BILL NUMBER: SB 1898 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 18, 1996 INTRODUCED BY Senators Alquist and Kopp (Coauthors: Assembly Members Bowen and Cunneen) FEBRUARY 22, 1996An act to add Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 11776) to Chapter 7 of, and to add Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11781) to, Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to amend Section 11112.3 of the Penal Code, to repeal Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100) of, and Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 12120) of, Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, and to amend Sections 4902 and 4903 of the Unemployment Insurance Code,An act to amend Section 11710 of the Government Code, relating to information technology. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1898, as amended, Alquist. Department of Information Technology. There is in existing law in the executive branch the Department of Information Technology, that is managed by the Director of Information Technology, who is appointed by the Governor with the consent of the Senate. Existing law requires the director, subject to the State Civil Service Act, to appoint any other assistants and other employees as are necessary for the administration of the department and to prescribe their duties. This bill would require the Governor, upon recommendation by the director, to appoint 3 officers exempt from civil service who are necessary for the administration of the department.Existing law provides for the establishment of the Department of Information Technology that is managed by the Director of Information Technology. The duties of the department include providing statewide guidance to state agencies regarding acquisition, management, and appropriate uses of information technology and developing statewide policies and plans for information technology. This bill would require the Director of Information Technology to form an advisory committee, as specified, to review state information technology plans and issues and provide recommendations and counsel to the director on information technology. This bill would require the Department of Information Technology to provide necessary staff support for the advisory committee. Existing law requires the Department of General Services to perform specified responsibilities with respect to the acquisition of information technology and telecommunications goods and services. This bill would transfer those responsibilities from the Department of General Services to the Department of Information Technology. This bill would also make conforming changes to various provisions of existing law.Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:SECTION 1. Article 9.5 (commencing with SectionSECTION 1. Section 11710 of the Government Code is amended to read: 11710. (a) There is hereby created in the executive branch the Department of Information Technology, that shall be managed by the Director of Information Technology, who shall be appointed by the Governor, with the consent of the Senate, and who shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor. (b) The department, among other duties, shall perform the statutory duties and responsibilities of the former Office of Information Technology. Any reference in any law to the Office of Information Technology or the director of that office shall be considered a reference to the Department of Information Technology and the Director of Information Technology, as the case may be, unless the context otherwise requires. (c) The Governor, upon recommendation of the director, shall appoint three officers exempt from civil service who are necessary for the administration of the department. Subject to the State Civil Service Act (Part 2 (commencing with Section 18500) of Division 5 of Title 2 of the Government Code), the director shall appoint any other assistants and other employees as are necessary for the administration of the department and shall prescribe their duties. (d) The department shall provide leadership, guidance, and oversight of information technology in state government, including, but not limited to, all of the following: (1) Development of statewide vision, strategies, plans, policies, requirements, standards, and infrastructure. (2) Implementation of efficient, effective, and timely information technology acquisition and project management processes. (3) Identification of available information technology resources from both public and private sectors. (4) Development and implementation of an information technology equipment and software acquisition strategy that moves the state steadily to an architecture to provide maximum practical compatibility to facilitate information sharing among all computing systems in state government. (5) Promotion of reforms in information technology personnel classifications and in systems and procedures that reward skill in meeting business needs and facilitation of change with effective application of information technology. (e) The Department of Information Technology shall have possession and control of all relevant records and papers held for the benefit or use of the former Office of Information Technology in the performance of its statutory duties, powers, purposes, and responsibilities.11776) is added to Chapter 7 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read: Article 9.5. Information Technology Advisory Committee 11776. The Director of Information Technology shall form an advisory committee to review state information technology plans and issues and provide recommendations and counsel to the director for the purpose of meeting the intent of the Legislature as expressed in this chapter. The advisory committee shall consist of seven members appointed by the Director of Information Technology. 11777. Individuals appointed to the advisory committee shall be expert in matters of information technology planning, implementation, or management, and are to be selected from the public, business, academic, or other governmental sectors. Members of the committee shall serve without compensation but may be reimbursed for actual and necessary travel expenses. 