BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |SB 1422 |Hearing |4/27/16 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Glazer |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |3/28/16 |Fiscal: |No | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Weinberger | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Public utilities and other service suppliers: collection of local taxes Clarifies that cable service providers are covered by a state law that limits public utilities and other service providers' responsibilities for collecting utility user taxes. Background Utility users taxes (UUTs) are excise taxes imposed by cities and counties on the consumption of utility services, including electricity, gas, water, sewer, telephone, sanitation, and cable television. Although a city or county can impose a UUT as a special tax, generating revenues that must be used for a specific purpose, nearly all UUTs are imposed as general taxes, which allow revenues to be used for any purpose. In the 2014-15 fiscal year, 159 cities and 3 counties reported collecting, in total, more than $2 billion in UUT revenues. In jurisdictions that impose a UUT, a utility service provider collects the tax through the bills it sends to utility customers and remits the revenues to the local government that imposed the tax. State law establishes several limits on a public utility or other service supplier's duties and liabilities with regard to collecting UUTs and other taxes that local governments impose on utility consumers (AB 3155, Martinez, 1996). Specifically, to protect utility service suppliers from litigation over taxes SB 1422 (Glazer) 3/28/16 Page 2 of ? that they collect (but don't impose) and to ensure that utility providers have enough time to process any local modifications to utility users taxes, state law: Specifies that the public utility or service supplier is not liable to any customer for collecting the tax, regardless of whether the tax has been declared illegal, and has no duty to inquire with the local agency about the tax's validity. Directs that a local jurisdiction is solely responsible for refunding the tax if it is ordered to do so, although the utility or service supplier may assist the local jurisdiction if the local jurisdiction reimburses the cost of assistance. Prohibits a public utility or other service supplier from being named as a defendant in any action challenging the tax. Requires a local jurisdiction to notify the utility or service supplier in writing if it adopts a new tax, or makes changes to an existing tax that would affect collection and remittance. Grants a utility or service provider at least 90 days after notification to begin collecting a new tax and at least 60 days after notification to implement a change in an existing tax. In the statute that establishes these protections for public utilities and other service providers, the term "other service providers" is not defined. Some cable service providers worry that the absence of a definition of "other service providers" creates ambiguity that could allow current law to be misinterpreted as excluding cable operators from the protections that apply to public utilities. They want the Legislature to amend state law to explicitly include cable operators. Proposed Law SB 1422 (Glazer) 3/28/16 Page 3 of ? Senate Bill 1422, for the purposes of the statute that limits public utility or other service suppliers' duties and liabilities with regard to collecting utility taxes, defines the term "other service suppliers" as including a holder of a state franchise for the provision of video service. The bill declares that its provisions do not constitute a change in, but are declaratory of, existing law. State Revenue Impact No estimate. Comment Purpose of the bill . State law seeks to ensure that public utilities and other service suppliers are not subject to legal liability or other negative consequences for collecting utility user taxes that a local agency may be imposing on consumers improperly. Because the statute does not define the term "other service suppliers," advocates for some cable operators and other video service providers worry that it is ambiguous whether these statutory protections apply to a company that holds a state franchise to provide video service. Legislative histories of both the bill that enacted the protections for utility service providers (AB 3155, Martinez, 1996) and a bill that contained earlier version of those protections (SB 2143, Hurtt, 1996) strongly suggest that the Legislature intended to apply the protections to video service providers. Committee and floor analyses of these two bills indicate that cable companies were included among the sponsors of those bills and parenthetically cite cable companies as an example of "service suppliers." Despite this legislative history, there remains some risk that the statutory language could be misinterpreted to exclude cable operators and other video service providers. SB 1422 eliminates any uncertainty by explicitly defining "other service suppliers" as including video service providers. SB 1422 (Glazer) 3/28/16 Page 4 of ? Support and Opposition (4/21/16) Support : California Cable and Telecommunications Association. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --