BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          
          SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
                             Senator Loni Hancock, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

          Bill No:    SB 1182       Hearing Date:      March 29, 2016   
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Author:    |Galgiani                                             |
          |-----------+-----------------------------------------------------|
          |Version:   |February 18, 2016                                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Urgency:   |No                     |Fiscal:    |Yes              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant:|JM                                                   |
          |           |                                                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                           Subject:  Controlled Substances



          HISTORY

          Source:   Author

          Prior Legislation:SB 333 (Galgiani) - Vetoed, 2015

          Support:  Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs Association; California  
                    College and University Police Chiefs Association;  
                    California Correctional Supervisors Association;  
                    California Narcotic Officers Association; California  
                    Police Chiefs Association; Los Angeles County  
                    Professional Peace Officer Association; Crime Victims  
                    United of California; Los Angeles Police Protective  
                    League; Riverside Sheriffs Association; California  
                    District Attorneys Association; Peace Officers  
                    Research Association of California; California State  
                    Sheriffs' Association; Fraternal Order of Police;  
                    Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs; Long  
                    Beach Police Officers Association; California  
                    Statewide Law Enforcement Association; Sacramento  
                    County Deputy Sheriffs' Association; 

          Opposition:California Attorneys for Criminal Justice; Legal  
                    Services for Prisoners with Children








          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageB  
          of?
          

           


          PURPOSE

          The purpose of this bill is to provide that possession of gamma  
          hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), flunitrazepam (Rohypnol), or ketamine  
          with the intent to commit a sex crime, as defined, is a felony,  
          punishable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1170 (h) for sixteen  
          months, two years or three years.

          Existing law provides that the possession of specified  
          controlled substances including ketamine, flunitrazepam, and  
          GHB, unless upon the prescription of a physician, dentist,  
          podiatrist, or veterinarian licensed to practice in this state,  
          is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in a county jail,  
          except for a person who has one or more prior convictions for a  
          specified violent felony or has been convicted of a prior  
          offense requiring the person to register as a sex offender, then  
          the penalty shall be a felony. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11350,  
          subd. (a) and 11377, subd. (a).)

          Existing law classifies controlled substances in five schedules  
          according to their danger and potential for abuse.  Schedule I  
          controlled substances have the greatest restrictions and  
          penalties, including prohibiting the prescribing of a Schedule I  
          controlled substance.  (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11054 to 11058.)


          Existing law states, except as provided, that every person who  
          possesses for sale or purchases for purposes of sale any of the  
          specified controlled substances, including cocaine and heroin,  
          shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for two,  
          three, or four years.  (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.)

          Existing law provides that every person that transports, imports  
          into the state, sells, furnishes, administers, or gives away, or  
          offers to transport, import into the state, sell, furnish, or  
          give away, or attempts to import into this state or transport  
          cocaine, cocaine base, or heroin, or other specified controlled  
          substances listed in the controlled substance schedule, without  
          a written prescription from a licensed physician, dentist,  
          podiatrist, or veterinarian shall be punished by imprisonment  









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageC  
          of?
          
          for three, four, or five years. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352,  
          subd. (a).)

          Existing law states that the possession for sale of  
          methamphetamine, and other specified controlled substances is  
          punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for 16 months, two  
          or three years. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378.)

          Existing law provides that every person that transports, imports  
          into the state, sells, furnishes, administers, or gives away, or  
          offers to transport, import into the state, sell, furnish, or  
          give away, or attempts to import into this state or transport  
          methamphetamine, or other specified  controlled substances   
          listed in the controlled substance schedule, without a written  
          prescription from a licensed physician, dentist, podiatrist, or  
          veterinarian shall be punished by imprisonment for two, three,  
          or four years.  (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a).)

          Existing law states that every person guilty of administering to  
          another any chloroform, ether, laudanum, or any controlled  
          substance, anesthetic, or intoxicating agent, with intent  
          thereby to enable or assist himself or herself or any other  
          person to commit a felony, is guilty of a felony punishable by  
          imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, or two or three  
          years.  (Pen. Code, § 222.)

