BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 1359
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB
1359 (Block)
As Amended August 1, 2016
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE: 39-0
------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Higher |13-0 |Medina, Baker, Bloom, | |
|Education | |Chávez, Irwin, | |
| | |Jones-Sawyer, Levine, | |
| | |Linder, Low, Olsen, | |
| | |Santiago, Weber, | |
| | |Williams | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Appropriations |20-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow, | |
| | |Bloom, Bonilla, | |
| | |Bonta, Calderon, | |
| | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | |
| | |Gallagher, Eduardo | |
| | |Garcia, Holden, | |
| | |Jones, Obernolte, | |
| | |Quirk, Santiago, | |
| | |Wagner, Weber, Wood, | |
SB 1359
Page 2
| | |McCarty | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Requires, effective January 1, 2018, each campus of
the California Community Colleges (CCC) and the California State
University (CSU), and requests, effective January 1, 2018, each
campus of the University of California (UC), to clearly
highlight the courses that use digital course materials that are
free of charge and have a low-cost option for printed versions.
Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires each campus of the CCC and the CSU, and requests each
campus of the UC, to do both of the following:
a) Clearly highlight, in a way that may include the use of
a symbol or logo, in a conspicuous place on the online
campus course schedule, the courses that exclusively use
digital course materials that are free of charge to
students and may have a low-cost option for print versions;
and,
b) Clearly communicate to students that the course
materials used for the courses identified, as specified,
are free of charge and therefore not required to be
purchased.
2)Specifies that course materials, as specified, may include
open educational resources (OERs), institutionally licensed
campus library materials that all students enrolled in the
course have access to use, and other properly licensed and
adopted materials; and, each campus of the CSU and each
participating campus of the UC, and each CCC district shall
SB 1359
Page 3
ensure that the materials comply with the federal Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the federal Copyright Act of
1976.
3)Defines the following terms:
a) "Course schedule" is a collection of available classes,
course sections, or both, published electronically, before
the start of an academic term; and,
b) "OERs" are high-quality teaching, learning, and research
resources that reside in the public domain or have been
released under an intellectual property license, such as a
Creative Commons license, that permits their free use, and
repurposing by others, and may include other resources that
are legally available
EXISTING LAW:
1)Requires the CSU Trustees and the CCC Board of Governors, and
requests the Regents of the UC, to work with the academic
senates to encourage faculty to give consideration to the
least costly practices in assigning textbooks and to encourage
faculty to disclose to students how new editions of textbooks
are different from previous editions. Existing law also urges
textbook publishers to provide information to faculty when
they are considering what textbooks to order, and to post
information on the publishers' Web sites, including an
explanation of how the newest edition is different from
previous editions. In addition, publishers are asked to
disclose to faculty the length of time they intend to produce
the current edition and provide faculty free copies of each
textbook selected (Education Code (EC) Section 66406).
SB 1359
Page 4
2)Requires, via the College Textbook Transparency Act, each
campus bookstore at any public postsecondary educational
institution to post in its store or on its Web site a
disclosure of the retail price policy on new and used
textbooks (EC Section 66406.7).
3)Establishes the California Digital Open Source Library,
administered by the CSU in coordination with the CCC, for the
purpose of housing open source materials while providing
Web-based access for students, faculty and staff to find,
adopt, utilize, or modify course materials for little or no
cost (EC Section 66408).
4)Establishes the California Open Education Resources Council
and requires the council to be responsible for, among other
things, developing a list of 50 strategically selected lower
division courses in the public postsecondary segments for
which high-quality, affordable, digital open source textbooks
and related materials are to be developed or acquired (EC
Section 66409).
5)Requires, by January 1, 2020, publishers of textbooks used at
the UC, CSU, and the CCC, or private postsecondary educational
institutions, to the extent practicable, to make textbooks
available in whole or in part for sale in an electronic format
and requires the electronic format to contain the same content
as the printed version (EC Section 66410).
6)Establishes the Open Educational Resources Adoption Incentive
Program to incentivize faculty to accelerate the adoption of
lower cost, high-quality, OERs at CCC and CSU campuses. To
note, said program provides funding for faculty professional
development, professional development for staff, OER curation
activities, curriculum modification and requisite release time
SB 1359
Page 5
for faculty, and technology support (EC Section 67420).
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee:
1)CCC. Annual General Fund (Prop 98) costs of up to $100,000
for campuses to identify and disclose in course schedules
those classes using free digital materials.
