BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  June 14, 2016


          Counsel:               Stella Choe








                         ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY


                       Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Chair





          SB  
          1474 (Committee on Public Safety) - As Amended April 7, 2016





          SUMMARY:  Makes technical and corrective changes, as well as  
          non-controversial substantive changes, to various code sections  
          relating generally to criminal justice laws.  Specifically, this  
          bill:



          1)Deletes references to the Sex Offender Tracking Program and  
            the High Risk Sex Offender Program within the Department of  
            Justice (DOJ) and instead includes general references to the  
            DOJ. 








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  2






          2)Allows the district attorney to send a subpoena to a peace  
            officer by electronic means.



          3)Provides that probation reports may be shared between  
            probation agencies.



          4)Deletes the requirement that a police vehicle that is  
            monitoring traffic be painted but continues to require the  
            vehicle be a distinctive color.



          5)Updates the section related to the collection of evidence in  
            sexual assault cases.





          6)Makes additional clarifying or technical changes.



          EXISTING LAW:



          1)Requires the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and  
            the State Department of State Hospitals to perform a risk  
            assessment of every eligible person under their jurisdiction,  
            as specified, and requires those departments to send the  
            scores obtained in accordance with those provisions to DOJ's  
            Sex Offender Tracking Program.  (Pen. Code, § 290.06.)









                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  3







          2)Requires the State Department of State Hospitals to provide to  
            DOJ's Sex Offender Tracking Program the names of all persons  
            committed to its custody pursuant to specified provisions of  
            law within 30 days of commitment, and requires that department  
            to provide the names of all of those persons released from its  
            custody within 5 working days of release.  (Pen. Code, §  
            290.46.)

          3)Specifies the means by which a peace officer may be subpoenaed  
            in a criminal matter.  (Pen. Code, § 1328, subd. (c).)





          4)Provides that the report prepared by the probation officer  
            shall be and constitute a part of the records of the court,  
            and shall at all times be open to the inspection of the court  
            or of any person appointed by the court for that purpose, as  
            well as all magistrates, and the chief of police, or other  
            heads of the police, unless otherwise order by the court.   
            (Pen. Code, § 1203.10.)

          5)States that a traffic officer on duty for the exclusive main  
            purpose of enforcing traffic laws shall wear a full  
            distinctive uniform, and if the officer while on duty uses a  
            motor vehicle, it must be painted a distinctive color  
            specified by the commissioner.  (Veh. Code, § 40800.)



          6)Sets the minimum standards for examination and treatment of  
            victims of sexual assault and lists what should be in a sexual  
            assault collection kit. (Pen. Code, § 13823.11.)











                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  4







          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown





          COMMENTS:  



          1)Author's Statement:  According to the author, "This is the  
            annual omnibus bill. In past years, the omnibus bill has been  
            introduced by all members of the Committee on Public Safety.  
            This bill is similar to the ones introduced as Committee bills  
            in the past in that it has been introduced with the following  
            understanding: the bill's provisions make only technical or  
            minor changes to the law; and there is no opposition by any  
            member of the Legislature or recognized group to the proposal.  
            This procedure has allowed for introduction of fewer minor  
            bills and has saved the Legislature time and expense over the  
            years."

          2)Subpoenaing a Peace Officer:  Under existing law, a peace  
            officer may be served a subpoena to appear in court in a  
            criminal matter either by personal delivery of the subpoena to  
            the officer or to the officer's immediate supervisor or agent  
            designated by the immediate supervisor, or in counties where  
            the local agencies have consented with the local marshal's  
            office or sheriff's office to receive subpoenas by electronic  
            means, the subpoena may be served electronically to the  
            officer's immediate supervisor or agent designated by the  
            immediate supervisor. (Pen. Code, § 1328, subd. (c).)  

          This bill would allow a district attorney to subpoena an officer  
            by electronic means. According to the California District  
            Attorneys Association, the organization that requested this  
            update to the statute:








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  5






            "About a dozen [district attorney] DA offices in California  
            use a case management system that allows them to generate an  
            electronic subpoena for a peace officer employed by a  
            participating agency. The subpoena can be electronically sent  
            to a portal. The peace officer named in the subpoena receives  
            an email directing him or her to go to the portal for the  
            subpoena. Once the peace officer uses his or her credentials  
            to access the portal and open the subpoena, service is  
            complete. The DA will have an electronic record of the service  
            of the subpoena and the appropriate superior officers within  
            the police agency will have access to the portal to monitor  
            issuance and service of the subpoenas.

