BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  1





          SENATE THIRD READING


          SB  
          1335 (Mitchell)


          As Amended  August 18, 2016


          Majority vote


          SENATE VOTE:  39-0


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                   |Noes                 |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Health          |17-0 |Wood, Maienschein,     |                     |
          |                |     |Bonilla, Burke,        |                     |
          |                |     |Campos, Chiu, Gomez,   |                     |
          |                |     |Roger Hernández,       |                     |
          |                |     |Lackey, Nazarian,      |                     |
          |                |     |Patterson,             |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |Ridley-Thomas,         |                     |
          |                |     |Rodriguez, Santiago,   |                     |
          |                |     |Steinorth, Thurmond,   |                     |
          |                |     |Waldron                |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow,     |                     |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, |                     |
          |                |     |Calderon, Chang, Daly, |                     |








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Eggman, Gallagher,     |                     |
          |                |     |Eduardo Garcia,        |                     |
          |                |     |Holden, Jones,         |                     |
          |                |     |Obernolte, Quirk,      |                     |
          |                |     |Santiago, Wagner,      |                     |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood, McCarty   |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
          |                |     |                       |                     |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Authorizes federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)  
          and rural health clinics (RHCs) to provide Drug Medi-Cal (DMC)  
          services and be reimbursed for such services.  Specifically,  
          this bill:  


          1)Permits an FQHC or RHC to elect to enroll as a DMC certified  
            provider and provides that the costs associated with the DMC  
            services shall not be included in the FQHC's or RHC's per  
            visit prospective payment system (PPS) rate and reimbursement  
            for those services is as follows: 


             a)   If the FQHC or RHC elects to provide DMC services in a  
               county that has elected to participate in the DMC organized  
               delivery system, the FQHC or RHC shall receive  
               reimbursement pursuant to a mutually agreed upon contract  
               between the county and the FQHC or RHC; and, 


             b)   If the FQHC or RHC elects to provide DMC services in a  
               county that does not elect to participate in the DMC  
               organized delivery system, the FQHC or RHC shall receive  
               reimbursement pursuant to a mutually agreed upon contract  
               between the county and the FQHC or RHC.  If the county  
               refuses to contract with the FQHC or RHC, the FQHC or RHC  
               may request to contract directly with the Department of  
               Health Care Services (DHCS) and shall be reimbursed for  








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  3





               those services at the fee-for-service (FFS) rate.


          2)Provides that if an FQHC or RHC elects reimbursement for DMC  
            services, pursuant to which the costs associated with  
            providing the services are part of the FQHC's or RHC's clinic  
            base rate, those costs must be adjusted out of the FQHC's or  
            RHC's clinic base rate as scope-of-service changes, as  
            specified.


          3)Indicates that if an FQHC or RHC that reverses its election  
            under 1) above, then the FQHC or RHC must revert to its prior  
            rate, subject to an increase to account for all Medicare  
            Economic Index increases or decreases associated with  
            applicable scope-of-service adjustments, as specified.


          4)Requires an FQHC or RHC to submit a scope-of-service rate  
            change request within 90 days of the beginning of any FQHC or  
            RHC fiscal year occurring after January 1, 2017, if, during  
            the FQHC's or RHC's prior fiscal year, both of the following  
            occurred:


             a)   The FQHC or RHC elected reimbursement under 1) above;


             b)   The costs of providing DMC services were included in the  
               per-visit PPS rate and the removal of those costs would  
               have resulted in a significantly lower per-visit PPS rate.   
               Specifies that "significantly lower" means an average  
               per-visit PPS rate decrease in excess of 2.5%.


          5)Requires, within 90 days of receipt of the request for a  
            scope-of-service change, the DHCS to issue the FQHC or RHC an  
            interim rate equal to 90% of the FQHC's or RHC's projected  
            allowable cost as determined by DHCS.  Requires the audit for  








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  4





            the final rate to comply with existing requirements.


          6)Provides that if an FQHC or RHC elects to enroll as a DMC  
            provider under 1) above, and a scope-of-service change is  
            necessary, as specified, the FQHC or RHC must comply with both  
            of the following:


             a)   After DHCS approves the request for a scope-of-service  
               change and adjusts the per-visit PPS rate, the FQHC or RHC  
               shall not bill the per-visit PPS rate for services  
               reimbursed by the DMC organized delivery system; and, 


             b)   For the purpose of calculating a per-visit PPS rate, the  
               FQHC or RHC shall provide verifiable documentation of the  
               costs of an employee who provides both FQHC services and  
               DMC services.  Documentation shall attribute costs  
               proportionally between FQHC services and DMC services.   
               Only the costs attributable to FQHC services shall be  
               included in the per-visit PPS rate.


