BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1171|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1171
Author: Committee on Judiciary
Amended: 5/16/16
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 3/29/16
AYES: Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning,
Wieckowski
SENATE FLOOR: 38-0, 4/7/16 (Consent)
AYES: Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block,
Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,
Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Lara, Leno,
Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach,
Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Stone, Vidak,
Wieckowski, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Jackson, Runner
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/16/16 (Consent) - See last page for
vote
SUBJECT: Maintenance of the codes
SOURCE: Office of Legislative Counsel
DIGEST: This bill makes numerous technical changes in the
California codes that have been recommended by the Office of
Legislative Counsel. The proposed changes do not make any
substantive change in the law.
Assembly Amendments add additional technical nonsubstantive
changes to the California codes.
SB 1171
Page 2
ANALYSIS:
This bill makes numerous technical changes in the California
code that have been recommended by the Office of Legislative
Counsel.
Background
Each year, the Office of Legislative Counsel identifies
grammatical errors and other errors of a technical nature that
have been inadvertently enacted into statutory law. The annual
"Maintenance of the Codes" bill is the vehicle for implementing
these wholesale corrections. In order to be included in the
bill, the change must be technical only and may not affect or
enact substantive law. Consequently, any provision that is
identified as making a substantive change will be deleted by the
Office of Legislative Counsel.
Proposed Section 330 on page 631 of this bill includes an
"all-purpose" yielding clause that avoids any double jointing
problems that might otherwise occur.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:NoLocal: No
SUPPORT: (Verified6/17/16)
Office of Legislative Counsel (source)
OPPOSITION: (Verified6/17/16)
None received
SB 1171
Page 3
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/16/16
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,
Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon,
Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper,
Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines,
Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson,
Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Holden,
Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,
Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,
Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,
Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,
Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,
Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Brough, Roger Hernández
Prepared by:Margie Estrada / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
6/17/16 15:04:00
**** END ****