Senate BillNo. 1320


Introduced by Senator Runner

(Coauthors: Senators Anderson, Bates, Fuller, Gaines, Huff, Moorlach, Stone, and Vidak)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bigelow, Brough, Chang, Gallagher, and Lackey)

February 19, 2016


An act to amend Sections 13975, 14500, and 14526.5 of, and to repeal Section 14534.1 of, the Government Code, relating to transportation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1320, as introduced, Runner. California Transportation Commission.

(1) Existing law establishes in state government the Transportation Agency, which includes various departments and state entities, including the California Transportation Commission. Existing law vests the California Transportation Commission with specified powers, duties, and functions relative to transportation matters. Existing law requires the commission to retain independent authority to perform the duties and functions prescribed to it under any provision of law.

This bill would exclude the California Transportation Commission from the Transportation Agency, establish it as an entity in state government, and require it to act in an independent oversight role. The bill would also make conforming changes.

(2) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to prepare a state highway operation and protection program every other year for the expenditure of transportation capital improvement funds for projects that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system, excluding projects that add new traffic lanes. The program is required to be based on an asset management plan, as specified. Existing law requires the department to specify, for each project in the program, the capital and support budget and projected delivery date for various components of the project. Existing law provides for the California Transportation Commission to review and adopt the program, and authorizes the commission to decline to adopt the program if it determines that the program is not sufficiently consistent with the asset management plan.

This bill would additionally require the department to program capital outlay support resources for each project in the program. The bill would provide that the commission is not required to approve the program in its entirety, as submitted by the department, and may approve or reject individual projects programmed by the department. The bill would require the department to submit any change in a programmed project’s cost, scope, or schedule to the commission for its approval.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) Over the next 10 years, the state faces a $59 billion shortfall
4to adequately maintain the state highway system in a basic state
5of good repair.

6(b) The 21st Annual Highway Report by the Reason Foundation,
7published in September 2014, found the following:

8(1) California has 50,462 lane miles of highways under the
9administration of the Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

10(2) Overall, California spent $501,136 per state mile of highway,
11more than three times the national average, yet California’s state
12highway system ranks 45th in overall performance and cost
13effectiveness.

14(3) California spent $102,889 per state mile of highway
15specifically on maintenance, nearly four times the national average.

16(4) California spent $48,754 per state mile of highway
17specifically on administration, more than four times the national
18average.

19(c) The Legislative Analyst’s Office recommended, in the
20Capital Outlay Support Program Review report issued in May
212014, that Caltrans should be held accountable for the delivery of
P3    1State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP)
2projects by requiring the California Transportation Commission,
3acting in an independent oversight role, to review and approve
4individual SHOPP projects, allocate Capital Outlay Support
5Program funds for SHOPP, and report on Caltrans’ project delivery
6performance and Caltrans should also be required to provide
7necessary project information for SHOPP projects to the California
8Transportation Commission.

9

SEC. 2.  

Section 13975 of the Government Code is amended
10to read:

11

13975.  

There is in the state government the Transportation
12Agency. The agency consists of the Department of the California
13Highway Patrol, thebegin delete California Transportation Commission, theend delete
14 Department of Motor Vehicles, the Department of Transportation,
15the High-Speed Rail Authority, and the Board of Pilot
16Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and
17Suisun.

18

SEC. 3.  

Section 14500 of the Government Code is amended
19to read:

20

14500.  

There is inbegin delete the Transportation Agencyend deletebegin insert state governmentend insert
21 a California Transportation Commission.begin insert The commission shall
22act in an independent oversight role.end insert

23

SEC. 4.  

Section 14526.5 of the Government Code is amended
24to read:

25

14526.5.  

(a) Based on the asset management plan prepared
26and approved pursuant to Section 14526.4, the department shall
27begin delete prepareend deletebegin insert prepare, for review by the commission,end insert a state highway
28operation and protection program for the expenditure of
29transportation funds for major capital improvements that are
30necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system. Projects
31included in the program shall be limited to capital improvements
32relative to maintenance, safety, and rehabilitation of state highways
33and bridges that do not add a new traffic lane to the system.begin insert As
34part of the programming process, the department shall program
35capital outlay support resources for each project in the program.end insert

36(b) The program shall include projects that are expected to be
37advertised prior to July 1 of the year following submission of the
38program, but which have not yet been funded. The program shall
39include those projects for which construction is to begin within
P4    1four fiscal years, starting July 1 of the year following the year the
2program is submitted.

3(c) The department, at a minimum, shall specify, for each project
4in the state highway operation and protection program, the capital
5and support budget, as well as a projected delivery date, for each
6of the following project components:

7(1) Completion of project approval and environmental
8documents.

9(2) Preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates.

10(3) Acquisition of rights-of-way, including, but not limited to,
11support activities.

12(4) Start of construction.

13(d) Thebegin delete programend deletebegin insert departmentend insert shallbegin delete be submittedend deletebegin insert submit its
14proposed programend insert
to the commission not later than January 31 of
15each even-numbered year. Prior to submittingbegin delete the plan, theend deletebegin insert its
16proposed program, theend insert
department shall make a draft of its
17proposed program available to transportation planning agencies
18for review and comment and shall include the comments in its
19submittal to the commission.begin insert end insertbegin insertThe department shall provide the
20commission with detailed information for all programmed projects,
21including, but not limited to, cost, scope, and schedule.end insert

22(e) The commissionbegin delete mayend deletebegin insert shallend insert review thebegin insert proposedend insert program
23relative to its overall adequacy, consistency with the asset
24management plan prepared and approved pursuant to Section
2514526.4 and funding priorities established in Section 167 of the
26Streets and Highways Code, the level of annual funding needed
27to implement the program, and the impact of those expenditures
28on the state transportation improvement program. The commission
29shall adopt the program and submit it to the Legislature and the
30Governor not later than April 1 of each even-numbered year. The
31commissionbegin delete may decline to adopt the program if the commission
32determines that the program is not sufficiently consistent with the
33asset management plan prepared and approved pursuant to Section
3414526.4.end delete
begin insert end insertbegin insertis not required to approve the program in its entirety, as
35submitted by the department, and may approve or reject individual
36projects programmed by the department. The commission shall
37adopt a program of approved projects and submit it to the
38Legislature and the Governor not later than April 1 of each
39even-numbered year.end insert

P5    1(f) Expenditures for these projects shall not be subject to
2Sections 188 and 188.8 of the Streets and Highways Code.

begin insert

3(g) Following adoption of the state highway operation and
4protection program by the commission, any change in a
5programmed project’s cost, scope, or schedule shall be submitted
6by the department to the commission for its approval before the
7changes may be implemented.

end insert
8

SEC. 5.  

Section 14534.1 of the Government Code is repealed.

begin delete
9

14534.1.  

Notwithstanding Section 12850.6 or subdivision (b)
10of Section 12800, as added to this code by the Governor’s
11Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 2012 during the 2011-12 Regular
12Session, the commission shall retain independent authority to
13perform those duties and functions prescribed to it under any
14provision of law.

end delete


O

    99