SB 1286, as amended, Leno. Peace officers: records of misconduct.
(1) The Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act provides a set of rights and procedural protections to specified public safety officers. That act requires an administrative appeal instituted by a public agency under the act to be conducted in conformance with rules and procedures adopted by the local public agency. Existing law also establishes the Administrative Procedure Act, and requires enumerated state agencies to hold hearings under that act that are conducted by administrative law judges.
end deleteThis bill would, notwithstanding any confidentiality afforded the personnel records of peace officers or custodial officers, authorize a municipality or local public agency that employs peace officers or custodial officers to hear and adjudicate administrative appeals, or to empower a body to hear and adjudicate those appeals, in proceedings that are open to the public and in which some or all documents filed are available for public inspection.
end delete(2)
end deletebegin insert(1)end insert Existing law requires a department or agency that employs peace officers to establish a procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against those officers. Existing law authorizes a department or agency that employs custodial officers to establish a similar procedure for its officers. Existing law establishes retention requirements and access privileges, as specified, for those complaints and related reports or findings. Existing law requires the department or agency to provide written notification to the complaining party of the disposition of a complaint made pursuant to those provisions within 30 days of the disposition.
This bill would require that notification to include, at a minimum, the charges framed in response to the complaint, the agency’s disposition with respect to each of those charges, any factual findings on which the agency based its dispositions, and any discipline imposed or corrective action taken. By increasing the duties of local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3)
end deletebegin insert(2)end insert The California Public Records Act requires a state or local agency, as defined, to make public records available for inspection, subject to certain exceptions. Existing law provides that peace officer or custodial officer personnel records, as defined, and records maintained by any state or local agency relating to complaints against peace officers and custodial officers, or information obtained from these records, are confidential and prohibits the disclosure of those records in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery. Existing law describes exceptions to this policy for investigations or proceedings concerning the conduct of peace officers or custodial officers, or an agency or department that employs those officers, conducted by a grand jury, a district attorney’s office, or the Attorney General’s office.
This bill would expand the scope of the exceptions to apply to, among other things, investigations or proceedings conducted by civilian review agencies, inspectors general, personnel boards, police commissions, civil service commissions, city councils, boards of supervisors, or any entities empowered to investigate peace officer misconduct on behalf of an agency, conduct audits of peace officer discipline on behalf of an agency, adjudicate complaints against peace officers or custodial officers, hear administrative appeals, or set policies or funding for the law enforcement agency. The bill would also require an entity described in those exceptions to comply with specified confidentiality provisions.
This bill would require, notwithstanding any other law, certain peace officer or custodial officer personnel records and records relating to complaints against peace officers and custodial officers to be available for public inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act. The bill would provide that this information includes but is not limited to, the framing allegation or complaint, the agency’s full investigation file, any evidence gathered, and any findings or recommended findings, discipline, or corrective action taken. The bill would require records disclosed pursuant to this
provision to be redacted only to remove personal data or information, such as a home address, telephone number, or identities of family members, other than the names and work-related information of peace officers and custodial officers, to preserve the anonymity of complainants and witnesses, or to protect confidential medical, financial, or other information in which disclosure would cause an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy that clearly outweighs the strong public interest in records about misconduct by peace officers and custodial officers, orbegin delete whereend deletebegin insert ifend insert there is a specific, particularized reason to believe that disclosure would pose a significant danger to the physical safety of the peace officer, custodial officer, or others.begin insert
The bill would authorize an agency to withhold a record that is disclosable pursuant to these provisions during an investigation into the use of force until the peace officer’s employing agency determines whether the use of force violated a law or agency policyend insertbegin insert or until the district attorney with jurisdiction over the use of force determines whether to file criminal charges for the use of force, whichever is later, and would prohibit an agency from withholding those records for longer than 180 days from the date of the use of force.end insert
(4)
end deletebegin insert(3)end insert Existing law establishes discovery procedures for obtaining peace officer and custodial officer personnel files and files relating to complaints against peace officers and custodial officers.
