BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1393|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                UNFINISHED BUSINESS 


          Bill No:  SB 1393
          Author:   De León (D) 
          Amended:  8/31/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE:  11-0, 4/19/16
           AYES:  Hueso, Morrell, Cannella, Gaines, Hertzberg, Hill, Lara,  
            Leyva, McGuire, Pavley, Wolk

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  6-1, 5/23/16
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza
           NOES:  Nielsen

           SENATE FLOOR:  27-8, 5/27/16
           AYES:  Allen, Beall, Block, De León, Galgiani, Glazer, Hall,  
            Hancock, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson,  
            Lara, Leno, Leyva, Liu, McGuire, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning,  
            Pan, Pavley, Roth, Wieckowski, Wolk
           NOES:  Anderson, Fuller, Moorlach, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen,  
            Stone, Vidak
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bates, Berryhill, Cannella, Gaines, Runner

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  Not available

           SUBJECT:   Energy efficiency and pollution reduction


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill makes clarifying amendments to existing code  
          that was originally added to statute as part of SB 350 (De Leon,  
          Chapter 547, Statutes of 2015).  










                                                                    SB 1393  
                                                                    Page  2



          Assembly Amendments (1) clarify that electricity generated by a  
          municipal solid waste (MSW) facility may qualify for credit  
          under the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) only if it was  
          generated before January 1, 2017, thereby eliminating  
          conflicting and ambiguous language that states electricity  
          generated by an MSW facility may qualify for RPS credit if it  
          was generated pursuant to a contract entered into before January  
          1, 2017; (2) eliminate language requiring a publicly owned  
          utility (POU) to report to the California Energy Commission  
          (CEC) information regarding the POU's use of public goods funds  
          and procurement plans; (3) conform two existing RPS exemptions  
          for POUs that own large hydroelectric facilities; (4) clarify  
          that a POU is to conduct efficiency studies and set targets only  
          every four years; and (5) streamline reporting requirements and  
          eliminates duplicate reporting requirements.


          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:
          
          1)Requires the state's electric utilities to procure 50 percent  
            of their electricity from qualifying renewable energy  
            resources.  This is known as the Renewable Portfolio Standard.  


          2)States that MSW electricity generation will not result in RPS  
            credits unless the generation occurs before January 1, 2017.   
            (Public Utilities Code §399.12 (e)(2))

          3)States that MSW electricity generation shall not produce  
            renewable energy credits unless (a) the MSW facility is  
            located in Stanislaus County, (b) the MSW facility was  
            operational prior to September 26, 1996, and (c) the MSW  
            generation was sold pursuant to a contract entered into before  
            January 1, 2017.  ((Public Utilities Code §399.12 (h)(3)(D))

          4)Provides an exemption to the RPS requirements for the Merced  
            Irrigation District in years when the district received  
            greater than 50 percent of its annual retail sales from its  
            own hydroelectric generation that is not an eligible renewable  








                                                                    SB 1393  
                                                                    Page  3



            energy resource.  (Public Utilities Code §399.30(k))

          5)Provides a general exemption to the RPS requirements for a POU  
            that procures greater than 50 percent of its retail sales from  
            qualifying large hydroelectric facilities.  (Public Utilities  
            Code §399.30(l))

          6)Requires a POU to annually report to the CEC its expenditures  
            of public goods funds. (Public Utilities Code §9598(c))

          7)Requires a POU to report to the CEC information regarding its  
            energy resources procurement plan.  (Public Utilities Code  
            §399.30(f))

          8)Requires a POU to report triennially and quadrennially  
            thereafter to the CEC its progress in meeting energy  
            efficiency targets. (Public Resources Code 25310(b) and Public  
            Utilities Code §9505)


          This bill makes numerous clarifying and substantive amendments  
          to code affected by last year's SB 350.  




          Among this bill's more significant effects:




           Clarifies that electricity generated by an MSW facility may  
            qualify for credit under the RPS only if it was generated  
            before January 1, 2017, thereby eliminating conflicting and  
            ambiguous language that states electricity generated by an MSW  
            facility may qualify for RPS credit if it was generated  
            pursuant to a contract entered into before January 1, 2017.   
            It is unclear how this change affects the status of  
            electricity generated by any existing MSW facility.











                                                                    SB 1393  
                                                                    Page  4




           Eliminates language requiring a POU to report to CEC  
            information regarding the POU's use of public goods funds and  
            procurement plans.  The CEC reports it generally has no use  
            for such information and, if it did, it could request the  
            information from a POU.




           Conforms two existing RPS exemptions for POUs that own large  
            hydroelectric facilities. One exemption applies to the Merced  
            Irrigation District. The second exemption is more generous and  
            applies to POUs with hydroelectric generation similar to that  
            of Merced. There is no clear policy rationale for maintaining  
            the differences between the two exemptions.




           Clarifies that a POU is to conduct efficiency studies and set  
            targets only every four years.




           Streamlines reporting requirements and eliminates duplicate  
            reporting requirements.


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No         Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:No




          According to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations:

          1)Increased annual the Air Resources Board costs of  
            approximately $80,000 (Cost of Implementation).










                                                                    SB 1393  
                                                                    Page  5



          2)Increased absorbable annual CEC costs.


          3)Minor, absorbable the California Public Utilities Commission  
            costs.




          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/31/16)


          None received


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/31/16)


          None received


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     According to the author's office,  
          there are several noncontroversial and clarifying amendments  
          needed to the statutory changes made by last year's SB 350.




          Prepared by:Jay Dickenson / E., U., & C. / (916) 651-4107
          8/31/16 23:01:40


                                   ****  END  ****