BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                                                          SB 1025

Date of Hearing: June 12, 1995                           

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                       Mickey Conroy, Chair

           SB 1025 (Peace) - As Amended:  April 5, 1995

 SUBJECT

Public utilities: water corporations.

 DIGEST

 Existing law allows the California Public Utilities Commission to  
regulate utilities, including water corporations.

 This bill requires a water corporation, when it sells any real  
property that was at any time, but now is no longer, necessary or  
useful in the performance of the water corporation's duties to the  
public, to invest any net proceeds from the sale in water system  
infrastructure, plant facilities, and properties that are  
necessary or useful in the performance of its duties to the  
public.

 FISCAL EFFECT

According to the Department of Finance, the CPUC anticipates a  
minor and absorbable fiscal impact on its operations to consider  
these reinvestments in the general rate cases.  CPUC also  
anticipates that there probably would be no net effect on  
ratepayers.

 COMMENTS

1)  There are approximately 250 investor-owned, CPUC regulated,  
    water utilities providing service throughout California.   
    These water companies provide service to approximately 20% of  
    the state's population.  Because of their small size relative  

                                                       - continued  
-

                                                          SB 1025
                                                         Page 1









                                                          SB 1025

    to traditional investor owned utilities, obtaining financing  
    for infrastructure improvements has been historically  
    difficult.  Often the improvements are mandated by state and  
    federal laws regarding water purity and health concerns.

2)  The capital outlay demands on water companies have escalated  
    in recent years.  State and federal safe drinking water laws  
    mandate increased water treatment, which often requires  
    improvement in water treatment facilities. As these facilities  
    are upgraded in compliance with legislative mandates and with  
    the advent of new technologies, outdated facilities are  
    removed from service.  As a result, utility property which was  
    once used and useful becomes obsolete.  Obsolete facilities  
    are no longer allowed to be 
used in the determination of a utility's rate of return on  
investment, yet the determination of the allocation between the  
shareholders and the ratepayers for the proceeds from a sale of  
these properties has not yet been definitively determined.

3)  The CPUC, which is charged with the regulation of water  
    companies, has issued several decisions in the area of  
    gain-on-sale (the disposition of the proceeds) from a sale of  
    non-used and useful property.  In some instances, the CPUC has  
    permitted a water company to allow the gains to revert to  
    shareholders.  In other instances, the CPUC has required the  
    water company to flow all or part of the gains to ratepayers,  
    often in the form of lower rates.

4)  This bill establishes a standard for the allocation of gains  
    on the sale of real property for water companies:  return of  
    the funds to infrastructure, plant, facilities, and properties  
    of the water company for a period of ten years.  Subsequently,  
    all proceeds not invested within the  designated ten year  
    period are returned solely to the ratepayers.

5)  The CPUC has generally allocated gain from the sale of utility  
    property on a case-by-case basis.  the CPUC believes this bill  
    would remove their flexibility to decide the allocation of  

                                                       - continued  
-

                                                          SB 1025
                                                         Page 2









                                                          SB 1025

    proceeds from gain on sale in individual cases.          

 SUPPORT

California Water Association (sponsor)
Fontana Water Company
San Gabriel Valley Water Company
Southern California Water Company

 OPPOSITION

California Public Utilities Commission
Department of Finance

























                                                       - continued  
-

                                                          SB 1025
                                                         Page 3