BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



SENATE RULES COMMITTEE                           SB 1785  
Office of Senate Floor Analyses
1020 N Street, Suite 524
(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) 327-4478
                                                              
                                                          .

                     UNFINISHED BUSINESS
                                                              
                                                          .
  
Bill No:  SB 1785
Author:   Hayden (D), et al
Amended:  8/24/98
Vote:     21
                                                              
                                                             
  .  

  SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  6-2, 4/21/98
AYES:  Burton, Calderon, Lockyer, O'Connell, Schiff, Sher
NOES:  Leslie, Wright
NOT VOTING:  Haynes

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-1, 5/18/98
AYES:  Alpert, Dills, Johnson, Kelley, Leslie, McPherson,  
  Mountjoy
NOES:  Johnston
NOT VOTING:  Burton, Calderon, Hughes, Karnette,  
  Vasconcellos

  SENATE FLOOR  :  24-5, 5/20/98
AYES:  Alpert, Ayala, Burton, Costa, Dills, Greene, Hayden,  
  Hughes, Johannessen, Johnston, Kelley, Kopp, Lockyer,  
  McPherson, O'Connell, Peace, Polanco, Rosenthal, Schiff,  
  Sher, Solis, Thompson, Vasconcellos, Watson
NOES:  Haynes, Hurtt, Knight, Monteith, Wright
NOT VOTING:  Brulte, Calderon, Craven, Johnson, Karnette,  
  Leslie, Lewis, Maddy, Mountjoy, Rainey

  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  72-3, 8/26/98 - See last page for vote
                                                              
                                                          .

SUBJECT  :    Stray animals:  duties of pounds and shelters

  SOURCE  :     Author
                                                              
                                                          .






DIGEST  :    This bill provides that public and private  
animal shelters are subject to the same anti-cruelty  
statutes as private citizens who take possession of a stray  
dog or cat.  It also requires that animal shelters:

1.Keep animals for a minimum of three business days before  
  they are put up for adoption and a minimum of six  
  business days before they are euthanized.

2.Make animals available to non-profit rescue societies or  
  adoption organizations free of charge, excluding  
  reasonable spay or neuter costs.

3.Maintain accurate records of all animals turned over to  
  the shelter, from the time of possession.

4.Keep and provide for any legally ownable pet.

5.Make reasonable efforts to contact the owner of an animal  
  in its possession and to inform him or her of recovery  
  procedures.

In addition, this bill provides that it is the policy of  
the state that no adoptable animal should be euthanized.  

  Assembly Amendments  :

1.Delete $20,000 penalty for violation of the provisions of  
  this bill.

2.Add clarifying language relative to liability.

3.Allow a shelter to charge an adoption fee for a cat.

  ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that a stray dog or cat  
that is impounded must be held for 72 hours before it may  
be killed.  

This bill provides that:

1.Any impounded animal that may be legally owned must be  
  held for six business days before it may be killed.   It  
  provides that an impounded animal would be available for  
  owner redemption during the first three business days and  
  for adoption or owner redemption during the following  
  three business days.

2.It is the policy of the state that no adoptable animal  
  should be euthanized if it can be adopted into a suitable  
  home and that no treatable animal should be euthanized.   





  It defines "adoptable" and "treatable".  The above, by  
  itself, shall not be the basis of liability for damages  
  regarding euthanasia.

3.Any stray dog or cat that is impounded shall, prior to  
  the killing of that animal for any reason other than  
  irremediable suffering, be released to a nonprofit animal  
  rescue or adoption organization if requested by the  
  organization prior to the scheduled killing of that  
  animal.  The pound or shelter may charge an adoption fee  
  not to exceed the standard adoption fee.

  The bill provides that any rabbit, guinea pig, hamster,  
  gerbil, pot-bellied pig, lizard, snake, turtle or  
  tortoise, legally allowed as personal property, fall  
  under the same provisions as for the cats and dogs  
  specified above.