11778. The Department of Information Technology shall provide necessary staff support for the advisory committee. 11779. The advisory committee shall prepare a written agenda for each of its meetings, and the advisory committee's findings and recommendations shall be in writing. These written documents shall be available to interested parties upon request. SEC. 2. Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11781) is added to Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 8. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 11781. The Legislature finds that the unique aspects of information technology systems and telecommunications systems and the importance of those systems to state programs warrant a separate acquisition authority for information technology and telecommunications goods and services. The Legislature further finds that this separate authority should enable the timely acquisition of goods and services in order to meet the state's needs in the most value-effective manner. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all contracts for the acquisition of information technology or telecommunications services and all contracts for the acquisition of information technology or telecommunications goods, whether by lease or purchase, shall be made by or under the supervision of the Department of Information Technology. 11782. The Regents of the University of California and the Trustees of the California State University shall not be subject to this chapter except that the trustees shall develop policies and procedures maintained in its state university administrative manual that further the legislative policies for procurement expressed in this chapter but without the involvement of the Director of Information Technology or the Department of Information Technology. 11783. The Trustees of the California State University are subject to Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 10115) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code. The contents of any report that the trustees are required to submit to the Governor and the Legislature pursuant to that article shall be organized so that, whenever applicable, each campus is individually featured. 11784. For purposes of this chapter, the definitions contained in Section 11702 shall apply and "value-effective acquisition" may be defined to include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) The operational cost that the state would incur if the bid or proposal is accepted. (b) Quality of the product or service, or its technical competency. (c) Reliability of delivery and implementation schedules. (d) The maximum facilitation of data exchange and systems integration. (e) Warranties, guarantees, and return policy. (f) Vendor financial stability. (g) Consistency of the proposed solution with the state's planning documents and announced strategic program direction. (h) Quality and effectiveness of business solution and approach. (i) Industry and program experience. (j) Prior record of vendor performance. (k) Vendor expertise with engagements of similar scope and complexity. (l) Extent and quality of the proposed participation and acceptance by all user groups. (m) Proven development methodologies and tools. (n) Innovative use of current technologies and quality results. 11785. It is the intent of the Legislature that policies developed by the Department of Information Technology in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 11711 provide for: (a) The expeditious and value-effective acquisition of information technology and telecommunications goods and services to satisfy state requirements. (b) The acquisition of information technology and telecommunications goods and services within a competitive framework. (c) The delegation of authority by the Department of Information Technology to each state agency that has demonstrated to the department's satisfaction the ability to conduct value-effective information technology and telecommunications goods and services acquisitions. (d) The exclusion from state bid processes, at the state's option, of any vendor having failed to meet prior contractual requirements related to information technology or telecommunications goods and services. (e) The review and resolution of protests submitted by a vendor or vendors with respect to any information technology or telecommunications goods and services acquisitions. 11786. Commencing on January 1, 1997, the Department of Information Technology shall prenegotiate the repetitively used terms and conditions in the state's model contract with each interested vendor who bids or proposes on information technology or telecommunications procurements. The contract language shall be kept on file, as a matter of public record, and shall remain operational until either the state or the vendor provides 30 days' notice to the other party that new negotiations are deemed appropriate. If, for a particular procurement, the state seeks to make any further changes to either the negotiated or the standard contract language, or both, it shall identify those changes to each bidder or proposer prior to the due date for the bid or proposal. If for a particular procurement, a bidder or proposer seeks to propose a negotiated change or standard contract language change, it shall make this identification within the timeframe identified in the solicitation document. 11787. