BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 1263 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 14, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS Luis Alejo, Chair SB 1263 (Wieckowski) - As Amended June 8, 2016 SENATE VOTE: 21-13 SUBJECT: Public water system: permits SUMMARY: Requires a person submitting an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system to first submit a preliminary technical report to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) at least six months before initiating construction of any water-related development. Authorizes the State Water Board to deny a permit for a new public water system if it is feasible to connect to an existing system or if the new public water system is unsustainable. Specifically, this bill: 1)States that "water-related improvement" includes, but is not limited to, a water pipe, a water pump, or drinking water infrastructure. 2)Requires a person submitting an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system to, at least six months before initiating construction of any water-related improvement, first submit a preliminary technical report to SB 1263 Page 2 the State Water Board. 3)Encourages, but does not require, a person considering submitting an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system to, within seven days of an application for a building permit for any water-related improvement, submit the preliminary technical report to the city or county. 4)Requires an applicant for a permit for a proposed new public water system that would be regulated by a local primary agency to submit a copy of the preliminary technical report to the State Water Board. 5)Requires the preliminary technical report, for a proposed new public water system, to include all of the following: a. The name of each existing public water system for which any service area boundary is within three miles, as measured through existing public rights-of-ways, of any boundary of the applicant's proposed public water system's service area; b. A discussion of the feasibility of each of the adjacent public water systems annexing, connecting, or otherwise supplying domestic water to the applicant's new proposed public water system's service area. Requires the applicant to consult with an adjacent public water system in preparing the report and include in the preliminary technical report any information provided by an adjacent public water system regarding the feasibility of annexing, connecting, or otherwise supplying domestic water to that service area; SB 1263 Page 3 c. A discussion of all actions taken by the applicant to secure a supply of domestic water from an existing public water system for the proposed new public water system's service area; d. All sources of domestic water supply for the proposed new public water system; e. The estimated cost to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed new public water system, including long-term operation and maintenance costs and a potential rate structure; f. A comparison of the costs associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance, and long-term sustainability of the proposed new public water system to the costs associated with providing water to the proposed new public water system's service area through annexation by, consolidation with, or connection to an existing public water system; g. A discussion of all actions taken by the applicant to pursue a contract for managerial or operational oversight from an existing public water system; and, h. An analysis of whether a new proposed public water system's total projected water supplies available during normal, single dry, or multiple dry water years during a 20-year projection will meet the projected water demand for the service area. 6)Authorizes an applicant for a new proposed public water system to submit documents to the State Water Board, prepared to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), or any other application for public agency approval concerning providing drinking water to the new proposed public water system's service area, if those documents include the information required by the preliminary technical report, in lieu of the preliminary technical report and provides that SB 1263 Page 4 these documents shall be considered the functional equivalent of the preliminary technical report. 7)Authorizes an applicant for a new proposed public water system to submit the preliminary technical report and documents to the State Water Board, prepared to comply with the CEQA, or any other application for public agency approval concerning providing drinking water to the new proposed public water system's service area, if those documents include some, but not necessarily all, of the information required by the preliminary technical report, provides that together those documents and the preliminary technical report shall be considered the functional equivalent of the preliminary technical report. Provides that a preliminary technical report submitted via this process shall only be required to include information that is not otherwise addressed by the other submitted documents. 8)Upon review of a preliminary technical report submitted, the State Water Board may do all of the following: a. Direct, if the applicant has not already sought annexation or an extension of services agreement from the local agency formation commission, the applicant to undertake additional discussion and negotiation with any existing public water system that is within three miles of the boundaries of the proposed public water system and that the State Water Board determines has the technical, managerial, and financial capacity to provide an adequate and reliable supply of domestic water to the service area of the proposed new public water system. Prohibits the State Water Board from directing the applicant to undertake additional discussion and negotiation if documentation submitted to the State Water Board demonstrates that additional discussion and negotiation is unlikely to be successful, including, but not limited to, SB 1263 Page 5 documentation that a local agency formation commission has already denied the application for an extension or annexation; b. Direct the applicant to report on the results of discussion and negotiations to the State Water Board; and, c. Establish a time schedule for the applicant's performance of directives issued by the State Water Board. 9)Requires an applicant for a proposed new public water system to comply with the State Water Board's directives before submitting an application for a permit for a proposed new public water system. 10)Provides that an application for a permit for a new public water system from being deemed complete unless the applicant has submitted the preliminary technical report and complied with the State Water Board's directives. 11)Provides that the State Water Board's review of a preliminary technical report shall not be deemed to be an approval of a project or approval of a permit application submitted to the State Water Board. 