BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          1333 (Block)


          As Amended  August 17, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  28-11


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                   |Noes               |
          |                |     |                       |                   |
          |                |     |                       |                   |
          |                |     |                       |                   |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+-------------------|
          |Water           |9-5  |Levine, Dodd, Eggman,  |Gallagher,         |
          |                |     |                       |Bigelow, Harper,   |
          |                |     |                       |Olsen, Salas       |
          |                |     |Cristina Garcia,       |                   |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia, Gomez, |                   |
          |                |     |Lopez, Nazarian,       |                   |
          |                |     |Williams               |                   |
          |                |     |                       |                   |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+-------------------|
          |Appropriations  |11-4 |Gonzalez, Bloom,       |Bigelow, Chang,    |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Bonta,        |Jones, Obernolte   |
          |                |     |Eggman, Eduardo        |                   |
          |                |     |Garcia, Quirk,         |                   |
          |                |     |Santiago, Weber, Wood, |                   |
          |                |     |McCarty                |                   |
          |                |     |                       |                   |
          |                |     |                       |                   |








                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  2





           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Prohibits smoking, or disposing of used cigarette  
          waste, on a state beach or in a state park.  Specifically, this  
          bill:  


          1)Prohibits a person from smoking on a state coastal beach or in  
            a unit of the state park system.  The prohibition applies to  
            cigars or cigarettes containing tobacco or any other weed or  
            plant used as an alternative or supplement to tobacco or  
            nicotine, and also includes electronic and vapor cigarettes.


          2)Prohibits a person from disposing of used cigar or cigarette  
            waste on a state coastal beach or in a state park unit.


          3)Makes a violation of this bill an infraction, punishable by a  
            fine of up to $250.


          4)Requires the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to post  
            signs providing notice of the smoking prohibition.  Provides  
            that the smoking prohibition shall be enforced on state  
            coastal beaches and in state park units only after signs have  
            been posted.


          5)Exempts from the prohibition any use of a cigar, cigarette, or  
            pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product  
            used as a prop in a motion picture, television program, or  
            similar filmed audiovisual work, provided filming is properly  
            permitted by the California Film Commission, the active film  
            set is closed to the general public, and any waste is removed  
            from the beach or park.










                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  3





          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Makes it an infraction to smoke a cigarette, cigar or other  
            tobacco-related product within 25 feet of a playground or  
            sandbox, punishable by a fine of $250 per incident.


          2)Prohibits smoking inside a public building, in a state-owned  
            vehicle, or in an outdoor area within 20 feet of a main  
            entrance, exit or window.


          3)Allows cities, counties and colleges to adopt more restrictive  
            ordinances prohibiting smoking.


          4)Requires the DPR to administer and protect state park  
            properties for the use and enjoyment of the public.  Prohibits  
            smoking in state parks upon a finding of extreme fire hazard  
            by the DPR, except as allowed in designated areas. Allows the  
            DPR to prohibit smoking in certain locations or under certain  
            conditions, such as on specific guided walks, buildings,  
            trails, and when fire danger is high.   


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, increased one-time costs estimated to be between  
          $840,000 and $1.1 million (General Fund) for the purchase and  
          installation of signage.  The DPR estimates each sign will cost  
          between $150 and $200. The smoking ban would apply to 280 state  
          parks, with an estimated 20 signs per park.  This estimate does  
          not include any additional costs associated with CEQA or Coastal  
          Commission permits, if determined to be applicable.


          COMMENTS:  This bill prohibits smoking on state beaches or in  
          any state park units.  The author has introduced this bill to  
          protect the public, state lands and wildlife from the dangers of  








                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  4





          cigarette litter and second hand smoke by banning smoking in all  
          state parks and state beaches.  The author emphasizes that  
          cigarette waste is detrimental to California's environment,  
          particularly its beaches and parks.  Studies show that cigarette  
          butts are the number one waste item found in these locations.   
          Cigarettes are non-biodegradable and contain over 164 toxic  
          chemicals.  Toxic chemicals from cigarette butts have also been  
          found to leak into the aquatic environment when they are  
          submerged in water.  Cigarette debris has been found in the  
          stomachs of birds, fish and other marine animals.  This trash  
          also poses a fire hazard to state lands that are already  
          susceptible to wildfires due to dry conditions.


          According to data compiled by the Ocean Conservancy from coastal  
          clean-up collection efforts nationwide, cigarette litter  
          continues to be the most commonly found waste item on beaches.   
          In 2015 over 2 million pieces of cigarette litter were retrieved  
          from United States (U.S.) beaches.  Cigarette butts have been  
          the most common type of trash found during coastal cleanup days  
          for the past 30 years.  Cigarette litter has been found in the  
          stomachs of fish, birds, whales and other marine animals who  
          mistake them for food.  Cigarette filters also contain cellulose  
          acetate, a type of plastic that breaks down slowly and never  
          fully decomposes.  In addition to the litter problems with  
          cigarettes, smoking poses forest fire hazards and was the cause  
          of four of the 25 worst wildfires in California between 1929 and  
          1999, costing the state billions of dollars.


          In addition to the litter problems and fire hazards created by  
          smoking, the author notes the hazards of second hand smoke.   
          Tobacco smoking causes an estimated 443,000 deaths per year, of  
          which 73,000 are nonsmokers, according to data provided by the  
          Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  The U.S. Surgeon  
          General has concluded there is no risk-free level of exposure to  
          second hand smoke, and the California Air Resources Board has  
          categorized second hand smoke as a toxic air contaminant.









                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  5






          Other studies have found that the non-biodegradable plastic in  
          cigarette butt filters can be toxic when consumed by marine  
          wildlife.  Toxic chemicals leached from discarded cigarette  
          butts have also been found to present a biohazard to water  
          fleas, which play an important role in aquatic ecosystems by  
          transferring energy and organic matter from primary producers  
          such as algae to higher consumers such as fish.  The Ocean  
          Protection Council's Implementation Strategy on Marine Debris  
          recommends that smoking be prohibited on state beaches.


          Supporters of this bill emphasize that according to the U.S.  
          Surgeon General, there is no risk-free level of exposure to  
          secondhand smoke.  Children and the elderly are particularly  
          vulnerable to the effects of secondhand smoke.  Other supporters  
          emphasize the harm to the environment from cigarette waste, as  
          well as the fire-risk of smoking in state parks.




          Opponents of this bill argue that this bill is unnecessary  
          because state law already provides fines for littering public  
          property, including beaches.  The DPR also has the authority to  
          impose restrictions on smoking when fire risk is high, and has  
          restricted smoking in other specific situations and locations.   
          The opponents also assert that rules on outdoor smoking should  
          be addressed at the local level rather than statewide.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Diane Colborn / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096     
                                                                  FN:  
          0004047












                                                                    SB 1333


                                                                    Page  6