4.Requires any owner relinquished to be kept for two  
  business days before it may be killed.  This particular  
  provision sunsets on January 1, 2001.

Existing law provides that an animal control agency must  
keep records of the whereabouts of any animal in its  
possession for 72 hours and must make those records  
available for inspection by the public upon request.  

This bill provides that an animal control agency or private  
animal shelter must keep accurate records on each animal  
that is taken, medically treated, euthanized, or impounded.  
 It requires that those records include the circumstances  
under which the animal was taken up, medically treated,  
euthanized, or impounded, the names of the personnel who  
took up, medically treated, euthanized, or impounded the  
animal, a description of any medical treatment provided,  
the name of the veterinarian of record, the final  
disposition of the animal, (including the name of the  
person who euthanized the animal or the names of parties  
who adopted the animal).  This bill requires the  
maintenance of those records from the time the agency or  
shelter takes possession of the animal.  

Existing law provides that all animal control agencies and  
private animal shelters must provide owners of lost animals  
and those who find lost animals with a list of lost and  
found animals maintained by the shelter.  It also requires  
that they provide the telephone numbers and addresses of  
other animal control agencies and private animal shelters  
in the area.  These provisions carry neither civil nor  
criminal penalties.






This bill also requires that animal control agencies and  
private animal shelters make reasonable efforts to contact  
the owner of an animal in its possession and to inform him  
or her of recovery procedures.  It requires that animal  
shelters keep records of such efforts. In addition, this  
bill provides that violations of the above cited existing  
law are a cause of action for damages against a public  
entity, employee of a public entity, or any other person.

Existing law provides that local governments may, but are  
not required to, adopt statutory language requiring animal  
control centers to conduct postseizure hearings to  
determine whether the seizure or impounding of an animal  
was lawful.  Existing case law [Carrera v. Bertaini Civ.  
No. 2713. Fifth Dist. Nov. 12, 1976.] provides that animal  
control centers must conduct postseizure hearings.

This bill codifies existing case law to provide that animal  
control centers must conduct postseizure hearings.

The bill makes the following declarations and findings:

  1. Public and private shelters and humane organizations  
    share a common purpose in saving animals' lives,  
    preventing animal suffering, and eliminating animal  
    abandonment. 

  2. Public and private shelters and humane groups should  
    work together to end euthanasia of adoptable and  
    treatable animals by 2010. 

  3. Redemption of owned pets and adoption of lost or stray  
    adoptable animals is preferable to incurring social and  
    economic costs of euthanasia. 

  4. Shelters should be open during hours that permit  
    working pet owners to redeem pets during non-working  
    hours. 

  5. Shelters should aggressively promote spay and neuter  
    programs to reduce pet overpopulation. 

  6. Shelters should not adopt out animals that are not  
    spayed or neutered. 

  7. Public shelters should work with humane animal  
    adoption organizations to the fullest extent possible  
    to promote the adoption of animals and to reduce the  
    rate of killing. 






  8. The intent of this act is to do all of the following: 

    A.    Increase the focus of shelters to owner  
      redemption and adoption by making record keeping  
      mandatory to aid in owner redemption, providing owner  
      relinquished pets the same holding period as stray  
      animals to allow for adoption, and providing for an  
      explicit adoption period. 

    B.    Consolidate and list clear guidelines for care  
      and treatment for animals held in shelters. 

    C.    Extend public shelter responsibilities from dogs  
      and cats to other specified pets.

    D.    Make shelters accountable to pet owners and the  
      public for records and the care of animals in their  
      possession. 

    E.    Make clear shelter responsibilities are the same  
      as those legally assumed by a person who voluntarily  
      picks up an animal. 

  9. Statutory law prescribes the type of treatment that  
    private citizens must extend to stray animals they  
    voluntarily pick up and that public and private animal  
    shelters should be held to the same legal duties as  
    those that exist for private citizens. 