2)CSU. Annual General Fund cost of around $100,000.
3)UC. Minor and absorbable costs.
COMMENTS: Background. According to the College Board, the
average undergraduate student should budget between $1,200 and
$1,300 for textbooks and supplies each year. That figure is as
much as 40% of tuition at a two-year community college and 13%
at a four-year public institution. According to the Student
Public Interest Research Groups (Student PIRGs), February 2015
report, entitled "Open Textbooks: The Billion-Dollar Solution,"
since 1978, college textbook costs have increased to 812%, that
is to say, it means that textbook prices have increased at 3.2
times the rate of inflation. A 2014 Student PIRG study found
that 65% of students skipped buying or renting a textbook
because it was too expensive, and 94% of those students felt
that in so doing, their grade would suffer in a course.
Additionally, almost half of the students said the cost of
textbooks impacted how many courses they were able to take.
Need for the measure. According to the author, by requiring
California's postsecondary educational institutions to, "clearly
and explicitly highlight by a symbol or logo, any courses that
use free digital course material in their online or print course
SB 1359
Page 6
catalogs, California's college students will be equipped with
easy-to-find information that assists them in navigating the
high cost of textbooks while at the same time create an
incentive for the mass adoption of free, open-sourced textbooks
and materials."
The author contends that this measure is an important step in
ensuring college textbooks and materials are affordable to all
students.
What are OER? OER are educational materials such as textbooks,
research articles, videos, assessments, or simulations that are
either licensed under an open copyright license or are in the
public domain. OERs provide no-cost access and no-cost
permission to revise, reuse, remix, or redistribute the
materials. According to a 2012 policy brief by the Center for
American Progress and EDUCAUSE, digital OERs offer many
advantages over traditional textbooks: they allow students and
faculty to access textbooks and related materials for free
online or purchase hardcopies that are more affordable than
traditional textbooks; they enable faculty to customize learning
materials to suit their course objectives; and, they can provide
students with a more flexible set of tools that can contribute
to a richer learning experience.
California OER Council. The California OER Council reports
that it has thus far selected the 50 courses, identified more
than 150 appropriate OERs for said courses, developed a
standardized peer review and approval process, and recruited
faculty to conduct the reviews. To note, as of December 2015,
the Council had identified more than 160 appropriate OER
textbooks for the 50 courses.
The national community college reform network Achieving the
Dream announced on June 14, 2016, an initiative to develop
SB 1359
Page 7
degree programs using OERs. The initiative involves 38
community colleges throughout 13 states, including two
California community colleges (Santa Ana College and West Hills
College Lemoore).
This measure seeks to ensure that students are aware of OER and
other low cost options available to them when securing course
materials, before they register for classes.
Prior and related legislation. AB 1914 (Bonilla), which is
pending a hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee, would,
among others, require the academic senates of campuses of the
CSU and the UC to develop policies regarding instructional
materials to encourage efforts to reduce redundancy in the
delivery of materials, and requires the CSU Trustees to review
and adopt those policies.
AB 456 (Patterson) of 2015, which was not moved by the author,
would have required the CSU, and requested the UC, to offer
discounted electronic textbook rentals to their students for
each textbook assigned in a course, if the content of the
electronic and printed versions of the textbook were the same.
AB 2471 (Lara) of 2011, which was held in the Assembly
Appropriations Committee, would have required e-textbooks used
in courses at the state's postsecondary institutions to include
specified consumer protections, and required the institutions to
adopt rules consistent with said requirements.
SB 1328 (De León) of 2011, which was not moved by the author in
this Committee, would have required a publisher to provide
textbook data in specified formats; encouraged public and
private postsecondary institutions to develop faculty textbook
adoption search engines with specified functions; and required
SB 1359
Page 8
campus bookstores at private and public postsecondary
institutions to provide a student textbook comparison engine on
their Web sites.
SB 216 (Liu) of 2009, which was held in the Senate
Appropriations Committee, would have among others, required the
CSU and the CCC to post a list of required textbooks for each
course on the internet at least 30 days prior to the first day
of class, including the price charged for each textbook.
SB 386 (Runner) of 2009, which was held in the Senate
Appropriations Committee, would have required a faculty member
at the CCC or the CSU, who adopts a new edition of a textbook
within three years after the adoption of a previous edition of
that textbook to prepare a justification for the adoption of the
new edition.
Analysis Prepared by:
Jeanice Warden / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960
FN: 0004022