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that agencies of the State of California utilize an acquisition method that is compatible with their short- and long-term fiscal needs in contracts relating to commodities and information technology and telecommunications goods and services. State agencies should be able to specify their anticipated life cycle requirements that would become one of the criteria for procurement selection. These agencies should be given the choice of vendors to meet statewide standardization needs, unique service requirements, application requirements, and long-term satisfaction criteria. There is a need for the State of California to enter into long-term contracts with annual cancellation and fund-out clauses, as required, to protect the state's interests as well as provide the option for multiyear renewals to encourage vendors to develop higher levels of service and support throughout the contracts. (b) The state may utilize multiple awards including federal General Service Administration Multiple Awards Schedules in procurements for commodities and information technology and telecommunications goods; master services agreements for information technology personal services; master agreements for equipment; and master equipment services agreements. For purposes of this subdivision, a multiple award is an award of an indefinite quantity contract for one or more similar goods to more than one vendor. Except for possible multiple awards as permitted by this subdivision, all the requirements of this chapter pertaining to other types of information technology and telecommunications procurements shall be followed. The Department of Information Technology shall ensure that multiple award schedules are in compliance with all other applicable statutes. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, state agencies, in exercising their delegation of procurement authority from the Department of Information Technology, may make awards to vendors, in an amount not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) per transaction, who have multiple award schedules with the General Services Administration of the United States on the same terms, conditions, and prices if the vendor is willing to do so. The Department of Information Technology may also develop multiple award agreements for use by state agencies in the same manner. 11788. The Department of Information Technology shall maintain, in the State Administrative Manual, policies and procedures governing the acquisition and disposal of information technology and telecommunications goods and services. (a) Acquisition of information technology and telecommunications goods and services shall be conducted through competitive means, except when the Department of Information Technology determines that (1) the goods and services proposed for acquisition are the only goods and services that can meet the state's need, or (2) the goods and services are needed in cases of emergency where immediate acquisition is necessary for the protection of the public health, welfare, or safety. The acquisition mode to be used and the procedure to be followed shall be approved by the Director of Information Technology. The Department of Information Technology shall maintain, in the State Administrative Manual, appropriate criteria and procedures to ensure compliance with the intent of this chapter. These criteria and procedures shall include acquisition and contracting guidelines to be followed by state agencies with respect to the acquisition of information technology and telecommunications goods and services. These guidelines may be in the form of standard formats or model formats. (b) Contract awards for all large-scale systems integration projects shall be based on the proposal that provides the most value-effective solution to the state's requirements, as determined by the evaluation criteria contained in the solicitation document. Evaluation criteria for procurement of information technology and telecommunications services, including systems integration, shall provide for the selection of a vendor on an objective basis not limited to cost alone. (1) The Department of Information Technology shall invite active participation, review, advice, comment, and assistance from the private sector and state agencies in developing procedures to streamline and to make the acquisition process more efficient, including, but not limited to, consideration of comprehensive statements in the request for proposals of the business needs and governmental functions, access to studies, planning documents, feasibility study reports and draft requests for proposals applicable to procurements, minimizing the time and cost of the proposal submittal and selection process, and development of a procedure for submission and evaluation of a single rather than multiple proposals. (2) Solicitations for acquisitions based on evaluation criteria other than cost alone shall provide that sealed cost proposals shall be submitted and that they shall be opened at a time and place designated in the solicitation for bids and proposals. Evaluation of all criteria, other than cost, shall be completed prior to the time designated for public opening of cost proposals, and the results of the completed evaluation shall be published immediately before the opening of cost proposals. The state's contact person for administration of the procurement shall be identified in the solicitation for bids and proposals, and that person shall execute a certificate under penalty of perjury, which shall be made a permanent part of the official procurement file, that all cost proposals received by the state have been maintained sealed and under lock and key until the time cost proposals are opened. (c) The acquisition of hardware purchased independently of a system integration project may be made on the basis of lowest cost meeting all other specifications. (d) Whenever an acquisition is based upon cost alone, so that the award of a contract, purchase order, or delegated purchase order is made to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the specifications, the 5-percent small business preference provided for in Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 14835) of Part 5.5 and the regulations implementing that chapter shall be accorded to all qualifying small businesses. (e) For all transactions formally advertised, evaluation of bidders' proposals for the purpose of determining contract award for information technology and telecommunications goods shall provide for consideration of a bidder's best financing alternatives, including lease or purchase alternatives, if any bidder so requests, not less than 30 days prior to the date of final bid submission, unless the acquiring agency can prove to the satisfaction of the Department of Information Technology that a particular financing alternative should not be so considered. (f) Acquisition authority may be delegated by the Department