12)Provides that the requirements for the submittal of a preliminary technical report do not apply to an application for a permit for a new public water system that was deemed complete prior to January 1, 2017. 13)Provides that the requirements for the submittal of a preliminary technical report do not apply to a service area where an applicant certifies in writing to the State Water Board that the applicant will not rely on the establishment of a new public water system for its water supply. Requires the SB 1263 Page 6 State Water Board to acknowledge receipt of the applicant's certification in a timely manner. 14)Requires an applicant for a new proposed public water system, who certifies that the service area will not rely on the establishment of a new public water system, and later seeks a permit for a new public water system, to comply with the preliminary technical report requirements and directives of the State Water Board as required by this bill and to assume all risk of delay or rejection related to the permit application. 15)Requires applicants of a proposed new public water system that a) consolidates two or more existing public water systems, existing state small water systems, or other existing water systems which results in the creation of a new public water system; and/or, b) provides water service in lieu of individual domestic wells, to comply with each of the following: a. Requires at least six months before the construction of any water-related improvements, an applicant for a new public water system to provide a written notice to the State Water Board that clearly describes the proposed new public water system including how it meets the criteria of either a) or b) and requests an exemption from the requirements of submitting a preliminary technical report. b. Requires the State Water Board to promptly acknowledge receipt of the written notice provided by the applicant. Requires the State Water Board, within 30 days of acknowledging receipt of the written notice, to issue a written notice to the applicant that compliance with the requirements of the preliminary technical report and directives of the State Water Board is necessary and that an application for a permit of a new public water system is not complete until the applicant has complied with the requirements for a preliminary technical report and directives by the State Water Board. States that a SB 1263 Page 7 determination by the State Water Board regarding compliance with the preliminary technical report and directives by the State Water Board are final and not subject to review. This determination by the State Water Board is not considered a project subject to CEQA. c. Provides that the project described in the written notice to the State Water Board is exempt from complying with the requirements of the preliminary technical report and directives by the State Water Board on the 35th day following the date of the State Water Board's acknowledgement of receipt of the written notice, unless the State Water Board has issued a notice to comply with the preliminary technical report and directives by the State Water Board. 16)Authorizes the State Water Board to impose technical, financial or managerial requirements as part of a permit for a proposed public water system. 17)Prohibits a local primacy agency from issuing a permit for a new proposed public water system without the concurrence of the State Water Board. 18)Requires the State Water Board, in consideration of whether to approve a proposed new public water system, to consider the sustainability of the proposed new public water system and its water supply in the reasonably foreseeable future, in view of global climate change, potential migration of groundwater contamination and other potential treatment needs, and other factors that can significantly erode a system's capacity. 19)Authorizes the State Water Board to deny a permit for a proposed new public water system if it determines either of the following: a. That it is feasible for the service area of the proposed new public water system addressed by an application to be served by one or more currently SB 1263 Page 8 permitted public water systems; or, b. That the proposed new public water system may lack the technical, managerial, or financial capacity to sustainably provide affordable, safe drinking water in the reasonably foreseeable future based on the State Water Board's assessment of the preliminary technical report, the permit application, relevant substantial evidence, or other factors considered. 20)Authorizes an applicant to appeal decisions and actions of the deputy director taken when issuing or denying a permit for a new proposed public water system to the State Water Board. 21)Prohibits a city, including a charter city, or a county from issuing a building permit for the construction of a new residential development where a source of water supply is water transported by water hauler, bottled water, a water-vending machine or a retail water facility. EXISTING LAW: 1)Vests the State Water Board with all of the authority, duties, powers, purposes, functions, responsibilities, and jurisdiction of the State Department of Public Health and its predecessor to enforce the State Drinking Water Act (SDWA). (Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 116271) 2)Prohibits any person from operating a public water system unless he or she first submits an application to the State Water Board and receives a permit. Requires the submittal of a new application when there is a change in ownership of a public water system. (HSC § 116525) SB 1263 Page 9 3)Requires a public water system to submit a technical report to the State Water Board as part of the permit application for a new water system or when otherwise required by the State Water Board. Authorizes the report to include, but not be limited to, detailed plans and specifications, water quality information, and physical descriptions of the existing or proposed system, and financial assurance information. (HSC § 116530) 4)Requires the State Water Board, upon determination that an application for a public water system is complete, to make a thorough investigation of the proposed or existing plant, works, system, or water supply, and all other circumstances and conditions that it deems material, including any financial assurance information. (HSC § 116535) 5)Requires the State Water Board, following completion of its required investigation, to issue or deny the permit for a public water system. Authorizes the State Water Board to impose permit conditions, requirements for system improvements, and time schedules as it deems necessary to ensure a reliable and adequate supply of water at all times that is pure, wholesome, potable, and does not endanger the health of consumers. (HSC § 116540) 6)Authorizes the State Water Board, prior to the issuance of