 10. It is better to have public and private shelters pick  
    up or take in animals than private citizens. The  
    Legislature further finds that the taking in of animals  
    is important for public health and safety, to aid in  
    the return of the animal to its owner, and to prevent  
    inhumane conditions for lost or free roaming animals. 

 11. Shelters should be required by law to take in lost  
    animals and properly care for them with prompt  
    veterinary care, adequate nutrition, shelter, exercise,  
    and water. 

 12. Shelters receiving animals that have identification  
    should make reasonable attempts to notify the owner of  
    the animal's location. 

 13. The duties of shelters to properly care for an animal  
    do not cease if the owner of a lost animal does not  
    claim the animal; and the shelter should have the duty  
    to make the animal available for adoption for a  





    reasonable period of time and to care properly for the  
    animal during this period. 

 14. The Legislature finds and declares that lost animals  
    should be held for a period of time to ensure that the  
    owner has proper access to redeem the animal.

The bill provides that the duties imposed by this bill are  
mandatory duties for public entities and for all private  
entities with which the public entity has contracted to  
perform those duties.

  FISCAL EFFECT  :   Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
Local:  Yes

  SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/19/98) (Unable to reverify at time  
of writing)

The Humane Society of the United States
Friends of Animals
The Fund for Animals, Inc.
In Defense of Animals
Animal Emancipation, Inc.
Animal Legislative Action Network
Orange County People for Animals
The Cat and Dog Rescue Association
Cats at the Studios, Inc.
Doris Day Animal League

  OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/19/98) (Unable to reverify at  
time of writing)

California Animal Control Directors Association
California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers  
Association
City of Los Angeles

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
the purpose of this bill is:

1.To make it clear that animal shelters and private  
  individuals have the same responsibility to animals under  
  their care.

2.To reduce the number of adoptable animals euthanized at  
  shelters by shifting the focus of shelters from killing  
  to owner redemption and adoption.

3.To give owner relinquished pets the same chance to live  
  as stray animals by providing for uniform holding  





  periods.

4.To establish clearer guidelines for the care and  
  treatment of animals in shelters.

5.To require shelters to care for all pets.  

The author's office argues that too many adoptable animals  
are euthanized by shelters and that the proposed changes  
will decrease the frequency of this tragedy.  Further, the  
author argues that taxpayers who own legally allowed pets  
other than cats and dogs should be treated the same as  
taxpayers who own cats and dogs.  

  ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The principal opponents of this  
bill, the California Association of Animal Control  
Directors and The California Agricultural Commissioners and  
Sealers Association have expressed numerous concerns.

Opponents argue that the provisions in this bill which  
require that shelters keep animals for a minimum of six  
business days would dramatically increase operating costs.   
Pat Claerbout, Director of El Dorado County Animal Control,  
points out that the six business day requirement would  
necessitate the holding of animals for a minimum of up to  
eight days, since weekends do not constitute business days.  
 During the holidays, shelters could be required to hold  
animals for as long as eleven or twelve days.  Claerbout  
argues that in order to meet this provision, most shelters  
would be forced to expand their facilities and hire  
additional staff.

Opponents further argue that the requirement that shelters  
release animals to rescue societies as soon as they are  
available for adoption will create a "cherry picking  
problem" whereby rescue societies and adoption  
organizations could frequently remove all easily adoptable  
animals from the shelters, leaving only unadoptable animals  
in the shelters.  Claerbout argues that shelters need to be  
able to retain some of the easily adoptable animals so that  
they can entice the public to visit shelters.  Higher  
numbers of visitors results in more frequent adoptions of  
less easily adoptable animals.  Further, opponents of the  
bill argue that the requirement that shelters release  
animals to rescue societies and adoption organizations for  
free will decrease their revenues. 

Opponents are concerned that the requirement that animal  
control centers conduct postseizure hearings will increase  
operating costs.






Opponents also argue that shelters currently maintain  
adequate records of impounded animals and that they are  
already subject to anti-                          cruelty  
statutes.


RJG:cm  8/27/98  Senate Floor Analyses
              SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE
                      ****  END  ****