of Information Technology to any state agency that has been determined by the Department of Information Technology to be capable of effective use of that authority. This authority may be limited by the Department of Information Technology. Acquisitions conducted under delegated authority shall be reviewed by the Department of Information Technology on a selective basis. (g) To the extent practical, the solicitation documents shall provide for a contract to be written to enable acquisition of additional items to avoid essentially redundant acquisition processes when it can be determined that it is economical to do so. Further, it is the intent of the Legislature that, if a state information technology advisory committee or a state telecommunications advisory committee is established by the Governor or the Director of Information Technology, the policies and procedures developed by the Director of Information Technology in accordance with this chapter shall be submitted to that committee, including vendor representatives, for review and comment, and that the comment be considered by the agency prior to the adoption of any policy or procedure. (h) Protest procedures shall be developed to provide bidders an opportunity to protest formally with respect to any acquisition conducted in accordance with this chapter. The procedures shall provide that protests must be filed no later than five working days after the issuance of an intent to award. Authority to protest may be limited to participating bidders. The Director of Information Technology, or a person designated by the director, may consider and decide on initial protests. A decision regarding an initial protest shall be final. If prior to the last day to protest, any vendor who has submitted an offer files a protest with the agency against the awarding of the contract or purchase order on the ground that his or her bid or proposal should have been selected in accordance with the selection criteria in the solicitation document, the contract or purchase order shall not be awarded until either the protest has been withdrawn or the State Board of Control has made a final decision as to the action to be taken relating to the protest. Within 10 calendar days after filing a protest, the protesting vendor shall file with the State Board of Control a full and complete written statement specifying in detail the grounds of the protest and the facts in support thereof. (i) Information technology and telecommunications goods that have been determined to be surplus to state needs shall be disposed of in a manner that will best serve the interests of the state. Procedures governing the disposal of surplus goods may include auction or transfer to local governmental entities. (j) A vendor may be excluded from bid processes if the vendor's performance with respect to a previously awarded contract has been unsatisfactory, as determined by the state in accordance with established procedures which shall be maintained in the State Administrative Manual. This exclusion may not exceed 360 calendar days for any one determination of unsatisfactory performance. Any vendor excluded in accordance with this section shall be reinstated as a qualified vendor at any time during this 360-day period, upon demonstrating to the agency's satisfaction that the problems which resulted in the vendor's exclusion have been corrected. 11789. In addition to the mandatory requirements enumerated in Section 11788, the acquisition policies developed and maintained by the Department of Information Technology in accordance with this chapter may provide for: (a) Price negotiation with respect to contracts entered into in accordance with this chapter. (b) System or equipment component performance, or availability standards, including an assessment of the added cost to the state to receive contractual guarantee of a level of performance. (c) Requirement of a bond or assessment of a cost penalty with respect to a contract or consideration of a contract offered by a vendor whose performance has been determined unsatisfactory in accordance with established procedures maintained in the State Administrative Manual as required by Section 11788. 11790. Beginning on December 15, 1997, and annually thereafter, the Department of Information Technology shall provide a report listing all acquisitions from the previous fiscal year that were subject to this chapter and involved the replacement of a computer central processing unit when only one bid was received and the bid was from the vendor whose equipment was being replaced. The report shall be submitted to the chairperson of the committee in each house that considers appropriations, the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Committee on Information Technology in State Government, and the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. 11791. The Department of Information Technology shall develop policies and procedures that implement the intent of this chapter. 11792. The Department of Information Technology may, in addition to fulfilling the mandatory requirements enumerated in Section 11788, adopt rules and regulations that are necessary for the purposes of this chapter. 11793. Until such time as the Department of Information Technology has published in the State Administrative Manual the procedures required in accordance with Section 11788, acquisitions of information technology and telecommunications goods and services shall be accomplished in accordance with existing State Administrative Manual procedures for the acquisition of information technology goods and services with the Department of Information Technology serving in the place of the Department of General Services. 11794. The Director of Information Technology may make the services of the agency under this chapter available, upon those terms and conditions as may be deemed satisfactory, to any tax-supported public agency in the state, including a school district, for assisting the agency in the purchase or lease of information technology or telecommunications goods or services. 