This bill would specify that those provisions do not bar or limit access in any proceeding to peace officer or custodial officer personnel records or records relating to complaints against peace officers and custodial officers, and would provide that those provisions do not require a party to a proceeding pending in a court or administrative agency to seek records through alternate means before filing a motion pursuant to the discovery provisions described above.
(5)
end deletebegin insert(4)end insert The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
(6)
end deletebegin insert(5)end insert The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) Peace officers help provide one of our state’s most
4fundamental government services -- keeping our communities
5safe. These working men and women risk their lives daily in order
6to protect the people of California. The public greatly appreciates
7peace officers’ hard work and dedication to public safety. The
8good names of these public servants should not be tarnished by
9the actions of those amongst their ranks who may engage in
10wrongdoing.
11(b) To empower peace officers to fulfill their mission, the people
12of California
vest them with extraordinary authority -- the powers
13to detain, search, arrest, and use deadly force. Our society depends
14on peace officers’ faithful exercise of that authority. Its misuse
15can lead to grave constitutional violations, harms to liberty, and
16the inherent sanctity of human life, as well as significant public
17unrest.
18(c) Concealing crucial public safety matters such as officer
19violations of civilians’ rights, or inquiries into deadly use of force
20incidents, undercuts the public’s faith in the legitimacy of law
21enforcement, makes it harder for tens of thousands of hardworking
22peace officers to do their jobs, and endangers public safety.
P5 1(d) The public has a strong, compelling interest in law
2enforcement transparency because it is essential to having a just
3and
democratic society.
Section 1043 of the Evidence Code is amended to read:
(a) If discovery or disclosure is sought of peace officer
6or custodial officer personnel records or records maintained
7pursuant to Section 832.5 of the Penal Code and for which that
8section or Section 832.7 of the Penal Code bar or limit disclosure,
9or information from those records, the party seeking the discovery
10or disclosure shall file a written motion with the appropriate court
11or administrative body upon written notice to the governmental
12agency that has custody and control of the records. The written
13notice shall be given at the times prescribed by subdivision (b) of
14Section 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Upon receipt of the
15notice the governmental agency served shall immediately notify
16
the individual whose records are sought.
17(b) The motion shall include all of the following:
18(1) Identification of the proceeding in which discovery or
19disclosure is sought, the party seeking discovery or disclosure, the
20peace officer or custodial officer whose records are sought, the
21governmental agency that has custody and control of the records,
22and the time and place at which the motion for discovery or
23disclosure shall be heard.
24(2) A description of the type of records or information sought.
25(3) Affidavits showing good cause for the discovery or
26disclosure sought, setting forth the materiality thereof to the subject
27matter involved in the pending litigation and
stating upon
28reasonable belief that the governmental agency identified has the
29records or information from the records.
30(c) A hearing upon a motion for discovery or disclosure shall
31
not be held without full compliance with the notice provisions of
32this section except upon a showing by the moving party of good
33cause for noncompliance, or upon a waiver of the hearing by the
34governmental agency identified as having the records.
35(d) A party to a proceeding pending in a court or administrative
36agency is not required to seek records through alternate means
37before filing a motion pursuant to this section.
Section 1045 of the Evidence Code is amended to read:
(a) This article does not affect the right of access to
40records of complaints, or investigations of complaints, or discipline
P6 1imposed as a result of those investigations, concerning an event
2or transaction in which the peace officer or custodial officer, as
3defined in Section 831.5 of the Penal Code, participated, or which
4he or she perceived, and pertaining to the manner in which he or
5she performed his or her duties, provided that information is
6relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending litigation.
7(b) In determining relevance, the court shall examine the
8information in chambers in conformity with Section 915, and shall
9exclude
all of the following from disclosure:
10(1) Information consisting of complaints concerning conduct
11occurring more than five years before the event or transaction that
12is the subject of the litigation in aid of which discovery or
13disclosure is sought.