          Existing law states that rape is an act of sexual intercourse  
          accomplished where a person is prevented from resisting by any  
          intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled  
          substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should  
          have been known, by the accused. (Pen. Code, §§ 261, subd.  
          (a)(3); 262, subd. (a)(2).)

          Existing law specifies felony penalties for any person who  
          commits an act of sodomy, oral copulation or sexual penetration  
          where the victim is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating  
          or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this  
          condition was known, or reasonably should have been known, by  
          the accused. (Pen. Code, §§ 286, subd. (i); 288a, subd. (i);  
          289, subd. (e).)

          This bill provides that a person who possesses gamma  
          hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), ketamine or flunitrazepam, also known  
          by the trade name Rohypnol, with the intent to commit sexual  









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageD  
          of?
          
          assault, as defined, is guilty of a felony, punishable by  
          imprisonment pursuant to Penal Code Section 1170 (h) for sixteen  
          months, two years or three years. 

          This bill defines "sexual assault" for the purposes of this bill  
          to include, but not be limited to, violations of specified  
          provisions related to sexual assault committed against a victim  
          who is prevented from resisting by an intoxicating or anesthetic  
          substance, or any controlled substance. 

          This bill states the finding of the Legislature that in order to  
          deter the possession of ketamine, GHB, and Rohypnol by sexual  
          predators and to take steps to prevent the use of these drugs to  
          incapacitate victims for purposes of sexual exploitation, it is  
          necessary and appropriate that an individual who possesses one  
          of these substances for predatory purposes be subject to felony  
          penalties.
          
                    RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION
                                          
          For the past several years this Committee has scrutinized  
          legislation referred to its jurisdiction for any potential  
          impact on prison overcrowding.  Mindful of the United States  
          Supreme Court ruling and federal court orders relating to the  
          state's ability to provide a constitutional level of health care  
          to its inmate population and the related issue of prison  
          overcrowding, this Committee has applied its "ROCA" policy as a  
          content-neutral, provisional measure necessary to ensure that  
          the Legislature does not erode progress in reducing prison  
          overcrowding.   

          On February 10, 2014, the federal court ordered California to  
          reduce its in-state adult institution population to 137.5% of  
          design capacity by February 28, 2016, as follows:   

                 143% of design bed capacity by June 30, 2014;
                 141.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2015; and,
                 137.5% of design bed capacity by February 28, 2016. 

          In December of 2015 the administration reported that as "of  
          December 9, 2015, 112,510 inmates were housed in the State's 34  
          adult institutions, which amounts to 136.0% of design bed  
          capacity, and 5,264 inmates were housed in out-of-state  
          facilities.  The current population is 1,212 inmates below the  









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageE  
          of?
          
          final court-ordered population benchmark of 137.5% of design bed  
          capacity, and has been under that benchmark since February  
          2015."  (Defendants' December 2015 Status Report in Response to  
          February 10, 2014 Order, 2:90-cv-00520 KJM DAD PC, 3-Judge  
          Court, Coleman v. Brown, Plata v. Brown (fn. omitted).)  One  
          year ago, 115,826 inmates were housed in the State's 34 adult  
          institutions, which amounted to 140.0% of design bed capacity,  
          and 8,864 inmates were housed in out-of-state facilities.   
          (Defendants' December 2014 Status Report in Response to February  
          10, 2014 Order, 2:90-cv-00520 KJM DAD PC, 3-Judge Court, Coleman  
          v. Brown, Plata v. Brown (fn. omitted).)  
           