            "The main distinction between this newer process and the  
            electronic service specifically authorized by section 1328(c)  
            is that now the electronic subpoena can be sent directly to  
            the peace officer named in the subpoena through the portal,  
            rather than to his or her superior for subsequent service on  
            the officer. This newer technology should permit simpler and  
            more reliable service. Section 1328(c) should be amended to  
            add this third more direct mode of electronic service to the  
            two current options contained in the statute. The statute  
            should also be amended to add the 'district attorney' to the  
            'marshal or sheriff' as officials with whom local police  
            agencies may enter into an agreement to receive electronic  
            service of subpoenas. By simply adding an additional option  
            for electronic service, this amendment would not interfere  
            with any agencies that are currently using the procedures  
            authorized under the existing section 1328(c)."

          3)DOJ Sex Offender Tracking Program:  Existing law requires law  
            enforcement agencies to submit information on registered sex  
            offenders to the DOJ, Sex Offender Tracking Program.  (Pen.  
            Code, §§ 290.06, subd. (a)(5), 290.46, subd. (a)(3), and  
            1203e, subd. (c) The program was renamed but remains unchanged  
            in the relevant statutes.

          According to DOJ, "[t]o avoid confusion with the obsolete  








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  6





            program name, references to the Sex Offender Trafficking  
            Program should be replaced with generic references to DOJ.   
            This will help ensure DOJ is appropriately identified as the  
            recipient of mandated information, rather than referring to a  
            particular unit or program."

          4)Painted Police Vehicles:  Existing law provides that a police  
            vehicle monitoring traffic "shall be painted a distinctive  
            color specified by the commissioner." (Veh. Code, § 40800.)   
            This bill removes the requirement that police vehicles be  
            "painted" but continues to require the vehicle to be a  
            distinctive color.

          According to the California Police Chiefs Association, the  
            organization that requested this change, the term "painted" is  
            problematic because agencies have begun to use "vehicle wrap"  
            rather than paint, which is how Ford ships its new black &  
            white cars. Some jurisdictions are concerned about the wording  
            in the current statute that they ordered their Fords black and  
            paid to have them actually painted.  

          5)Probation Reports:  Existing law specifies what shall be in a  
            probation report and who shall have access to the reports.   
            This bill amends that section to specify that probation  
            agencies can share reports with other agencies. According to  
            the Chief Probation Officers of California, the organization  
            that requested this update to the statutes:

            "Record requests and transfers between probation departments  
            are routinely made in managing persons on supervised release.  
            Currently, PC 1203.10 does not expressly recognize this  
            practice. This proposal would clarify that probation  
            departments can share probation reports with other probation  
            agencies for the purpose of carrying out the duties of this  
            section pertaining to the care and supervision of supervised  
            persons."

          6)Update Requirements for Sex Assault Kits:  Existing law  
            specifies what physical evidence shall be collected from a  








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  7





            sexual assault victim.  (Pen. Code, § 13823.11, subd. (g).)   
            The California Clinical Forensic Medical Training Center  
            suggested this amendment in order to conform to updated  
            collection methods including the advent of DNA science and  
            technology.

          7)Prior Legislation:

             a)   SB 795 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 499,  
               Statutes of 2015, was the annual 2015 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             b)   SB 1461 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 54,  
               Statutes of 2014, was the annual 2014 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             c)   SB 514 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 59,  
               Statutes of 2013, was the annual 2013 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             d)   SB 1144 (Strickland), Chapter 867, Statutes of 2012, was  
               the annual 2012 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             e)   SB 428 (Strickland), Chapter 304, Statutes of 2011, was  
               the annual 2011 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             f)   SB 1062 (Strickland), Chapter 708, Statutes of 2010, was  
               the annual 2010 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             g)   SB 174 (Strickland), Chapter 35, Statutes of 2009, was  
               the annual 2009 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             h)   SB 1241 (Margett), Chapter 699, Statutes of 2008, was  
               the annual 2008 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             i)   SB 425 (Margett), Chapter 302, Statutes of 2007, was the  
               annual 2007 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             j)   SB 1422 (Margett), Chapter 901, Statutes of 2006, was  








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  8





               the annual 2006 Public Safety Committee's omnibus bill.

             aa)  SB 1107 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 279,  
               Statutes of 2005, was the annual 2005 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             bb)  SB 1796 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 405,  
               Statutes of 2004, was the annual 2004 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             cc)  SB 851 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 468,  
               Statutes of 2003, was the annual 2003 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             dd)  SB 1852 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 545,  
               Statutes of 2002, was the annual 2002 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             ee)  SB 485 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 473,  
               Statutes of 2001, was the annual 2001 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             ff)  SB 832 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 853,  
               Statutes of 1999, was the annual 1999 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.

             gg)  SB 1880 (Committee on Public Safety), Chapter 606,  
               Statutes of 1998, was the annual 1998 Public Safety  
               Committee's omnibus bill.



          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:





          Support








                                                                    SB 1474


                                                                    Page  9







          


          California District Attorneys Association





          Opposition


          


          None 





          Analysis Prepared by:Stella Choe / PUB. S. / (916)  
          319-3744