14(2) In any criminal proceeding the conclusions of any officer
15investigating a complaint filed pursuant to Section 832.5 of the
16Penal Code.
17(3) Facts sought to be disclosed that are so remote as to make
18disclosure of little or no practical benefit.
19(c) In determining relevance where the issue in litigation
20concerns the policies or pattern of conduct of the employing
21agency, the court shall consider whether the
information sought
22may be obtained from other records maintained by the employing
23agency in the regular course of agency business that would not
24necessitate the disclosure of individual personnel records.
25(d) Upon motion seasonably made by the governmental agency
26that has custody or control of the records to be examined or by the
27officer whose records are sought, and upon good cause showing
28the necessity thereof, the court may make any order that justice
29requires to protect the officer or agency from unnecessary
30annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression.
31(e) The court shall, in any case or proceeding permitting the
32disclosure or discovery of any peace officer or custodial officer
33records requested pursuant to Section 1043, order that the records
34disclosed or discovered may
not be used for any purpose other
35than a court proceeding pursuant to applicable law.
36(f) This article does not bar or limit access in any proceeding
37
to peace officer or custodial officer personnel records or records
38maintained pursuant to Section 832.5 of the Penal Code for which
39Sections 832.5 or 832.7 of the Penal Code do not prohibit
40disclosure.
Section 3304.5 of the Government Code is amended
2to read:
(a) An administrative appeal instituted by a public
4safety officer under this chapter shall be conducted in conformance
5with rules and procedures adopted by the local public agency.
6(b) Notwithstanding any confidentiality given to the personnel
7records of peace officers or custodial officers under this chapter
8or under the provisions governing regulation of peace officers
9contained in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of
Title
103 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, a municipality or local public agency
11that employs peace officers may hear and adjudicate an
12administrative appeal under this chapter, or the municipality or
13local public agency may empower a body to hear and adjudicate
14those appeals, in proceedings that are open to the public and in
15which some or all documents filed are available for public
16inspection.
Section 832.5 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
(a) (1) A department or agency in this state that
20employs peace officers shall establish a procedure to investigate
21complaints by members of the public against the personnel of these
22departments or agencies, and shall make a written description of
23the procedure available to the public.
24(2) A department or agency that employs custodial officers, as
25defined in Section 831.5, may establish a procedure to investigate
26complaints by members of the public against those custodial
27officers employed by these departments or agencies, provided
28however, that any procedure so established shall comply with the
29provisions of this section and with
the provisions of Section 832.7.
30(b) Complaints and any reports or findings relating to these
31complaints shall be retained for a period of at least five years. All
32complaints retained pursuant to this subdivision may be maintained
33either in the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s general personnel
34file or in a separate file designated by the department or agency
35as provided by department or agency policy, in accordance with
36all applicable requirements of law. However, prior to any official
37determination regarding promotion, transfer, or disciplinary action
38by an officer’s employing department or agency, the complaints
39described by subdivision (c) shall be removed from the officer’s
40general personnel file and placed inbegin insert aend insert separate file
designated by
P8 1the department or agency, in accordance with all applicable
2requirements of law.
3(c) Complaints by members of the public that are determined
4by the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s employing agency to
5be frivolous, as defined in Section 128.5 of the Code of Civil
6Procedure, or unfounded or exonerated, or any portion of a
7complaint that is determined to be frivolous, unfounded, or
8exonerated, shall not be maintained in that officer’s general
9personnel file. However, these complaints shall be retained in
10other, separate files that shall be deemed personnel records for
11purposes of the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5
12(commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the
13Government Code) and Section 1043 of the Evidence Code.
14(1) Management of the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s
15employing agency shall have access to the files described in this
16subdivision.
17(2) Management of the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s
18employing agency shall not use the complaints contained in these
19separate files for punitive or promotional purposes except as
20permitted by subdivision (f) of Section 3304 of the Government
21Code.