          While significant gains have been made in reducing the prison  
          population, the state must stabilize these advances and  
          demonstrate to the federal court that California has in place  
          the "durable solution" to prison overcrowding "consistently  
          demanded" by the court.  (Opinion Re: Order Granting in Part and  
          Denying in Part Defendants' Request For Extension of December  
          31, 2013 Deadline, NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD (PC), 3-Judge Court,  
          Coleman v. Brown, Plata v. Brown (2-10-14).  The Committee's  
          consideration of bills that may impact the prison population  
          therefore will be informed by the following questions:

              Whether a proposal erodes a measure which has contributed  
               to reducing the prison population;
              Whether a proposal addresses a major area of public safety  
               or criminal activity for which there is no other  
               reasonable, appropriate remedy;
              Whether a proposal addresses a crime which is directly  
               dangerous to the physical safety of others for which there  
               is no other reasonably appropriate sanction; 
              Whether a proposal corrects a constitutional problem or  
               legislative drafting error; and
              Whether a proposal proposes penalties which are  
               proportionate, and cannot be achieved through any other  
               reasonably appropriate remedy.


          COMMENTS

          1.Need for This Bill

          According to the author:










          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageF  
          of?
          
               In November 2014, California voters approved  
               Proposition 47 which reclassified many crimes from  
               felonies to misdemeanors. One of these  
               reclassifications involved the possession of the drugs  
               Rohypnol, GHB and ketamine-commonly known as "date  
               rape" drugs.   Prior to Proposition 47, possession of  
               a date rape drug was punishable as a "wobbler" in  
               which the prosecutor or judge can determine whether a  
               felony or misdemeanor is appropriate based on the  
               facts of the case.  Prop. 47 removed the ability to  
               charge an individual with a felony for possession. 

               A fundamental difference exists between the possession  
               of recreational drugs meant to be consumed by that  
               individual and the possession of 'date rape' drugs  
               when intended to be used on another individual.  These  
               drugs will render a sexual assault victim completely  
               incapacitated.  They also result in a victim having  
               little to no memory of the assault which took place.   
               This allows a rapist to escape prosecution because a  
               victim can't remember the details of the crime when  
               questioned in court.  Concerns have been expressed in  
               the law enforcement community that the new law  
               relating to the possession of date rape drugs can  
               potentially weaken sexual assault statutes and harm  
               public safety. 

               Senate Bill 1182 would give prosecutors the ability to  
               bring felony charges against individuals caught in  
               possession of date rape drugs with the intent to  
               commit a sexual assault.  Given the difficult nature  
               of prosecuting sexual assault crimes, the Legislature  
               should embrace this opportunity to provide serious  
               consequences for criminals looking to use date rape  
               drugs to facilitate a heinous crime.

          2.Difference Between Attempted Sexual Assault and Possession of  
            a Drug with Intent to Commit a Sex Crime


          Governor Brown vetoed the identical predecessor to this bill -  
          SB 333 (Galgiani) - in 2015.  In relevant part, the Governor's  
          veto message on this and numerous other bills stated:










          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageG  
          of?
          

               Each of these bills creates a new crime - usually by  
               finding a novel way to characterize and criminalize  
               conduct that is already proscribed.  This  
               multiplication and particularization of criminal  
               behavior creates increasing complexity without  
               commensurate benefit. 

          Members may wish to consider whether possession of a drug  
          with intent to commit a sex crime is equivalent to attempt  
          to commit a sex crime, which already is a crime.  In many  
          cases, the proof of an attempted sex crime would overlap  
          with proof of possession of a drug with intent to commit a  
          sex crime.  An attempt to commit a crime has the following  
          two elements:  The defendant intended to commit a crime and  
          he or she took a direct, yet ultimately ineffectual, step  
          towards commission of the crime.  An attempted crime would  
          have been completed except for some circumstance or  
          occurrence that interrupted or prevented the defendant's  
          commission of the offense.  Preparation to commit a crime  
          is not a direct step towards commission of a crime that  
          establishes an attempt.   (People v. Breverman (1998) 19  
          Cal.4th 142, 154; CALCRIM 406.)  Possession of a drug with  
          the intent to commit a sex crime would appear to constitute  
          preparation, not an attempt, under current law.

