Amended in Senate April 18, 2016

Amended in Senate March 29, 2016

Senate BillNo. 1241


Introduced by Senator Wieckowski

February 18, 2016


An act to add Section 1799.208 to the Civil Code,begin insert and to add Section 925 to the Labor Code,end insert relating tobegin delete consumerend delete contracts.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1241, as amended, Wieckowski. begin deleteConsumer contracts. end deletebegin insertContracts.end insert

Existing law, the Consumer Contract Awareness Act, defines a consumer contract as a writing prepared by a seller that provides for the sale or lease of goods orbegin delete servicesend deletebegin insert services or the extension of credit, as specified,end insert for personal, family, or household purposes, among other provisions. The actbegin delete require a sellerend deletebegin insert requires a seller, which includes financial institutions,end insert to deliver a copy of a consumer contract to the consumer at the time the contract is signed, and it prohibits the waiver of any provisions of the act.

This billbegin delete would, in addition, provideend deletebegin insert would provide, for contracts entered into, modified, or extended on or after January 1, 2017,end insert that a provision in a consumer contract that purports to designate the venue in which a controversy arising from the consumer contract is litigated, or the choice of law to be applied, is voidable by the consumer, with respect to a controversy arising in California, if the provision would deprive the consumer of the protection of California law or require the consumer to litigate the controversy out of state.begin insert The bill would prohibit a seller from requiring a consumer to agree to these voidable provisions as a condition of entering into a contract regulated by the act, and would provide that such provisions, if required, are inoperative and California law applies in its place. The bill would specify that injunctive relief is available in this context and that a court may award a plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees. The bill would include arbitration with litigation for purposes of these provisions.end insert

begin insert

This bill also would create an analogous set of rights, prohibitions, and requirements, as described above, in connection with employment contracts.

end insert

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 1799.208 is added to the Civil Code, to
2read:

3

1799.208.  

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision in
4a consumerbegin delete contract, as defined by subdivision (b) of Section
51799.201,end delete
begin insert contractend insert that purports to designate the venue in which
6a controversy arising from the consumer contract may be litigated,
7or the choice of law to be applied, is voidable by the consumer if
8the provision would do either of the following:

9(1) Deprive the consumer of the protection of California law
10with respect to a controversy arising in California.

11(2) Require the consumer to litigate outside of California a claim
12arising in California.

begin insert

13
(b) A seller shall not require a consumer to agree to a provision
14as described in subdivision (a) as a condition of entering into a
15contract regulated by this title, and if such a provision is required,
16it shall be inoperative and California law shall apply in its place.

end insert
begin insert

17
(c) In addition to injunctive relief and any other remedies
18available, a court may award a plaintiff who is enforcing his or
19her rights under this section reasonable attorney’s fees.

end insert
begin delete

20(b)

end delete

21begin insert(d)end insert For purposes of this section, litigation includes arbitration.

begin insert

22
(e) This section shall apply to a contract entered into, modified,
23or extended on or after January 1, 2017.

end insert
24begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 925 is added to the end insertbegin insertLabor Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert

begin insert
25

begin insert925.end insert  

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, a provision in an
26employment contract that purports to designate the venue in which
27a controversy arising from the employment contract may be
P3    1litigated, or the choice of law to be applied, is voidable by the
2employee if the provision would do either of the following:

3
(1) Deprive the employee of the protection of California law
4with respect to a controversy arising in California.

5
(2) Require the employee to litigate outside of California a claim
6arising in California.

7
(b) An employer shall not require a person to agree to a
8provision as described in subdivision (a) as a condition of entering
9into an employment contract, and if such a provision is required,
10it shall be inoperative and California law shall apply in its place.

11
(c) In addition to injunctive relief and any other remedies
12available, a court may award a plaintiff who is enforcing his or
13her rights under this section reasonable attorney’s fees.

14
(d) For purposes of this section, litigation includes arbitration.

15
(e) This section shall apply to a contract entered into, modified,
16or extended on or after January 1, 2017.

end insert


O

    97