22(3) Management of the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s
23employing agency may identify any officer who is subject to the
24complaints maintained in these files that require counseling or
25additional training. However, if a complaint is removed from the
26officer’s personnel file, any reference in the personnel file to the
27complaint or to a separate file shall be deleted.
28(d) As used in this section and Section 832.7, the following
29definitions apply:
30(1) “Exonerated” means that the investigation clearly established
31that the actions of the peace officer or custodial officer that formed
32the basis for the complaint are not violations of law or department
33policy.
34(2) “General personnel file” means the file maintained by the
35agency containing the primary records specific to each peace
36officer’s or custodial officer’s employment, including evaluations,
37assignments, status changes, and imposed discipline.
38(3) “Sustained” means that the investigation disclosed sufficient
39evidence to prove, by a preponderance of evidence, the truth of
P9 1the
allegation in the complaint or that the actions of the peace
2officer or custodial officer violated law or department policy.
3(4) “Unfounded” means that the investigation clearly established
4that the allegation is not true.
5(e) (1) A municipality, county, or agency that employs peace
6officers may do both of the following:
7(A) Hold hearings to hear complaints by members of the public,
8consider evidence, and adjudicate the complaints or recommend
9adjudications.
10(B) Establish a body to hold the hearings described in
11subparagraph (A).
12(2) Notwithstanding any confidentiality given to the general
13personnel file or other personnel records of
peace officers or
14custodial officers, the hearings described in paragraph (1) may be
15open to the public.
Section 832.7 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
(a) Except as set forth in subdivision (c), peace officer
19or custodial officer personnel records and records maintained by
20any state or local agency pursuant to Section 832.5, or information
21obtained from these records, are confidential and shall not be
22disclosed in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery
23pursuant to Sections 1043 and 1046 of the Evidence Code.
24(b) (1) This section shall not apply to investigations or
25proceedings concerning the conduct of peace officers or custodial
26officers, or an agency or department that employs those officers,
27conducted by a grand jury, a district attorney’s office, the Attorney
28
General’s office, civilian review agencies, inspectors general,
29personnel boards, police commissions, civil service commissions,
30city councils, boards of supervisors, or any entities empowered to
31investigate peace officer misconduct on behalf of an agency,
32conduct audits of peace officer discipline on behalf of an agency,
33adjudicate complaints against peace officers or custodial officers,
34hear administrative appeals pursuant to Section 3304.5 of the
35Government Code, or set policies or funding for the law
36enforcement agency.
37(2) An entity allowed access to the personnel and complaint
38records of peace officers or custodial officers under this subdivision
39shall comply with the confidentiality provisions of this section.
P10 1(c) (1) Notwithstanding any other law,
all of the following
2peace officer or custodial officer personnel records and records
3maintained by any state or local agency pursuant to Section 832.5
4shall be available for public inspection pursuant to the California
5Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250)
6of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code):
7(A) A record related to the investigation or assessment of any
8use of force by a peace officer that is likely to or does cause death
9or serious bodily injury,begin delete includingend deletebegin insert including,end insert but not limited to,
10the discharge of a firearm, use of an electronic control weapon or
11conducted energy device, and any strike with an impact weapon
12to a person’s head.
13(B) A record related to any finding by a law enforcement agency
14or oversight agency that a peace officer or custodial officer engaged
15in sexual assault, an excessive use of force, an unjustified search,
16detention or arrest, racial or identity profiling, as defined in
17subdivision (e) of Section 13519.4, discrimination or unequal
18treatment on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age,
19religion, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, or mental
20or physical disability, or any other violation of the legal rights of
21a member of the public.
22(C) A record related to any finding by a law enforcement agency
23of job-related dishonesty by a peace officer or custodial officer,
24including, but not limited to, perjury, false statements, filing false
25reports, or destruction or
concealment of evidence.
