BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER
                             Senator Fran Pavley, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

          Bill No:            SB 1347         Hearing Date:    April 12,  
          2016
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Author:    |Nielsen                |           |                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Version:   |February 19, 2016    Introduced                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Urgency:   |No                     |Fiscal:    |Yes              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant:|Matthew Dumlao                                       |
          |           |                                                     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
                    Subject:  Fire prevention fee: administration


          BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
          
          In July 2011, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed  
          Assembly Bill X1 29 that established the State Responsibility  
          Area (SRA) fire prevention fee.  A SRA is defined as an area of  
          the state in which the financial responsibility of preventing  
          and suppressing fires primarily rests with the state. The fee is  
          used to pay for fire prevention services within the SRA. The fee  
          is applied to all habitable structures within the SRA and  
          generates on average $74 million per year.  

          Effective July 1, 2014, the fee is levied at the rate of $152.33  
          per habitable structure, which is defined as a building that can  
          be occupied for residential use. Owners of habitable structure  
          who are also within the boundaries of a local fire protection  
          agency will receive a reduction of $35 per habitable structure.  
          Just over 98% of all fee payers throughout the state receive  
          this fee reduction.

          According to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection  
          (CDF), the fire prevention fee funds a variety of important fire  
          prevention services in the SRA. Such activities include fuel  
          reduction projects that lessen the risk of wildfire to  
          communities, evacuation routes, and infrastructure.  Other  
          activities include defensible space inspections, fire prevention  
          engineering, emergency evacuation planning, fire prevention  







          SB 1347 (Nielsen)                                       Page 2  
          of ?
          
          
          education, fire hazard severity mapping, implementation of the  
          State and local Fire Plans, and fire-related law enforcement  
          activities such as arson investigation. 

          An annual report on SRA fire fee expenditures is required by  
          law. The sunset date on these reports is January 31, 2017. In a  
          recent informational report from last year, CDF summarized  
          expenditures for the three fiscal years 2012-15. That report is  
          available on the CDF website. For the most recent year, total  
          expenditures for fire prevention activities were $76.9 million  
          and total administrative costs were $16.0 million. Approximately  
          20% of total expenditures went toward paying administrative  
          costs.

          Administrative costs fall under two categories: (1) costs  
          associated with collecting the fee and (2) costs associated with  
          administering the fire prevention programs.  The State Board of  
          Equalization is tasked with collecting the fee and dispersing  
          refunds to property owners who successfully dispute a claim that  
          he/she must pay the fee.  CDF is responsible for carrying out  
          the fire prevention services in the SRA.

          The legality of the fee is being challenged in court, and it is  
          not clear when the trial will occur. The argument is that the  
          fee should have been enacted as a tax and, therefore, subject to  
          a 2/3 vote.

          Since its adoption, the Legislature has considered many bills to  
          repeal the fee, none of which were passed. It also passed bills  
          allowing a landowner to apportion the fee with a prospective  
          buyer, to index the fee for inflation, and to exempt structures  
          destroyed by natural disasters from the fee.

          Some legislators were concerned that they (and the public) were  
          not getting adequate information about SRA fire fee expenditures  
          despite this report and other information provided to them by  
          CDF.  


          PROPOSED LAW
          
          This bill would limit the total costs of administering the SRA  
          fire prevention fee to no more than 5% of the total money  
          collected by the SRA fee. The administrative costs consist of  








          SB 1347 (Nielsen)                                       Page 3  
          of ?
          
          
          the costs incurred by the State Board of Equalization in  
          collecting the fee as well as the costs to CDF for implementing  
          the fire prevention activities.
           
          This bill extends the sunset on the requirement to submit an  
          annual report until January 31, 2022.


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
          The author of the bill argues that the current administrative  
          costs are too high, and the money spent on administrative costs  
          would be better served directly providing fire prevention  
          benefits to the payers of the fee. Also, the author states the  
          sunset should be extended "so that the Legislature may continue  
          receiving this valuable information for a least five additional  
          years."

          According to the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA), "SB  
          1347 would cap the annual administrative costs of the fire  
          prevention fee at five percent. Today administrative costs are  
          roughly 20 percent.  This issue is currently the subject of  
          litigation advanced by the HJTA that attempts to show that this  
          fee is in fact a tax that should have required a two-thirds vote  
          of the Legislature.  While this lawsuit continues to work its  
          way through the court, and the fee continues to be collected,  
          this Legislature owes it to taxpayers to ensure that the revenue  
          raised is spent in the most prudent way possible."


          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION
          None received.

          COMMENTS
          
           SB 1347 calls for a seventy five percent reduction in  
          administrative costs.  This bill makes an implicit assumption  
          that reducing administrative costs will free up more money to be  
          spent directly on fire prevention projects. However, the  
          magnitude of the reduction in administrative costs might  
          actually result in less fee money collected and fewer fire  
          prevention projects. If extra money from the General Fund is not  
          available to CDF to conduct fire prevention projects, the risk  
          of fires will increase.
           








          SB 1347 (Nielsen)                                       Page 4  
          of ?
          
          
          Related legislation. 
           AB 2035 (Bigelow): This bill would add local government entities  
          to the list of potential recipients of SRA fire prevention fund  
          money, as long as they reach an agreement with the board and  
          they conduct fire prevention activities in a state  
          responsibility area.  
           
          SB 1136 (Morrell): This bill extends the sunset for submitting  
          an annual report until January 31, 2021. It also increases the  
          level of detail required in the report, including reporting on  
          equipment expenditures and personnel positions for each program  
          and subprogram paid for by fire prevention fees.  
          
          SB 1293 (Tom Berryhill): This bill makes a minor, nonsubstantive  
          change.


          SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 
          None.

          SUPPORT
          California Fire Chiefs Association
          Fire Districts Association of California
          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

          OPPOSITION
          None received.
          

                                      -- END --