BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  August 3, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          SB 1192  
          (Hill) - As Amended June 16, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Higher Education               |Vote:|10 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Business and Professions       |     |12 - 2       |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill makes numerous changes to the California Private  
          Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, including:










                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  2





          1)Requiring a private entity with no physical presence in this  
            state that provides postsecondary education to California  
            students to comply with specified provisions of the Act,  
            including registering with the Bureau for Private  
            Postsecondary Education (BPPE), and requiring the BPPE to  
            adopt regulations for the process and procedure whereby an  
            institution can apply for and obtain registration.


          2)Increasing the required penalty for operating an institution  
            without BPPE approval from $50,000 to $100,000.
          3)Requiring the Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs  
            (DCA) to appoint an enforcement monitor for a period of two  
            years to monitor the BPPE's enforcement efforts, with a  
            specific concentration on the adequacy of bureau compliance  
            inspections, handling and processing of student complaints,  
            and timely application of sanctions or discipline imposed on  
            institutions and persons in order to protect the public.


          4)Establishing an Office of Student Assistance and Relief  
            (OSAR), within DCA, to serve as a primary point of contact to  
            address the needs of private postsecondary education students  
            and to administer the Student Tuition Recovery Fund (STRF).  
            The OSAR is to be headed by an ombudsperson appointed by the  
            Director of DCA.


          5)Establishing a Pilot Program until January 1, 2021, to be  
            administered by the OSAR, to provide grants to community-based  
            organizations to assist students harmed by recent school  
            closures with receiving relief under loan forgiveness and  
            STRF, and appropriates $1.3 million from the STRF for this  
            purpose.


          6)Providing that a student who was enrolled at a California  
            campus of Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (CCI), or was a California  
            student enrolled in an online program offered by an  








                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  3





            out-of-state campus of a CCI institution, who was enrolled as  
            of June 20, 2014, and meets all of the other eligibility  
            requirements is eligible for STRF.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Enforcement Monitor. Annual cost of around $200,000 for two  
            years to contract for the enforcement monitor. [BPPE  
            Administration Fund]


          2)Out-of-State Registration and Enforcement. The BPPE estimates  
            approximately 500 out-of-state institutions will register with  
            the Bureau to provide online education to California students.  
             Ongoing cost will be around $170,000 for two positions to  
            register these institutions and to work with students and the  
            out-of-state institution's home regulatory body or accrediting  
            agency to ensure compliance with the Act. [BPPE Administration  
            Fund]





          3)OSAR. In addition to the one-time STRF appropriation of $1.3  
            million for grants to community-based organizations, ongoing  
            costs will be $600,000 for six positions to fulfill the new  
            office's responsibilities. [BPPE Administration Fund]



          4)Corinthian Students. The Bureau estimates approximately 9,000  
            Heald and 117 Everest Online students were impacted by the  
            Corinthian closure. The Bureau indicates that approximately  
            eight percent of those students attending Corinthian  
            institutions (Wyotech and Everest) regulated by the Bureau  
            submitted a STRF claim and 39 percent of those claims were  








                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  4





            approved, with an average payout of $3,800. Assuming the same  
            application and approval rates for all students, the Bureau  
            would receive 720 STRF claims, of which 39 percent. (281  
            cases) would be approved, for a total STRF payout of almost  
            $1.1 million [STRF]. The number of applications and approvals  
            could be larger, however, with the assistance provided to  
            nonprofits under contract to OSAR. The Bureau will also  
            require $190,000 for two years for two positions to administer  
            this assistance. [BPPE Administration Fund]



          5)Office Space. The BPPE indicates that the additional positions  
            described above will require larger office space, resulting in  
            $1 million in one-time moving costs and $250,000 annually in  
            increased rental charges. [BPPE Administration Fund]



          6)Increased Revenue. Increasing, from $50,000 to $100,000, the  
            fine that may be issued to a person for operating an  
            institution without proper approval to operate will increase  
            revenues by about $300,000 per year to the BPPE Administrative  
            Fund.



          7)Fund Condition. The BPPE Administrative Fund is projected to  
            have a balance of only about $200,000 as of June 30, 2017, and  
            thus would not be able to absorb all of the additional costs  
            described above.
            


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. In March, the Assembly Committee on Business and  
            Professions and the Senate Committee on Business, Professions  








                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  5





            and Economic Development conducted multiple joint oversight  
            hearings to review 11 regulatory boards within the DCA and one  
            regulatory entity outside of the DCA. The sunset bills,  
            including SB 1192, are intended to implement legislative  
            changes recommended in the respective background reports  
            drafted by the Committees for the agencies reviewed this year.  
            The sunset review process provides a formal mechanism for the  
            DCA; the Legislature; the regulatory boards, bureaus and  
            committees; interested parties; and stakeholders to make  
            recommendations for improvements to the authority of consumer  
            protection boards and bureaus.  


          2)Background. After numerous legislative attempts to remedy the  
            laws and structure governing regulation of private  
            postsecondary institutions, the Act-AB 48 (Portantino),  
            Chapter 310, Statutes of 2009-established a foundation for  
            oversight and gave the BPPE enforcement tools to ensure  
            schools comply with the law. SB 1247 (Lieu), Chapter 840,  
            Statutes of 2014 reauthorized the Act until January 1, 2017,  
            and made a series of changes aimed at reducing backlogs and  
            increasing meaningful enforcement.


          3)Private Postsecondary Institutions. Most students attending  
            BPPE-regulated institutions are enrolled in multi-campus,  
            publicly-traded institutions with a national presence.  
            According to the 2014 Annual Report (self-reported data from  
            BPPE-approved institutions), of the 275,624 students enrolled,  
            161,226 were enrolled in 337 institutions that received $5.8  
            billion in federal Title IV financial aid. In response to  
            high-profile state and federal investigations that revealed  
            deceptive and illegal practices by some institutions within  
            this sector, federal regulators responded by increasing  
            student outcome and institutional accountability measures. For  
            California, BPPE's approval can enable these institutions to  
            access the Title IV program, with the US Department of  
            Education relying on the bureau to provide oversight and  
            student protection.








                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  6







          4)Related Legislation. AB 2581 (Medina) provides assistance to  
            students of Heald, Everest, and WyoTech campuses in California  
            that were owned by CCI and closed unlawfully on April 27,  
            2015. AB 2581 was not heard in Senate Business and  
            Professions.


            AB  2652 (Eggman), contains provision similar to those in this  
            bill that require a private entity with no physical presence  
            in this state, that would be subject to the requirements of  
            the Act if the entity was located in this state, to register  
            with the BPPE and participate in the STRF. AB 2652 was not  
            heard in Senate Business and Professions.


          5)Sunset Extension. This bill currently lacks an extension of  
            the act beyond the current sunset date of January 1, 2017. The  
            length of the sunset extension is currently a subject of  
            negotiations.


          6)OSAR Staffing and Funding. The bill appropriates $1.3 million  
            from the STRF to the OSAR for the pilot program, yet OSAR,  
            which is proposed to be independent from the BPPE, will not be  
            established until January 1, 2017, and will likely not have  
            operational funding until enactment of the 2017-18 Budget Act  
            next July. In the interest of providing more immediate  
            assistance to students, the author may wish to instead  
            consider making the appropriation to the BPPE, and vesting the  
            bureau with the pilot program until OSAR is able to assume  
            this responsibility.


          Analysis Prepared by:Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081










                                                                    SB 1192  


                                                                    Page  7