26(2) Records that shall be released pursuant to this subdivision
27include, but are not limited to, the framing allegation or complaint,
28the agency’s full investigation file, any evidence gathered, and
29any findings or recommended findings, discipline, or corrective
30action taken.
31(3) A record disclosed pursuant to this section shall be redacted
32only to remove personal data or information, such as a home
33address, telephone number, or identities of family members, other
34than the names and work-related information of peacebegin insert officersend insert and
35custodial officers, to preserve the anonymity of complainants and
36witnesses, or to protect confidential medical, financial, or other
37information
in which disclosure would cause an unwarranted
38invasion of personal privacy that clearly outweighs the strong
39
public interest in records about misconduct by peace officers and
40custodial officers, or where there is a specific, particularized reason
P11 1to believe that disclosure of the record would pose a significant
2danger to the physical safety of the peace officer, custodial officer,
3or others.
4
(4) An agency may withhold a record that is disclosable
5pursuant to paragraph (1) during an investigation into the use of
6force until the peace officer’s employing agency determines
7whether the use of force violated a law or agency policy or until
8the district attorney with jurisdiction over the use of force
9determines whether to file criminal charges for the use of force,
10whichever is later, but shall not withhold a record that is
11disclosable pursuant to paragraph (1) for longer than 180 days
12from the date of the use of force.
13(d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (c), a department or
14agency shall release to the complaining party a copy of his or her
15own statements at the time the complaint is filed.
16(e) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (c), a department or
17agency that employs peace officers or custodial officers may
18disseminate data regarding the number, type, or disposition of
19complaints (sustained, not sustained, exonerated, or unfounded)
20made against its officers if that information is in a form which
21does not identify the individuals involved.
22(f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (c), a department or
23agency that employs peace officers or custodial officers may release
24factual information concerning a disciplinary investigation
if the
25officer who is the subject of the disciplinary investigation, or the
26officer’s agent or representative, publicly makes a statement he or
27she knows to be false concerning the investigation or the imposition
28of disciplinary action. Information may not be disclosed by the
29peace officer’s or custodial officer’s employer unless the false
30statement was published by an established medium of
31communication, such as television, radio, or a newspaper.
32Disclosure of factual information by the employing agency
33pursuant to this subdivision is limited to facts contained in the
34officer’s personnel file concerning the disciplinary investigation
35or imposition of disciplinary action that specifically refute the false
36statements made public by the peace officer or custodial officer
37or his or her agent or representative.
38(g) (1) The
department or agency shall provide written
39notification to the complaining party of the disposition of the
40complaint within 30 days of the disposition. The notification shall
P12 1include, at a minimum, the charges framed in response to the
2complaint, the agency’s disposition with respect to each of those
3charges, any factual findings on which the agency based its
4dispositions, and any discipline imposed or corrective action taken.
5(2) The notification described in this subdivision shall not be
6conclusive or binding or admissible as evidence in any separate
7or subsequent action or proceeding brought before an arbitrator,
8court, or judge of this state or the United States.
9(h) This section does not affect the discovery or disclosure of
10information contained in a peace officer’s or
custodial officer’s
11personnel file pursuant to Section 1043 of the Evidence Code.
The Legislature finds and declares that Section 6 of
14this act, which amends Section 832.7 of the Penal Code, furthers,
15within the meaning of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section
163 of Article I of the California Constitution, the purposes of that
17constitutional section as it relates to the right of public access to
18the meetings of local public bodies or the writings of local public
19officials and local agencies. Pursuant to paragraph (7) of
20subdivision (b) of Section 3 of Article I of the California
21Constitution, the
Legislature makes the following findings:
22The public has a strong, compelling interest in law enforcement
23transparency because it is essential to having a just and democratic
24society.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
27Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution for certain
28costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district
29because, in that regard, this act creates a legislative mandate that
30is within the scope of paragraph (7) of subdivision (b) of Section
313 of Article I of the California Constitution.
32However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that
33this act contains other costs mandated by the
state, reimbursement
34to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
35pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
364 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
98