          With the crime defined by this bill - possession of a specified  
          drug with the intent to commit a sex crime - the prosecution  
          would not need to prove that the defendant went beyond  
          preparation and took a direct step toward commission of the  
          crime.  The prosecutor would simply need to prove possession,  
          including exercising dominion and control of a drug that is not  
          held on the defendant's person, with the intent to commit a sex  
          offense.  Proof of intent would typically involve the  
          defendant's admission of such intent or prior convictions and  
          arrests for similar conduct.  

          In most cases, there are limits on the use of prior convictions  
          as proof of a current crime.  Specifically, a defendant's prior  
          convictions or bad acts cannot be used to establish his or her  
          propensity to commit the charged offense.  (Evid. Code § 1101,  
          subd. (a).)  Propensity evidence  is essentially improper  
          character evidence.  Jurors who are informed that a defendant  
          has been previously convicted of a crime - especially the same  









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageH  
          of?
          
          crime for which the defendant is being tried - are highly likely  
          to convict the defendant because of his or her propensity to  
          commit the charged offense, not the evidence in the current  
          case.  People v. Thompson (1980) 27 Cal.3d 303, 317-318.)    
          Evidence of prior convictions and other bad acts are, however,  
          admissible to prove knowledge intent, motive, common plan or  
          identity.  (Evid. Code § 1101, subd. (b); People v. Ewoldt  
          (1994) 7 Cal.4th at 380, 393-406.)   

          As to sex crime prosecutions, "all that changed ?with the advent  
          of [Evidence Code] section 1108."  (People v. Britt (2002) 104  
          Cal.App.4th 500, 505.)  Evidence Code  Section 1108, subdivision  
          (a) provides:  "In a criminal action in which the defendant is  
          accused of a sexual offense, evidence of the defendant's  
          commission of another sexual offense or offenses is not made  
          inadmissible by Section 1101, if the evidence is not  
          inadmissible pursuant to Section 352."  Section 352 authorizes a  
          trial judge to bar use of evidence that is more prejudicial than  
          probative.  Evidence is more prejudicial than probative if the  
          unfairness of the evidence outweighs its tendency to prove an  
          issue in the case.  

          Jurors find prior convictions or arrests for a similar offense  
          to the one charged to be very powerful evidence.  The fact that  
          jurors will likely rely on a prior conviction in weighing a  
          defendant's guilt than the evidence about the current offense is  
          precisely why prior conviction evidence is generally  
          inadmissible.  (People v. Thompson, supra, 27 Cal.3d 303,  
          317-318.)

          





          3.Plea Bargain Issues - Obtaining a Plea to Possession of a Drug  
            with Intent to Commit a Sex Crime in Cases where Conviction at  
            Trial of a Violent Sex Crime is Uncertain


          The crime defined by this bill could be the basis for a plea  
          bargain in cases where the prosecutor and the defendant are each  
          not confident of prevailing in the trial of a sex crime such as  









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageI  
          of?
          
          rape or forced oral copulation.  If there are proof problems  
          with a more serious sex offense - for example, the witness  
          cannot remember important things about the incident or she is  
          extremely reluctant to testify - the prosecutor could still  
          obtain a felony conviction for sex crime through a plea, rather  
          than the defendant going free or being convicted of an offense  
          that doesn't reflect his criminal sexual intent.  A defendant  
          could be motivated to plead guilty in order to avoid a long  
          sentence if he were convicted of the more serious offense.   
          Because the consequences for something going wrong are so severe  
          - a long prison term for the defendant and the possibility that  
          a predator walks free for the prosecution - each side tends to  
          be acutely aware of the weaknesses in his or her case.     

          Defendants with prior sex offenses are excluded from misdemeanor  
          possession of drugs charges under Proposition 47.  However, a  
          simple possession conviction would not reflect that the  
          defendant's crime was sexually motivated or that he has a  
          history of sex crimes.  The crime defined by this bill would  
          clearly reflect the defendant's criminal sexual intent.

