BILL ANALYSIS AB 1624 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1624 (Bowen) - As Amended: May 18, 1993 ASSEMBLY ACTIONS: COMMITTEE RULES VOTE 8-0 COMMITTEE W. & M. VOTE 21-0 DIGEST Existing law: 1) Requires the Legislature to provide notice of meetings and to open š proceedings to the public. The Legislative Open Records Act (Govt. Code Sec. 9070, et seq.) and the Open Meetings Act of 1989 (Govt. Code Sec. 9027, et seq.) both serve to provide the public with extensive knowledge of the process. 2) Provides that the public has access to all bills and legislative š documents through the Capitol bill room. Bill texts, amendments, analyses and related information are also available for a fee through several computer information services, various law book companies and newspapers. This bill: 1) Requires the Legislative Counsel, with the advice of the Joint Rules š Committee, to make available to the public specified legislative data in electronic form. 2) Reserves to the Legislative Counsel the right to charge a fee to any š user who subsequently sells the data. 3) Appropriates to the Legislative Counsel any moneys/funds received from š the above fees. FISCAL EFFECT The costs of creating the information are primarily borne by the šLegislative Counsel Bureau. Cost of preparing the data for release to špublic electronic networks will involve acquisition of gateways and servers šplus some software creation. Legislative Counsel estimates costs at šapproximately $50,000. COMMENTS The Legislature presently makes hard copies of all documents available to šall libraries and colleges that request these documents (98 libraries and š61 colleges and universities statewide). Additionally, 1,718 subscribers šreceive various levels of bill service ranging from $140 for the Index to š$2,545 for the full service (pick-up). -continued- AB 1624 Page 1 AB 1624 A large body of potential users of legislative information in electronic šform exists. The appropriate format needed to serve the greatest number of šusers and the actual number of users is currently unknown. Without this šinformation, the difficulty of identifying a general format is greatly šincreased. The proposal to have volunteer programmers write access systems may have šthe effect of limiting the usefulness of the data since no central šinformation retrieval plan would prevail. The Internet (a worldwide network) is one of many systems which could šreceive the raw data. A format which enables Internet users to receive the šdata may exclude users of other networks. A study of the potential user groups and the most useful, efficient data šdistribution mode would clarify many of the ambiguities present in the bill šas drafted. FN 001928 -continued- AB 1624 Page 2