BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1225  


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  August 3, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          SB 1225  
          (Mendoza) - As Amended May 31, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Education                      |Vote:|5 - 1        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          Yes


          SUMMARY:


          This bill creates the Teachers Bill of Rights Act and requires  
          the principal of each school to ensure a conspicuous notice of  
          specified teacher rights is posted in a common area of  
          administrative offices. Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Requires the first line of the notice to only include the  
            words "Every California teacher has the right to the  
            following".  










                                                                    SB 1225  


                                                                    Page  2





          2)Requires specific wording, and placement of wording, for the  
            notice, for example 10 bulleted categories that address the  
            following: health and safety requirements, overall teaching  
            environment, the principal as the master teacher, access to  
            basic supplies, input on curriculum, adequate class sizes,  
            collective bargaining rights, competitive salary and benefits,  
            access to quality professional development, fair evaluations,  
            and due process rights.


          3)Specifies the rights delineated in the bill are declaratory of  
            existing law. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Unknown one-time state-mandated costs, likely in the hundreds  
            of thousands of dollars, for each school to produce and post  
            the notice in administrative areas.  There are approximately  
            12,000 schools statewide that would need to produce and post  
            the notice. Assuming a cost of $50 per site, statewide costs  
            would be $600,000.  Additional costs could be incurred in the  
            out-years to the extent the notice needs to be updated. 


          2)Unknown, potentially significant, state cost pressure to the  
            extent the rights provided in the notice are not declaratory  
            of existing law and require districts to provide additional  
            services and benefits.   


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author's office, there is a  
            Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights and a Peace Officers  
            Procedural Bill of Rights in the Government Code.  The author  
            is proposing to establish a Teachers Bill of Rights to address  








                                                                    SB 1225  


                                                                    Page  3





            recruitment and retention of teachers and make it possible for  
            teachers to perform their duties comfortably.


          2)Opposition. The California Association of School Business  
            Officials (CASBO) is opposed to this bill unless amended.   
            CASBO is concerned that the tone of the bill makes the  
            assumption that school districts and principals do not have  
            the best interest of their staff in mind. This language is  
            potentially harmful, failing to recognize the significant  
            efforts underway as school districts rebuild services and  
            programs that were affected by the Great Recession. 


            The bill also assumes that a school site controls specific  
            rights that are actually collectively bargained between the  
            school district and the representing bargaining units. CASBO  
            notes there are several rights listed in the bill that are  
            linked to adequate funding for instructional materials,  
            professional development, compensation, and class size  
            reduction. School sites do not control the level of funding  
            that will be appropriated to their site, as the public  
            education finance system is based largely on state funding  
            appropriated through Proposition 98 and distributed on a new  
            funding formula named the Local Control Funding Formula.  
            School districts and their local governing school boards are  
            held accountable for the prioritization of funding to meet  
            8-statewide priorities and their own locally established  
            goals. CASBO understands the intent of the author but believes  
            more time is needed to develop language that will foster a  
            collaborative and empowered educational system.


          Analysis Prepared by:Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081












                                                                    SB 1225  


                                                                    Page  4