BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 1214 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 1214 (Allen) As Amended June 23, 2016 Majority vote SENATE VOTE: 27-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Higher |11-0 |Medina, Baker, | | |Education | |Chávez, Irwin, | | | | |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, | | | | |Linder, Low, | | | | |Santiago, Weber, | | | | |Williams | | | | | | | |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |17-3 |Gonzalez, Bloom, |Bigelow, Jones, | | | |Bonilla, Bonta, |Wagner | | | |Calderon, Chang, | | | | |Daly, Eggman, | | | | |Gallagher, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Holden, Obernolte, | | SB 1214 Page 2 | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Weber, Wood, Chau | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY: Extends the sunset on the authority of the University of California (UC) to use the best value procurement method at all its campuses and medical centers. Specifically, this bill: 1)Extends the sunset by one year, until January 1, 2018, on the authority of the UC Regents to use the best value procurement method for projects over $1 million at all its campuses and medical centers. 2)Deletes obsolete reporting requirements. 3)Makes several technical and conforming changes. EXISTING LAW: 1)Authorizes, until January 1, 2017, a pilot program at the UC to award construction contracts over $1 million, on a "best value" basis, rather than just to the lowest bid (Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 10506.4). 2)Defines "best value," for purposes of the UC, as a procurement process whereby, the lowest responsible bidder may be selected on the basis of objective criteria with the resulting selection representing the best combination of price and qualifications (PCC Section 10506.5). SB 1214 Page 3 3)Requires the UC Regents, on or before January 1, 2016, to submit a report to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, regarding the UC's best value pilot (PCC Section 10506.8). 4)Establishes a pilot program to authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to use a best value procurement method, before December 31, 2020, for public projects that exceed $1 million, and requires submission of specified reports on the use of this procurement method (PCC Sections 20119 - 20119.7). FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, based on the results to date of UC's use of best value procurement, the university could realize additional significant savings in contract and contract administration costs for the additional year that this authority is extended under this bill. COMMENTS: History of UC Best Value Pilot. SB 667 (Migden), Chapter 367, Statutes of 2006, created the UC Best Value Pilot, authorized for five years, solely at UC's San Francisco campus (UCSF). SB 667 allowed UCSF to award contracts based on the best value for the university. Under this process, UC prequalifies bidders, then evaluates the bid based on answers to a separate best value questionnaire and assigns a qualification score. UC then divides each bidder's price by its qualification score. The lowest resulting cost per quality point represents the best value bid. Senate Bill 835 (Wolk), Chapter 636, Statutes of 2011, extended the sunset in SB 667 and expanded the best value pilot to all UC campuses and medical centers for five more years; with a status report due to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, on or before January 1, 2016. SB 1214 Page 4 According to the UC "Report on the Best Value Construction Contract Pilot Program", issued in December 2015, since January 2012, UC awarded over 320 construction contracts totaling $4.05 billion. Forty of these contracts, or 13%, totaling $1.19 billion, utilized the best value construction authority. Additionally, the report finds that given the additional time and administrative requirements associated with the best value selection process, the UC screens its projects carefully to maximize the value obtained from said process. To note, according to the author's office, when SB 835 was initially debated in the Legislature, some legislators expressed concerns that granting best value authority to the UC would allow for subjectivity and favoritism to enter into the selection process. However, according to the report, "To date, no bidder, or third-party for that matter, has protested any qualification score determined by the University's BV [best value] Contractor Selection scoring committees." Lastly, the report finds that UC's best value pilot has fostered improved cooperative project administration, better quality work, less labor and safety violations, better qualified contractors, more on-time completion of projects, and increased on-budget performance. Need for the measure. According to the author, "Best Value contracting is far more effective at selecting contractors who will provide the lowest finished cost as opposed to selecting contractors on the basis of the lowest first cost." The author contends that best value contracting has been met with praise from the design and contracting community and that the loss of UC's authority to offer best value contracting would be to the detriment of students, patients, researchers, faculty, and the taxpayers of California. SB 1214 Page 5 Related legislation. SB 667 (Migden), SB 835 (Wolk) - as described in the "History of the UC Best Value Pilot" section of this analysis, and AB 1185 (Ridley-Thomas), Chapter 786, Statutes of 2015, which, among others, authorizes the Los Angeles Unified School District to utilize a best value procurement process as a pilot project until January 1, 2021, for construction projects over $1 million. Analysis Prepared by: Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960 FN: 0003786