BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1189|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1189
Author: Pan (D) and Jackson (D), et al.
Amended: 8/19/16
Vote: 21
SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE: 6-2, 4/20/16
AYES: Hernandez, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Roth, Wolk
NOES: Nguyen, Nielsen
NO VOTE RECORDED: Hall
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 5/27/16
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza
NOES: Bates, Nielsen
SENATE FLOOR: 24-14, 6/2/16
AYES: Allen, Beall, Block, De León, Glazer, Hancock,
Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno, Leyva,
Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Pavley, Roth,
Wieckowski, Wolk
NOES: Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines,
Hall, Huff, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Stone, Vidak
NO VOTE RECORDED: Galgiani, Runner
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 8/23/16 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Postmortem examinations or autopsies: forensic
pathologists
SOURCE: Union of American Physicians and Dentists
DIGEST: This bill requires a forensic autopsy to only be
conducted by a licensed physician. Requires all persons in the
autopsy suite to have current bloodborne pathogen training and
SB 1189
Page 2
personal protective equipment in accordance with existing law
for health and safety purposes. Prohibits, if an individual dies
due to the involvement of law enforcement activity, law
enforcement personnel directly involved with the care and
custody of that individual from being involved with any portion
of the postmortem examination nor allowed inside the autopsy
suite during the performance of the autopsy.
Assembly Amendments (1) permit trained county personnel who are
necessary to the performance of an autopsy, at the direction and
supervision of a coroner, a medical examiner (ME), or a licensed
physician and surgeon, to take body measurements or retrieve
blood, urine, or vitreous samples from the body of a decedent;
(2) permit only individuals who are directly involved in the
investigation of the death of the decedent to be present during
the performance; (3) require the manner of death, for purposes
of this bill, to be determined by the coroner or ME examiner of
a county. Requires the coroner, if a forensic autopsy is
conducted by a licensed physician and surgeon, to consult with
the licensed physician and surgeon in the determination of the
manner of death; (4) permit individuals to be permitted in the
autopsy suite for educational and research purposes at the
discretion of the coroner and in consultation with any licensed
physician and surgeon conducting an autopsy; (5) require all
persons in the autopsy suite to be informed of the risks
presented by bloodborne pathogens and that they should wear
personal protective equipment, rather than requiring them to
have current bloodborne pathogen training; (6) require an
autopsy in any case where an infant has died suddenly and
unexpectedly to be conducted pursuant to a standardized protocol
developed by the Department of Public Health, rather than the
Department of Health Care Services; and (7) delete some
conforming changes that were made in the Senate to other
portions of the Government Code that references autopsies.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1)Requires a county coroner to inquire into and determine the
SB 1189
Page 3
circumstances, manner, and cause of certain deaths. Requires a
county coroner, under certain circumstances, to perform, or
cause to be performed, an autopsy on a decedent.
2)Imposes certain requirements on a coroner conducting a
postmortem examination or autopsy on conducted at the
discretion of a coroner, ME, or other agency upon an
unidentified body or human remains.
3)Permits a county Board of Supervisors to consolidate the
duties of certain county offices in one or more of specified
combinations, including, but not limited to, sheriff and
coroner, district attorney and coroner, and public
administrator and coroner. Permits a county Board of
Supervisors to abolish the office of coroner and provide
instead for the office of ME, as specified, and requires the
ME to be a licensed physician and surgeon duly qualified as a
specialist in pathology.
4)Makes it a crime for any person to practice or attempt to
practice, or to advertise or hold himself or herself out as
practicing, any system or mode of treating the sick or
afflicted in this state, or to diagnose, treat, operate for,
or prescribe for any ailment, blemish, deformity, disease,
disfigurement, disorder, injury, or other physical or mental
condition of any person, without having at the time of so
doing a valid, unrevoked, or unsuspended license as a
physician or without being authorized to perform the act
pursuant to a certificate, punishable by a fine up to $10,000,
by imprisonment, or by both the fine and either imprisonment.
This bill:
1)Requires a forensic autopsy to only be conducted by a licensed
physician and surgeon. Requires the results of a forensic
autopsy to only be determined by a licensed physician and
surgeon.