          4.Use of Ketamine, Flunitrazepam or GHB for Prescription  
            Medications, Self-Medication and Intoxication

          Ketamine is an anesthetic-dissociative drug.  It appears to be  
          the drug of choice in pediatric surgery and pediatric emergency  
          pain management, as it blocks the sensation of pain without full  
          unconsciousness and depressed respiration.<1><2>  Ketamine is  
          very widely used in African and other countries with low  
          per-capita income levels, as it is effective, cheap and safe.   
          Greater restrictions of ketamine manufacturing and distribution  
          have caused great alarm in Africa among physicians and public  
          health experts.<3>

          ---------------------------
          <1> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18645539

          <2>  
          http://emupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ACEP-Ketamine-Gui 
          deline-2011.pdf

          <3>  
          http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/27/raver-drug-ketamine- 
          control-plan-at-un-condemned-as-potential-disaster









          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageJ  
          of?
          
          Ketamine has recently been used as an "off label" drug for the  
          treatment of depressions.  Patients report that they lose their  
          depressive symptoms quickly and the effect lasts for months.<4>   
          Clinical trials have been conducted or are underway for use of  
          ketamine as a formally recognized depression treatment. The  
          results of the trials have been remarkably positive.<5><6>

          Ketamine is used for intoxication or mind-altering experiences.   
          Users seek the dissociative experience that would be considered  
          an unwanted or problematic side effect in medial use.  Users  
          lose awareness of their surroundings and report vivid  
          hallucinations.  Some people found them profound and  
          enjoyable,<7> others found the experience disturbing.   

          GHB is prescribed to narcoleptics to allow them to sleep deeply  
          at night.  It is often used as a so-called "club drug."<8>  It  
          has been described as being similar to alcohol intoxication, but  
          with more euphoric effects, without a hangover the next day.   
          However, users' experiences are quite variable.<9>  GHB is  
          dangerous when mixed with alcohol, as both are central nervous  
          system depressants.  

          Flunitrazepam is a benzodiazepine, the class of  
          sedative-hypnotic drugs that include Xanax, Valium, and many  
          others.  It was developed in 1965.  It has been described as 10  
          times more potent than Valium, but is typically prescribed in  
          doses that are 1/10th of that of a common Valium dose.  It is  
          ---------------------------

          <4>  
          http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/business/special-k-a-hallucinog 
          en-raises-hopes-and-concerns-as-a-treatment-for-depression.html?_ 
          r=0

          <5> http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2014/ketamine.shtml

          <6>http://www.nimh.nih.gov/labs-at-nimh/join-a-study/trials/adult 
          -studies/rapid-antidepressant-effects-of-ketamine.shtml

          <7> https://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=38360

          <8> 'The silent 'G'" Contemporary Drug Problems, 2012

          <9>  
          https://www.erowid.org/experiences/subs/exp_GHB.shtml#General








          SB 1182  (Galgiani )                                      PageK  
          of?
          
          not available legally in the United States, but it is available  
          around the world.  It has been the most widely prescribed drug  
          of its class in Europe.<10>  It has been successfully used to  
          treat alcoholics suffering from delirium tremens during  
          withdrawal.  Flunitrazepam is very widely used by heroin addicts  
          to boost the effects of the drug without risking overdose and to  
          ease withdrawal.<11><12>  A University of Illinois study on the  
                                           extent of drug facilitated sexual assault noted use of the drug  
          by opiate addicts and cocaine users, including rape victims  
          themselves.  (Negruz, et al., Estimate of the Incidence of  
          Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault in the U.S, Univ. of Illinois,  
          Chicago (Nov. 2005).)  


                                          


                                      -- END -





          












          ---------------------------
          <10> http://www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/rohypnol.asp

          <11> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8102333

          <12> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3454351/