High School Justice Not Jails Justice Now Law Foundation of Silicon Valley Legal Services for Prisoners with Children National Center for Youth Law National Juvenile Justice Network National Religious Campaign Against Torture Occidental Hillel Pacific Juvenile Defender Center SB 1143 Page 9 Peace United Church of Christ, Santa Cruz Resource Development Associates Temple Beth El Jewish Community Center T'ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights Santa Cruz-Statewide Coordinated Actions To End Solitary Confinement W. Haywood Burns Institute Women's Foundation of California Youth Law Center Several individuals OPPOSITION: (Verified8/18/16) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 8/18/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Wood, Rendon NO VOTE RECORDED: Roger Hernández, Kim, Williams Prepared by:Alison Anderson / PUB. S. / 8/19/16 19:37:25 **** END **** SB 1143 Page 10