any new, revised, renewed or amended permit, or the denial of a permit, to conduct a public hearing to obtain additional public comment. (HSC § 116545) 7)Requires any person who owns a public water system to ensure that the system does all of the following: a) Complies with primary and secondary drinking water standards; SB 1263 Page 10 b) Will not be subject to backflow under normal operating conditions; c) Provides a reliable and adequate supply of pure, wholesome, healthful, and potable water; d) Employs or utilizes only water treatment operators or water treatment operators-in-training that have been certified by the State Water Board at the appropriate grade; and, e) Complies with the operator certification program. (HSC § 116555 (a)) 1)Requires the State Water Board to appoint a deputy director who reports to the executive director to oversee the issuance and enforcement of the public water system permits. Requires the deputy director to have public health expertise (HSC § 116271 (k)(1)) 2)Delegates to the deputy director, who oversees the issuance and enforcement of public water system permits, the State Water Board's authority to provide notice, approve notice content, approve emergency notification plans, and take other action, to issue, renew, reissue, revise, amend or deny any public water system permits, to suspend or revoke any public water system permit, and to issue citations, assess penalties, or issue order. (HSC § 116271 (k)(2)) 3)Defines a "public water system" as a system for the provision of water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances that has 15 or more service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. (HSC § 116275) 4)Defines a "local primacy agency" as a local health officer that has applied for and received primacy delegation from the State Water Board. (HSC § 116275 (r)) 5)Declares to be the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking and SB 1263 Page 11 sanitary purposes. (Water Code § 106.3) FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: Need for the bill: According to the author: "When Californians turn on their water at the kitchen sink, they assume that it's safe, quality drinking water that meets all the government standards. But in many communities, especially those connected to the small public water systems, the high quality of drinking water should not be taken for granted. California has more than 7,600 public water systems and these smaller systems can be challenged over the long term by their lack of technical, financial and managerial abilities. The author introduced the bill to give the State Water Board a stronger role in ensuring such systems are not approved if they are unnecessary. SB 1263 will limit the proliferation of new, unsustainable public water systems by creating a strengthened review process for new system applications. Enhanced procedures include submission and consideration of preliminary technical reports that include discussions of existing water systems adjacent to the applicant service area, the feasibility of these adjacent SB 1263 Page 12 systems providing water to the service area, proposed sources of domestic water for the proposed water system, and estimated costs of development and long-term operations and maintenance of the proposed system versus costs to rate payers associated with connecting to an existing system. With its requirements for preliminary technical report, SB 1263 will strengthen the public water system permitting process by systematizing and making more transparent the analytical due diligence that developers typically do." California's drinking water program: Senate Bill 861 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 35, Statutes of 2014) transferred the Drinking Water Program from the Department of Public Health (DPH) to the State Water Board effective July 1, 2014 creating the new Division of Drinking Water within the State Water Board and made other statutory changes to create efficiencies and adoption and administration of the Drinking Water Program. The State Water Board directly enforces the federal Safe Drinking Water Act for all large water systems (those with 200 or more service connections). For small water systems (those with less than 200 connections), local health departments can be delegated to have regulatory authority as the local primacy agency. Human right to water: In 2012, California became the first state to enact a Human Right to Water law, AB 685 (Chapter 524, Statutes of 2012). Public policy continues to be focused on the right of every human being to have safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water adequate for human consumption, cooking, and sanitation. Water supply, contaminants, costs of treatment and distribution systems, the number and nature of small public SB 1263 Page 13 water systems, especially in disadvantaged communities, and many other factors will continue to challenge progress in addressing the Human Right to Water. Framework for affordable, safe drinking water: Governor Jerry Brown's Administration has a framework for resilient, affordable, safe drinking water for disadvantaged communities. The goal of this framework is to ensure that every Californian has access to an adequate supply of safe water for daily human needs. According to the Governor's Office, this goal will be achieved by: "Making more strategic use of existing funding resources; Improving technical, managerial, and financial capacity where possible, consolidating as a second option, and if neither of those work, contracting with a third party to manage the system with a commitment to transitioning the system to a sustainable condition; and, Easing the burden on local governments by limiting the proliferation of new, unsustainable systems." There are several bills moving through the Legislature that address aspects of the Administration's framework. SB 552 (Wolk), which is being heard in the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee on June 14, 2016, addresses one aspect, by proposing to improve the technical, managerial and financial capacity of water systems by authorizing the State Water Board to appoint an administrator to a non-compliant water system. SB 1263 Page 14 SB 1263 addresses an another element meant to deal with limiting the proliferation of new, unsustainable systems. Governor Brown's Administration's framework describes this element further: "Ease the burden on local governments with new tools to limit the proliferation of new, unsustainable systems by: Requiring hookup to existing public water systems if feasible, rather than creation of new systems; Adding a requirement that the State Water Board must concur in permits issued by Local Primacy Agencies for the creation of a new water system; Reducing the threshold size of proposed residential development subject to Government Code 66473.7 from 500 to 15 dwelling units/service connections, to match the threshold for community