11795. (a) The Department of Information Technology is authorized to make purchases or leases of information technology or telecommunications goods and services, other than printed material, on behalf of any city, county, city and county, district, or other local governmental body or corporation empowered to expend public funds for the acquisition of goods or services, upon written request of the local agency, provided that the purchase or lease can be made by the Department of Information Technology upon the same terms, conditions, and specifications at a price lower than the local agency can obtain through its normal acquisition procedures. The state shall incur no financial responsibility in connection with purchases for local agencies under this section. No purchase or lease shall be for less than five hundred dollars ($500) and the local agency shall accept sole responsibility for payment to the vendor. All purchases and leases shall be subject to audit and inspection by the local agency for which made. (b) Purchases and leases under this section shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter. (c) A charge shall be made to each local agency availing itself of this service, the charge to be not less than the estimated cost to the Department of Information Technology of rendering the service, including costs incurred by the Department of Information Technology in preparation for a purchase or lease requested by a local agency in instances where the request is canceled or withdrawn by the local agency prior to award of the contract or purchase order by the Department of Information Technology. 11796. Any contract for information technology or telecommunications goods or services, to be manufactured or performed by the contractor especially for the state and not suitable for sale to others in the ordinary course of the contractor's business may provide, on the terms and conditions the agency deems necessary to protect the state's interests, for progress payments for work performed and costs incurred at the contractor's shop or plant, provided that not less than 10 percent of the contract price is required to be withheld until final delivery and acceptance of the goods or services, and provided further, that the contractor is required to submit a faithful performance bond, acceptable to the agency, in a sum not less than one-half of the total amount payable under the contract securing the faithful performance of the contract by the contractor. 11797. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, state and local agencies may enter into agreements to pay for telecommunications services to be utilized beyond the current fiscal year. "Telecommunications services" for purposes of this section shall include, but not be limited to, central office-based leased communications systems equipped with primary station lines, capable of receiving in-dialed voice and data communications and capable of out-dialing voice and data communications and any customer-premised equipment, software, and installation costs necessary for utilization by the state or local agency. (b) State and local agencies may enter into financing agreements for the procurement of telecommunications services whenever the state or local agency may derive monetary benefit and greater services as a result of its ability to acquire capital at lower interest cost than the supplier of those services can provide directly to the agency or whenever the state or local agency may obtain a reduced cost of service based on length of agreement if offered by the supplier of telecommunications service. (c) Procurement requirements for financing of telecommunications equipment and services shall be considered to have been met whenever the financing is within the scope of public sector requests for proposals or whenever the financing is offered by a sole source provider or that provider's assignee. (d) This section shall not be construed to alter or circumvent any existing procurement procedure or requirement, nor to alter or circumvent the procurement authority of any state or local agency. 11798. (a) The Director of Information Technology shall conduct a feasibility study assessing fiscal, technical, and operational factors to be considered in reforming the state's procurement process from a labor and paper intensive procurement process to an end-to-end all electronic system of on-line procurement whereby data bases of open procurements are made accessible to vendors by computer and modem. A component of the feasibility study shall continue a pilot program established to define the requirements of an end-to-end all electronic procurement system. The feasibility study shall encompass all aspects of procurement, including construction, information technology and telecommunications, commodities, supplies, materials, and physical or consulting services. (b) The feasibility study shall be designed to explore the potential for realizing, through applications of appropriate end-to-end all electronic procurement systems and information technology applications, procurement enhancements that may include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Providing capacity to electronically categorize procurement by approximate dollar value, geography, and due date. (2) Offering ability for immediate access of status of procurements, through posting of completed procurements. (3) Realizing cost savings through a resulting shift from a labor and paper intensive system to an electronic system. (4) Achieving long-term savings in procurements by expanding the network of qualified suppliers through electronic marketing of public contract opportunities. (5) Developing strategies to ensure equitable access to contract opportunities and procurement information to small and emerging business enterprises. (c) The feasibility study shall include recommendations, based on study findings, to validate the requirements and value of an end-to-end all electronic procurement system, and provide for the development of specified data. Study recommendations shall also include a timeline from a pilot phase to full implementation of an electronic system for all aspects of procurement, including construction, electronic data processing and telecommunications, commodities, supplies, materials, and physical or consulting services. (d) The feasibility study shall include consideration of the Controller's prepayment claim audit requirements and identify means to incorporate these requirements into any payment system resulting from this study. (e) The results of the feasibility study shall be submitted, not later than August 1, 1997, to the Governor and the Legislature. 