BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 1398
Page 1
SENATE THIRD READING
SB
1398 (Leyva)
As Amended June 30, 2016
Majority vote
SENATE VOTE: 36-0
------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Environmental |5-1 |Alejo, Dahle, |Gray |
|Safety | |Arambula, Lopez, | |
| | |McCarty | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Appropriations |17-2 |Gonzalez, Bloom, |Bigelow, Obernolte |
| | |Bonilla, Bonta, | |
| | |Calderon, Daly, | |
| | |Eggman, Gallagher, | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Eduardo Garcia, | |
| | |Holden, Jones, Quirk, | |
| | |Santiago, Wagner, | |
| | |Weber, Wood, Chu | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
SB 1398
Page 2
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Requires, by July 1, 2018, a public water system (PWS)
to identify and replace known lead service lines. Specifically,
this bill:
1)Requires, by July 1, 2018, a PWS to compile an inventory of
known lead service lines in use in its system, and identify
areas that may have lead service lines in use in its
distribution system. Requires a PWS to provide a timeline for
replacement of known lead service lines in its distribution
system to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water
Board).
2)Requires, by July 1, 2020, a PWS with areas that may have lead
service lines in its systems to do either of the following:
a) Determine the existence or absence of lead service lines
in use in their distribution systems and provide that
information to the State Water Board; or,
b) Provide a timeline for replacement of pipes, tubings,
and fittings connecting a water main to an individual water
meter or service connection whose content cannot be
determined to the State Water Board.
3)Authorizes the State Water Board to approve the timelines for
lead service line replacement and establishes a timeframe for
approving, denying and revising the PWS's proposed timelines.
Requires an approved timeline to be a public record and
available on the State Water Board's Internet Web site.
SB 1398
Page 3
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, any additional costs to the State Water Board would
not be significant, and likely absorbable.
COMMENTS:
Need for the bill: According to the author, "Given the age of
many of the underground pipes utilized within PWSs, it is not
commonly known where lead pipes disproportionately threaten the
public health of local communities. In fact, current federal or
state law does not require water districts to report locations
of lead service pipes. While lead pipes may be less common in
California, it is vital that we know where these pipes are and
eliminate them ? SB 1398 enhances public knowledge of remaining
lead pipes in use and implements a plan for their complete
removal from water for human consumption. By setting in motion
a plan to remove all lead from public water system pipes, SB
1398 helps to reduce public health risks and the costs of
corrosion control treatment from lead in public water system
pipes."
Lead in water: The most prevalent sources of lead in drinking
water are from pipes, fixtures, and associated hardware from
which the lead can leach. Lead can enter a building's drinking
water by leaching from lead service connections, from lead
solder used in copper piping, and from brass fixtures. The
amount of lead in tap water can depend on several factors,
including the age and material of the pipes, concentration of
lead in water delivered by the public utility (or, for private
domestic wells, the concentration of lead in raw groundwater),
and corrosivity (acidity, temperature, and the concentration of
other mineral components) of the water. More corrosive water
can cause greater leaching from pipes. As pipes age, mineral
deposits will form a coating on the inside of the pipes that
protect against further corrosion.
SB 1398
Page 4
To address the issue of lead in drinking water, this bill would
require a PWS to compile an inventory of all known lead service
lines in use in its distribution system, and identify areas that
may have lead service lines in use in its system. The PWS would
then have to establish a timeline for replacing those known lead
pipes and a separate timeline for investigating and replacing
the unknown pipes.
Flint, Michigan: Flint is located along the Flint River
northwest of Detroit, Michigan. In April 2014, Flint switched
its water supply from Lake Huron (via Detroit) to the Flint
River. The Flint River water is corrosive (high pH and low
salinity levels), which, absent an added corrosion inhibitor
chemical like orthophosphate, can erode the pipes or solder
exposing lead. As a cost-saving measure, water officials opted
not to add the corrosion inhibitor chemicals. The corrosive
Flint River water caused lead from aging pipes to leach into the
water supply, causing extremely elevated levels of lead. As a
result, between 6,000 and 12,000 children in Flint have been
exposed to drinking water with high levels of lead and they
potentially will experience a range of serious health problems.
Who is falling through the cracks in California: According to
the State Water Board, 98% of Californians are served by PWSs
drinking water that meets federal and state drinking water
standards, which leaves 2% of California's drinking water
failing to meet federal and state safe drinking water standards.
While the contaminated water serving that 2% is likely
contaminated at the drinking water source, lead contamination
from corroded plumbing could be a contributing factor.
On July 9, the Fresno Bee reported that lead has been found at
various residences with galvanized pipes in Northern Fresno,
possibly a result of corrosion from the City of Fresno's
(Fresno) water supplies from the Surface Water Treatment
Facility. Much is unknown about what is causing the problem and
how large the problem is. Fresno is testing homes in an effort
to pinpoint the factors causing the problem, from water
SB 1398
Page 5
chemistry to corrosion control to the types of pipes and
fixtures in affected homes. Potential solutions could be
incremental adjustments of pH levels, corrosion-control
chemicals in the water, running faucets to flush water from the
fixtures, and/or to replacing plumbing fixtures or service lines
coming off Fresno's water meters. As of last month, a total of
69 faucets in 39 homes tested positive for lead contamination at
levels in exceedance of 15 parts per billion, the threshold set
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) at
which corrective action must be taken.
Federal lead testing requirements: Under the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA), the US EPA is mandated to set enforceable
drinking water standards, or maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
for contaminants. While there is no MCL for lead, in 1991, the
US EPA adopted the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), which established
"action levels" for lead of 15 g/L (0.015 mg/L). The LCR
requires a PWS to test water at the tap at a sample of their
customers served for lead levels. If more than 10% of the
samples collected are at or above the action level for lead, it
can trigger 'actions' that include lead service line
replacement. The LCR requires lead samples to be collected
every six months. The LCR, however, is not an exhaustive
requirement for identifying the real potential for lead pipes
(or service lines) in a PWSs territory.
Given recent events in Flint, Michigan, the US EPA is increasing
oversight of state programs to identify and address any
deficiencies in current implementation of the LCR. The US EPA
is meeting with every state drinking water program across the
country to ensure states are taking appropriate actions to
address lead action level exceedences, including optimizing
corrosion control, providing effective public health
communication and outreach to residents to reduce lead exposure,
and removing lead service lines where required by the LCR.
This bill is getting in front of the problem by necessitating
SB 1398
Page 6
the replacement of all known lead-containing service lines
before they potentially leach lead into the drinking water they
convey.
Analysis Prepared by:
Paige Brokaw / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 319-3965 FN:
0003927