BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1171| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 1171 Author: Committee on Judiciary Amended: 5/16/16 Vote: 21 SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: 7-0, 3/29/16 AYES: Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning, Wieckowski SENATE FLOOR: 38-0, 4/7/16 (Consent) AYES: Allen, Anderson, Bates, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, De León, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall, Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Pan, Pavley, Roth, Stone, Vidak, Wieckowski, Wolk NO VOTE RECORDED: Jackson, Runner ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/16/16 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Maintenance of the codes SOURCE: Office of Legislative Counsel DIGEST: This bill makes numerous technical changes in the California codes that have been recommended by the Office of Legislative Counsel. The proposed changes do not make any substantive change in the law. Assembly Amendments add additional technical nonsubstantive changes to the California codes. SB 1171 Page 2 ANALYSIS: This bill makes numerous technical changes in the California code that have been recommended by the Office of Legislative Counsel. Background Each year, the Office of Legislative Counsel identifies grammatical errors and other errors of a technical nature that have been inadvertently enacted into statutory law. The annual "Maintenance of the Codes" bill is the vehicle for implementing these wholesale corrections. In order to be included in the bill, the change must be technical only and may not affect or enact substantive law. Consequently, any provision that is identified as making a substantive change will be deleted by the Office of Legislative Counsel. Proposed Section 330 on page 631 of this bill includes an "all-purpose" yielding clause that avoids any double jointing problems that might otherwise occur. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified6/17/16) Office of Legislative Counsel (source) OPPOSITION: (Verified6/17/16) None received SB 1171 Page 3 ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 6/16/16 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon NO VOTE RECORDED: Brough, Roger Hernández Prepared by:Margie Estrada / JUD. / (916) 651-4113 6/17/16 15:04:00 **** END ****