public water systems; and , Barring approval of new communities that would rely on hauled water for a permanent water supply." Policy questions: The main policy question before the Committee is how to balance the needs of new development, which require either a new water system or a hookup to an existing water system, while restructuring the current system for new public water systems in order to encourage the interconnection of new developments with existing systems first and the creation of a new public water system as the last option. SB 1263 Page 15 In SB 1263 there are several new requirements for those seeking to submit an application for a new public water system. These include items that need to happen months before submittal of an application for a new public water system, including the drafting and submittal of a preliminary technical report, the review by the State Water Board of the preliminary technical report and directives issued by the State Water Board that the applicant is required to comply with. The bill states that an application for a permit for a new public water system is not deemed complete until it complies with the requirements of submitting the preliminary technical report and complying with the directives of the State Water Board. This is important because until these requirements are met, the application will not move forward. How long will it take for the State Water Board to review the preliminary technical permit? The bill does not specify a timeframe. While it does not seem to be the intent to hold up a permit application for a new proposed public water system without some certainty in the process, this could happen. The Committee may wish to consider options for providing finality to the State Water Board's process of reviewing the preliminary technical report. One option would be to provide a date certain whereby if the applicant has not received directives from the State Water Board, it could appeal to the State Water Board for a response and a schedule by which the State Water Board would provide a response. The bill has provided some options for applicants to speed up this process by allowing documents submitted for compliance with the CEQA to be used in whole or in part for compliance with the preliminary technical report. Additionally, SB 1263 allows a development to be exempt from the requirements of submitting the preliminary technical report if the development is going to connect to an existing system. Therefore, the major impacts of SB 1263 would be on those developments that seek a permit for a new public water system and would not connect to an existing SB 1263 Page 16 system. While the author has been working with stakeholders, however, one key issue remains: should the State Water Board be granted the authority to deny a permit to a new public water system if the new public water system cannot be sustainable on its own or if the system is able to connect to an existing system? In essence this means that a proposed public water system that is shown to be sustainable could still be denied a permit if it's feasible to connect to an existing system. Arguments in support: According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, "SB 1263 enhances permitting procedures to require submission and consideration of preliminary technical reports that include discussions of existing water systems adjacent to the applicant service area, the feasibility of these adjacent systems providing water to the service area, proposed sources of domestic water for the proposed water system, and estimated costs of development and long-term operations and maintenance of the proposed system versus costs to rate payers associated with connecting to an existing system. SB 1263 will help to strengthen the permitting process for new drinking water systems to better limit the proliferation of small, unsustainable systems. Such small systems sometimes end up without adequate water supply or fall out of compliance for contaminants and therefore threaten the health and well-being of the communities that they serve. This represents a violation of these communities' right to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible drinking water." Arguments in opposition: According to the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), "Our concern is that the bill would authorize the SWRCB to deny the permit for the system even when the new local system would be sustainable. SB 1263 Page 17 ACWA has been working with and continues to work with the Senate Environmental Quality Committee's and SWRCB's staff on amendments. The new version of the bill is not in print as of this writing, but based on a June 3, mockup, the following critical amendments are needed in addition to other minor amendments: 1) the new authority for the SWRCB to deny a permit for a new public water system should be limited to situations where the new public water system will not or may not be sustainable in the reasonably forseeable future; 2) the bill should be clear that it applies to proposed new public water systems and does not apply to any extension of or annexation to an existing public water system; and 3) the appeal provision should be clear that the appeal is to the SWRCB as opposed to SWRCB staff. The discussions on this bill have been constructive and are continuing?." Double- referral: Should this bill pass out of the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Water Parks and Wildlife Committee. Related legislation: SB 88 (Budget Committee, Chapter 27 Statutes of 2015) authorizes the State Water Board to require water systems that are serving disadvantaged communities with unreliable and unsafe drinking water to consolidate with or receive service from public water systems with safe, reliable, and adequate drinking water. SB 552 (Wolk) would authorize the State Water Board to contract with an administrator to provide administrative and managerial services to a designated public water system, as defined, to assist with the provision of an adequate and affordable supply SB 1263 Page 18 of safe drinking water. This bill is scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee on June 14, 2016. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support California League of Conservation Voters Clean Water Action Community Water Center Environment California Environmental Working Group Food and Water Watch Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability Lutheran Office of Public Policy - California Mono Lake Committee SB 1263 Page 19 Natural Resources Defense Council Sierra Club Tri-City Ecology Center Opposition Association of California Water Agencies California Apartment Association California Building Industry Association California Business Properties Association California Chamber of Commerce California Municipal Utilities Association Analysis Prepared by:Josh Tooker / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 319-3965 SB 1263 Page 20