2)Defines a forensic autopsy as an examination of a body of a
decedent to generate medical evidence for which the cause of
death is determined. Permits trained county personnel who are
necessary to the performance of an autopsy, at the direction
SB 1189
Page 4
and supervision of a coroner, an ME, or a licensed physician
and surgeon, to take body measurements or retrieve blood,
urine, or vitreous samples from the body of a decedent.
3)Defines a postmortem examination as the external examination
of the body where no cause of death is determined.
4)Requires all persons in the autopsy suite to be informed of
the risks presented by bloodborne pathogens and that they
should wear personal protective equipment, as specified.
5)Permits only individuals who are directly involved in the
investigation of the death of the decedent to be present
during the performance.
6)Prohibits, if an individual dies due to the involvement of law
enforcement activity, law enforcement personnel directly
involved with the care and custody of that individual from
being involved with any portion of the postmortem examination
nor allowed inside the autopsy suite during the performance of
the autopsy.
7)Requires police reports, crime scene or other information,
videos, or laboratory tests that are in the possession of law
enforcement and are related to a death that is incident to law
enforcement activity to be made available to the physician and
surgeon who conducts the autopsy prior to the completion of
the investigation of the death.
8)Makes conforming changes to other portions of the Government
Code that references autopsies.
9)Prohibits this bill from being construed to limit the practice
of an autopsy for educational or research purposes.
Comments
1)Author's statement. According to the author, autopsy reports
are valuable documents that should be accurate and unbiased. A
medically trained physician or surgeon, particularly one
trained in forensic pathology, is best equipped to determine
the cause of death and provide an accurate report. Clarifying
SB 1189
Page 5
that a medically trained professional should be the one who
conducts the autopsy also leaves out ambiguities in current
law. Equally important is the safety of the coroners and
others in the autopsy room. By requiring all personnel to wear
protective gear and to get proper training in blood borne
pathogens, health risks and contamination of the results are
significantly reduced. SB 1189 ensures that coroners are
protected and able to conduct precise autopsy reports.
2)Sheriff-coroner vs. coroner/ME. Fifty of California's 58
counties have sheriff-coroner offices, which means that the
two offices are consolidated and the sheriff also serves as
the coroner. The other eight counties (Calaveras, Inyo, Los
Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, and
Ventura) have a coroner or ME that is separate from the
sheriff. Counties that do not have a separate ME or coroner
either contract with another local agency for sheriff-related
cases (for example, Marin has an interagency agreement with
Napa to perform that county's autopsies), contract with a
private independent pathologist, or employ a physician that is
not a fulltime pathologist, but does this work on a
case-by-case basis. Nothing in statute requires a coroner's
autopsy to be performed by a physician, but most (if not all)
counties follow National Association of Medical Examiners
(NAME) standards, which call for physicians to conduct
autopsies. In those counties that have abolished the
coroner's office and instead provide for an ME (San Francisco,
San Diego, Ventura, and Los Angeles), the ME has the same
powers and duties of a coroner, but the ME is required to be a
physician.
3)Ventura County ME investigation. In May 2015, Ventura County
relieved their ME of three years of his duties after it had
come to light that in some cases, he was not actually
performing postmortem exams, but his signature still appeared
on death certificates. According to a special report
published in December 2015 by the Ventura County Star, records
show 17 postmortem exams were performed during the ME's
two-week vacation in May. A part-time contract pathologist was
listed as the pathologist on 13 of the death certificates and
the ME's name was on four. Those four died, received
postmortem exams, and their bodies were released for burial or
SB 1189
Page 6
cremation before the ME returned from his vacation, but their
death certificates show that he certified cause of death for
three of the men. Emails exchanged between the ME and his
staff show that he directed an assistant without a medical
license to perform procedures on the men's bodies. For two
men, he instructed staff by email to cut open their abdomens
to take samples from internal organs. A whistleblower
initiated a complaint to the District Attorney's (DA's)
office, which commenced an investigation. The DA's
investigation revealed that non-physician staff at the ME's
office had performed these functions at least one other time
as far back as 2013. The investigation also revealed that the
ME had been contracting out his services while working for
Ventura County to a private company that provides pathology
and autopsy services, as well as Santa Barbara and Monterey
counties. The conclusion of the DA's report states that the
investigation "?exposed the need for legislation to clarify
whether the performance of an autopsy is included in the
"practice of medicine." Clarification is also necessary to
define the terms "autopsy" and "partial autopsy" and to
clearly define the qualifications and training required for
forensic examiners who conduct such procedures. The
legislature must reconcile existing law that allows
non-physicians to serve as coroners."
