BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



SENATE RULES COMMITTEE
Office of Senate Floor Analyses
1020 N Street, Suite 524
(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) 327-4478
                                                              
                                                        .

                                           THIRD READING
                                                              
                                                        .

Bill No:  SB 1025
Author:   Peace (D)
Amended:  4/5/95
Vote:     21
                                                              
                                                        .

 SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE:   5-0, 3/28/95
AYES:  Alquist, Hughes, Kelley, Mountjoy, Peace
NOT VOTING:  Hayden, Leonard, Rosenthal, Russell

 SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:   Senate Rule 28.8 
                                                              
                                                        .

SUBJECT:    Public utilities:  water corporations

 SOURCE:     Author
                                                              
                                                        .

DIGEST:    This bill allows Californiaos investor-owned  
water utilities to use the proceeds from the sale of  
onon-used and usefulo property to upgrade its  
infrastructure, plant, facilities and properties.

 ANALYSIS:    There are approximately 250 investor-owned,  
Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulated water utilities  
providing service throughout California.  These water  
companies provide service to approximately 20% of the  
stateos population.  Because of their small size relative  
to traditional investor owned utilities, obtaining  
financing for infrastructure improvements has been  
historically difficult.  Often the improvements are  
mandated by state and federal laws regarding water purity  
and health concerns.

                                                     
CONTINUED





                                                     SB  
1025
                                                             
Page 2

The capital outlay demands on water companies have  
escalated in recent years.  State and federal safe drinking  
water laws require increased water treatment (requiring  
improvements to existing treatment facilities). As these  
facilities are upgraded with the advent of new technologies  
and in compliance with legislative mandates, outdated  
facilities are removed from service.  As a result,  utility  
property which was once oused and usefulo becomes obsolete.  
 Obsolete facilities are no longer allowed to be used in  
the determination of a utilityos rate of return on  
investment, yet the allocation between the shareholders and  
the ratepayers for the proceeds from a sale of these  
properties has not yet been definitively determined.

The PUC, which is charged with the regulation of the water  
companies, has issued several decisions in the area of  
ogain on saleo (the disposition of the proceeds) from a  
sale of non used and useful property.  In some instances,  
the PUC has allowed a water company to allow the gains to  
revert to shareholders.  In other instances, the PUC has  
required the company to flow all or part of the gains to  
ratepayers often in the form of lower rates.

This bill attempts to create a uniform standard that would  
accrue all gains on the sale of property back to the owners  
for the specified use of improvements in infrastructure and  
then after a period of ten years, the proceeds will be  
allocated to ratepayers.

 FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes

 SUPPORT:   (Verified  4/26/95)

California Water Association
California Water Service Company
Dominguez Services Corporation
San Gabriel Valley Water Association

 OPPOSITION:    (Verified  4/26/95)

California Public Utilities Commission
Department of Finance
                                                     
CONTINUED





                                                     SB  
1025
                                                             
Page 3


 ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:    Proponents argue the intent of the  
bill is to create a uniform standard for all water  
utilities, resulting in predictability in business  
practices and regulatory policies.  They note the  
escalating capital outlay demands on water companies.

 ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:    The PUC has generally allocated  
gain from the sale of utility property on a case-by-case  
basis.  The commission believes that this bill would remove  
flexibility from the commission to decide allocation of  
gain on sale in individual cases.
 
NC:sl  4/26/95  Senate Floor Analyses

                      ****  END  ****



























                                                     
CONTINUED