          7)Specifies that if an FQHC or RHC was enrolled as a DMC  
            certified provider on or before January 1, 2017, the FQHC or  
            RHC may continue to provide, and be reimbursed for, DMC  
            services pursuant to the terms of the contract if the costs of  
            providing DMC services are reimbursed outside of the per-visit  
            PPS rate, as specified.


          8)Provides that if an FQHC or RHC entered into a contract on or  
            before January 1, 2017, with a mental health plan to provide  
            specialty mental health services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries as  
            part of the mental health plan's network, the FQHC or RHC may  
            continue to provide, and be reimbursed for, those specialty  
            mental health services pursuant to the terms of the contract  
            with the mental health plan if the costs of providing  








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  5





            specialty mental health services are reimbursed outside of the  
            per visit the PPS rate, as specified.


          9)Defines mental health plan as any mental health plan  
            contracting with DHCS to provide specialty mental health  
            services to enrolled Medi-Cal beneficiaries, as specified.


          10)Makes other technical and conforming changes, including  
            chaptering out amendments.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to Assembly Appropriations Committee:


          1)Minor one-time costs for revising regulations and seeking any  
            necessary federal approvals to allow the payment procedures  
            authorized under the bill (General Fund (GF)/federal).


          2)Unknown, potentially significant costs for DHCS to conduct  
            provider enrollment activities, contract directly with  
            clinics, and to recalculate the PPS rate for clinics that wish  
            to carve out costs associated with DMC services or contract  
            directly with the department (GF/federal). The bill requires  
            that if clinics elect to contract directly for DMC services,  
            and costs associated with providing the services are part of  
            the clinic's base PPS rate, the costs must be adjusted out of  
            the clinic's base rate as a "scope-of-service change."  In  
            addition, current law requires DHCS to enroll providers and  
            provides for state direct contracting in certain situations.


            Recalculating a PPS rate requires a detailed review of  
            utilization and expenditures by clinics.  For example,  
            assuming the cost per review is about $10,000 and 30 clinics  
            seek a recalculation, the administrative costs to DHCS would  
            be about $300,000, plus costs for provider enrollment and  








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  6





            related activities (GF/federal).  It is unclear how many  
            clinics currently contract for DMC services, or who would  
            elect to contract and apply for a scope-of-service change to  
            ensure DMC services are carved out of the PPS rate.

          3)Although clarification that clinics can contract with counties  
            for DMC services may improve access, no significant increase  
            in utilization or costs for services is assumed to be directly  
            attributable to this bill.

          COMMENTS:  According to the author, as the growing need for  
          behavioral health care services continues to go unmet, barriers  
          that impair the ability of community clinics and health centers  
          to participate as providers in the DMC and as providers  
          contracted with county specialty mental health plans (MHPs)  
          should be eliminated.  This bill will help community clinics  
          more easily provide substance use disorder treatment and  
          medically necessary specialty mental health services to our most  
          vulnerable communities by allowing FQHCs and RHCs to elect  
          reimbursement on a FFS basis instead of the PPS basis, thereby  
          expanding the services offered and provider types available at  
          FQHCs and RHCs.

          Reimbursement to FQHCs and RHCs is governed by state and federal  
          law.  FQHCs and RHCs are reimbursed by Medi-Cal on a per-visit  
          rate which is known as the PPS.  For Medi-Cal managed care plan  
          patients, DHCS reimburses FQHCs and RHCs for the difference  
          between its per-visit PPS rate and the payment made by the plan.  
           This payment is known as a "wrap around" payment.  The Medi-Cal  
          managed care wrap-around rate was established to reimburse  
          providers for the difference between their PPS rate and their  
          Medi-Cal managed care reimbursement rate.



          The Medi-Cal Specialty Mental Health Services Program and DMC  
          are "carved-out" of the broader Medi-Cal program, are  
          administered by DHCS, and operated under federal waivers  
          approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.   








                                                                    SB 1335


                                                                    Page  7





          DHCS contracts with a MHP in each county to provide or arrange  
          for the provision of Medi-Cal specialty mental health services.   
          Under the terms of the specialty mental health waiver and state  
          regulation, FQHC services are not covered by county mental  
          health plans.



          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Rosielyn Pulmano / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097  FN:  
          0004540