4)Performance of autopsies. California statute does not define
the term "autopsy," but a 1970 opinion of the California
Attorney General states that an autopsy is "a form of
postmortem examination in which a dead body is examined and at
least partially dissected for the purpose of ascertaining the
cause of death, the nature and extent of lesions of disease,
or any other abnormalities present." This meaning seems to
align with other definitions of the term, however there is
dispute in the field regarding what specific actions
constitute an autopsy and regarding the dividing line between
collecting samples and performing an autopsy. The Ventura
County report consulted with San Bernardino's Chief Medical
Examiner (Frank Sheridan, MD) to provide an expert opinion as
to the practice of pathology, the definition of "autopsy" and
the "practice of medicine." Dr. Sheridan opined that the
following actions do not constitute the practice of medicine
and need not be performed by a licensed physician: extracting
SB 1189
Page 7
vitreous fluid from the decedent's eye, extracting blood from
vessels, extracting urine from the bladder with a needle, and
making an incision in the quadriceps muscle to collect a
sample of tissue. Dr. Sheridan also stated there was no
consensus within the field of pathology that the
aforementioned procedures, which could be accomplished without
opening any internal cavities, would constitute performance of
an autopsy. He indicated these types of procedures could be
performed by a pathologists' assistant without a physician
present.
Dr. Sheridan opined that an autopsy occurs when an internal
cavity is opened and organs are examined and/or samples taken
for the purpose of determining the cause or manner of death.
He considers such actions to be the practice of medicine. He
feels there is consensus within the field of pathology on
these points. However, he is not aware of any law that
specifically requires such actions be performed by a licensed
physician, nor is he aware of any law that specifically
prohibits a pathologists' assistant from cutting into the body
and obtaining samples without a physician present. Dr.
Sheridan based his opinions in large part on the NAME
standards. However, he acknowledged that there is debate
within the field of forensic pathology as to whether these
standards should be considered best practices guidelines or
requirements that must be followed. He stated that
pathologists in smaller counties, with smaller budgets, do not
believe they can comply with NAME standards because of the
costs involved in doing so.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: Yes
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
1)The Department of Consumer Affairs reports that this bill will
have no fiscal impact.
2)Potential minor reimbursable mandated costs, but so minor that
it is doubtful a mandate claim will be submitted.
SUPPORT: (Verified 8/23/16)
SB 1189
Page 8
Union of American Physicians and Dentists (source)
Consumer Attorneys of California
Medical Board of California
National Association of Medical Examiners
Three individuals
OPPOSITION: (Verified 8/23/16)
None received
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The Union of American Physicians and
Dentists write that elected officials lack the medical expertise
necessary to perform a postmortem examination to the same degree
as a forensic pathologist, and this bill seeks to add further
legitimacy and authority to death investigations in coroner
cases. NAME writes that determining the cause and manner of
death should be performed by a medical professional with the
expertise to make those medical diagnoses. NAME furthers states
that MEs and forensic pathologists and deaths in custody or
associated with law enforcement personnel are some of the most
highly contentious deaths and can generate a tremendous amount
of public interest, and all affected parties must be able to
trust that the professionals investigating these deaths are free
of undue influence from the law enforcement personnel who may
have been involved in that individual's death. Consumer
Attorneys of California writes that it is a conflict of interest
to allow the law enforcement personnel, a potential defendant in
a civil or criminal action, to be allowed inside the autopsy
room during the performance of an autopsy.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 79-0, 8/23/16
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,
Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke,
Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley,
Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth
Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto,
Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger
Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey,
Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes,
McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte,
SB 1189
Page 9
O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,
Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,
Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Gordon
Prepared by:Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
8/23/16 20:06:40
**** END ****