11799. The Legislature finds and declares that, with the advent of deregulation in the telecommunications industry, substantial cost savings can be realized by the state through the specialized evaluation and procurement of alternative telecommunications systems. All contracts for the acquisition of telecommunications services and all contracts for the acquisition of telecommunications goods, whether by lease or purchase, shall be made by, or under the supervision of, the Department of Information Technology. All procurements shall be accomplished in accordance with this chapter, except to the extent any directive or provision is uniquely applicable to information technology acquisitions. The Department of Information Technology shall have responsibility for the establishment of policy and procedures for telecommunications. The Department of Information Technology shall have responsibility for the establishment of tactical policy and procedures for information technology consistent with statewide strategic policy. The Department of Information Technology shall have review and approval responsibility of information technology and telecommunication acquisitions to assure consistency with budgetary objectives. The Trustees of the California State University shall assume the functions of the Department of Information Technology with regard to procurement of telecommunication goods and services by the California State University. The trustees shall grant to the Department of Information Technology an opportunity to bid whenever the university solicits bids for telecommunications goods and services. SEC. 3. Section 11112.3 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 11112.3. (a) The Attorney General shall appoint a RAN Advisory Committee to review the master plan, policy guidelines, and administrative procedures prepared by the department and advise the Attorney General of any modifications the committee deems necessary. Final approval and acceptance of the RAN Advisory Committee proposals shall be made by the Attorney General. (b) The RAN Advisory Committee shall be composed of one representative from each of the following: The League of California Cities, California Peace Officers' Association, California District Attorneys' Association, California Police Chiefs' Association, California State Sheriffs' Association, County Supervisors' Association of California, Department of General Services, Department of Information Technology, and the Department of Justice. The members of the committee shall select a chairperson. The members shall serve without compensation, but reasonable and necessary travel and per diem expenses incurred by committee members shall be reimbursed by the department. The RAN Advisory Committee shall terminate January 1, 1989, unless extended by legislation enacted prior thereto. SEC. 4. Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 12100) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code is repealed. SEC. 5. Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 12120) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code is repealed. SEC. 6. Section 4902 of the Unemployment Insurance Code is amended to read: 4902. The report, required by Section 4901, shall be transmitted to the Legislative Analyst, the Assembly Committees on Insurance, Consumer Protection, Governmental Efficiency, and Economic Development, Labor and Employment, and Ways and Means, the Senate Committees on Industrial Relations and Budget and Fiscal Review, the Department of Finance, and the Governor, on or before February 1 of each even-numbered year. The report shall do all of the following: (a) Provide a strategic information plan that describes the long-term goals and strategies which shall be undertaken by the department to create an information technology environment that will not only support the achievement of the department's strategic business mission and goals but set the foundation for using information technology to make substantial and sustainable improvements in how it conducts business. The plan shall cover a 10-year planning horizon and include the department's information vision, its information management principles, and long-term goals and strategies for achieving its information vision. (b) Provide a tactical information plan of specific automation and infrastructure projects to be undertaken within three years of the date of the report. The plan shall include project description and scope, consistency with the strategic information plan, relationship to other projects, priority of development, estimated project costs and benefits, and improvements in services. For automation projects, it shall also provide reductions in personnel and operating costs, and identification of how personnel and cost savings will be used, transferred, or otherwise accounted for. (c) Not necessarily be in addition to or replace any reports now submitted by the director to the Department of Information Technology. SEC. 7. Section 4903 of the Unemployment Insurance Code is amended to read: 4903. (a) Thirty days prior to the release of the report identified in Section 4901, the director shall submit it to the Department of Information Technology, which shall review and comment on it. These comments shall be attached to the report by the director and distributed with the report. (b) When commenting on the report, the Department of Information Technology shall include, but not be limited to, an assessment of whether: (1) The requirements for the report have been met. (2) The strategic plan is consistent with the formal strategic plan submitted separately to the Office of Information Technology. (3) The costs and benefits identified in the report are consistent with the projects previously submitted for approval or contained in the Information Management Annual Plans.