Amended in Senate April 12, 2016

Senate BillNo. 1342


Introduced by Senator Mendoza

February 19, 2016


An act to add Sectionbegin delete 1176.5 to the Labor Code,end deletebegin insert 53060.4 to the Government Code,end insert relating to wages.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 1342, as amended, Mendoza. Wages: investigations: subpoenas.

Existing law authorizes the Industrial Welfare Commission to subpoena witnesses. Existing law provides that if a person fails to comply with an order or subpoena of the commission or a witness refuses to testify to any matter regarding which he or she may lawfully be interrogated before any wage board or the commission, it shall be the duty of the superior court to compel obedience in a manner by which such obedience could be compelled in a proceeding pending before the court.

This bill wouldbegin delete authorize a board of supervisors of a county orend deletebegin insert specify thatend insert a legislative body of a citybegin insert or county is authorizedend insert to delegate thatbegin delete board orend delete body’s authority to issuebegin delete subpoenas, by resolution or ordinance,end deletebegin insert subpoenaend insertbegin inserts and to report noncompliance thereof to the judge of the superior court of the county,end insert to a county or citybegin delete officerend deletebegin insert officialend insert or department headbegin delete for the purpose of conducting investigationsend deletebegin insert in orderend insert to enforce local wage laws.begin delete The bill would require these subpoenas to only be issued for purposes of obtaining records and testimony reasonably necessary to determine if a local wage ordinance was violated, to be reviewed by the county counsel or city attorney, and signed by the designated officer or department head before it is issued. The bill would provide that if any person so duly subpoenaed to appear and give evidence or to produce any books or papers before the designated officer or department head, neglects or refused to appear, or to produce any books or papers, as required by the subpoena, or refuses to testify or answer any questions that the designated officer or department head decides are proper and pertinent, he or she shall be in contempt, and the designated officer or department head shall report that fact to the judge of the superior court of the county.end deletebegin insert The bill would provide legislative findings in support of this provision.end insert

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(1) Wage theft is prevalent among immigrant and low-wage
4workers in California.

5(2) Los Angeles County, where approximately $26.6 million in
6wagesbegin delete areend deletebegin insert isend insert stolen from laborers every week, has been dubbed by
7some as the “wage theft capital” of the United States.

8(3) The Economic Roundtable and the University of California,
9Los Angeles, indicate that violations of wage laws in Los Angeles
10are pervasive, with 30 percent of low-wage workers in Los Angeles
11receiving less than the minimum wage and 88.5 percent of workers
12experiencing some sort of wage theft.

13(4) Wage theft can cause workers extreme financial hardship,
14making it harder for workers experiencing wage theft to take care
15of their families and contribute to the state economy.

16(5) According to the Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission
17on California State Government Organization and Economy, wage
18enforcement resources in California have not kept pace with
19increases in the number of employers and increased complexity
20of the employer-employee relationship. Local jurisdictions,
21including the City and County of San Francisco, the City of Los
22Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles, have addressed the need
23for additional wage enforcement resources by establishing local
24wage enforcement agencies.

25(6) In California, 14 local jurisdictions have enacted minimum
26wage ordinances. The majority of these jurisdictions have
P3    1designated or createdbegin delete a local agencyend deletebegin insert local agenciesend insert to enforce local
2wage laws.

3(7) Local wage enforcement is an effective means of combating
4wage theft. For example, San Francisco’s Office of Labor Standards
5Enforcement recovered 90.5 percent of wages and interest owed
6to workers between 2003 and 2013.

begin insert

7
(8) Pursuant to Sections 25207, 27721, and 37104, and Dibb
8v. County of San Diego, (8 Cal. 4th 1200), cities and counties are
9authorized to delegate to local officials the authority to issue
10subpoenas in support of enforcing local wage ordinances.

end insert

11(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this measure to
12promote honest pay for fair work by giving local wage enforcement
13programs all of the tools necessary to conduct successful wage
14claim investigations in order to recover unpaid back wages for
15begin delete hard workingend deletebegin insert hardworkingend insert Californians.

begin insert

16
(c) Cities and counties are encouraged to develop and enact
17specific measures to target and remedy wage theft.

end insert
begin delete
18

SEC. 2.  

Section 1176.5 is added to the Labor Code, to read:

19

1176.5.  

(a) (1) The board of supervisors of a county may
20delegate the board’s authority to issue subpoenas, by resolution
21or ordinance, to a county officer or department head for the purpose
22of conducting investigations to enforce local wage laws.

23(2) The subpoena shall only be for purposes of obtaining records
24and testimony reasonably necessary to determine if a local wage
25ordinance was violated. The subpoena shall be reviewed by the
26county counsel and signed by the designated county officer or
27department head before it is issued. The subpoena shall be served
28in the same manner as subpoenas are served in civil actions.

29(3) If a county and a city contract for purposes of the county
30conducting investigations to enforce local wage laws within the
31boundaries of a city, that contract may provide a county officer or
32department head with the authority to issue subpoenas within the
33contracting city’s boundaries with the same force and effect as if
34issued in unincorporated areas of that county. A subpoena issued
35pursuant to this subdivision shall be reviewed by the county counsel
36before being issued.

37(b) (1) The legislative body of a city may delegate that body’s
38authority to issue subpoenas, by resolution or ordinance, to a county
39officer or department head for the purpose of conducting
40investigations to enforce local wage laws.

P4    1(2) The subpoena shall only be for purposes of obtaining records
2and testimony reasonably necessary to determine if a local wage
3ordinance was violated. The subpoena shall be reviewed by the
4city attorney and signed by the designated city officer or
5department head before it is issued. The subpoena shall be served
6in the same manner as subpoenas are served in civil actions.

7(3) If a county and a city contract for purposes of the city
8conducting investigations to enforce local wage laws within the
9unincorporated areas of the county, that contract may provide a
10city officer or department head with the authority to issue
11subpoenas within the contracting county’s unincorporated areas
12with the same force and effect as if issued within the city’s
13boundaries. A subpoena issued pursuant to this subdivision shall
14be reviewed by the city attorney before being issued.

15(c) If any person duly subpoenaed pursuant to this section to
16appear and give evidence or to produce any books or papers before
17the designated officer or department head, neglects or refused to
18appear, or to produce any books or papers, as required by the
19subpoena, or refuses to testify or answer any questions that the
20designated officer or department head decides are proper and
21pertinent, he or she shall be in contempt, and the designated officer
22or department head shall report the that fact to the judge of the
23superior court of the county.

end delete
24begin insert

begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

end insert

begin insertSection 53060.4 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert, to
25read:end insert

begin insert
26

begin insert53060.4.end insert  

(a) The legislative body of a city or county may
27delegate to a county or city official or department head its authority
28to issue subpoenas and to report noncompliance thereof to the
29judge of the superior court of the county, in order to enforce local
30wage laws.

31
(b) The Legislature finds and declares that these provisions do
32not constitute a change in, but are declaratory of, existing law.

end insert


O

    98