BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                             


 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 171|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
|(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
|327-4478                          |                         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
  
                              
                    UNFINISHED BUSINESS
                              

Bill No:  SB 171
Author:   Escutia (D), et al
Amended:  8/16/99
Vote:     21

  
  SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE  :   6-3, 4/21/99
AYES:   Speier, Escutia, Figueroa, Hughes, Schiff, Sher
NOES:   Johnston, Leslie, Lewis
NOT VOTING:   Johnson

  SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-3, 5/27/99
AYES:  Johnston, Alpert, Burton, Escutia, Johnson,  
  Karnette, McPherson, Perata, Vasconcellos
NOES:  Kelley, Leslie, Mountjoy
NOT VOTING:  Bowen

  SENATE FLOOR  :  24-12, 6/1/99
AYES:  Alarcon, Alpert, Baca, Bowen, Burton, Costa, Dunn,  
  Escutia, Figueroa, Hayden, Hughes, Johnson, Johnston,  
  McPherson, Murray, O'Connell, Ortiz, Peace, Perata,  
  Polanco, Schiff, Sher, Speier, Vasconcellos
NOES:  Brulte, Haynes, Kelley, Knight, Leslie, Lewis,  
  Monteith, Morrow, Mountjoy, Poochigian, Rainey, Wright
NOT VOTING:  Chesbro, Johannessen, Karnette, Solis

  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  43-30, 8/23/99 - See last page for vote
 

  SUBJECT  :    Automobile insurance:  lifeline policies

  SOURCE  :     Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights

 
                                                 CONTINUED





                                                      SB 171
                                                       Page  
2

  DIGEST  :   This bill makes legislative findings and  
declarations with respect to the need for lifeline auto  
insurance policies for low-income drivers.

  Assembly Amendments  make the bill only legislative findings  
and declarations which has the effect of making the bill go  
into Conference Committee.

NOTE:  Senate Appropriations Committee staff indicates this  
bill, along with SB 527 (Speier) and SB 652 (Speier), will  
be going to Conference.


  ANALYSIS  :   Existing law:


1.Requires motorists to demonstrate financial  
  responsibility by one of various means, including an  
  automobile liability insurance policy.  

2.Specifies minimum coverages for the policy of $15,000 for  
  bodily injury to, or death of, one person, $30,000 for  
  bodily injury to, or death of, all persons, and $5,000  
  for property damage (15/30/5).

3.Requires insurers to participate in a plan, known as the  
  assigned risk plan, to provide automobile liability  
  insurance to those otherwise unable to obtain it.

  Background  

On April 7, 1999, the Senate Rules Committee discussed a  
request by the Senate Insurance Committee to hire an  
actuary to assist in the evaluation of proposals regarding  
low cost auto insurance.  The Senate Rules Committee agreed  
to hire an actuary, contracted through the Senate Office of  
Research (SOR), and it directed that the staff of authors  
of various auto insurance bills, the SOR, and the Senate  
Rules Committee meet to make recommendations for the scope  
of the actuary's work and the timing of the report. 

The State Department of Insurance (DOI) recently estimated  
that about 22% of all California drivers are uninsured.   
While this rate was estimated to be down from 28% as of  







                                                      SB 171
                                                       Page  
3

1996, the figure still represents several million who are  
in violation of the law and unable to pay for the damages  
they may cause while driving.  


In 1998, the DOI also conducted a random sample telephone  
study of persons who have uninsured vehicles.  Among the  
findings of this lengthy study, the DOI concluded that 58%  
of the uninsured had an interest in a  
"low-cost/low-coverage" (LCLC) policy, and that 45% of  
those presently insured with minimum limits coverage would  
also be interested in a LCLC policy.  Of all drivers who  
were uninsured and who said that insurance cost too much,  
57% expressed an interest in a LCLC policy if the price was  
reduced 10% from the price they believed was being charged  
for insurance.  On average, these persons estimated that  
currently-available insurance would cost them about $597  
for six month's coverage.  


The report also indicated that, "Demographically, the  
uninsured had a higher likelihood [than insured drivers] of  
being a home renter, having an income of less than $20,000,  
being in the 18 to 24 age group, having a high school or  
less education, being male, being Hispanic or Black, and  
having lived in their present home for a shorter period of  
time."  The report also indicated, however, that persons  
who were "pure uninsured" (no vehicle in the house was  
insured) were more likely to be female, not employed,  
single, and to speak a language other than English in the  
household, than were the "hybrid uninsured" (at least one  
of two vehicles insured in house).


On February 17, 1999, the DOI released a report on the  
annual premium price paid by good drivers for 15/30/5  
coverage in the 40 zip codes with the highest uninsured  
rates, based upon data from five of the top ten insurers in  
California.  The DOI based its report on actual annual  
premiums paid by good drivers as of the end of 1998, drawn  
from DOI data gathered from insurers under the authority of  
the Commissioner.









                                                      SB 171
                                                       Page  
4

In Los Angeles (22 of the 40 zip codes), the report  
indicated that the 50th percentile price paid by consumers  
varied from a low of $458 in zip 90022 to a high of $961  
paid by consumers in zip code 90005.  The low vs. high  
range for the 10th percentile purchasers in the study  
varied from a low of $218 in zip code 90022 (10% paid this  
price or less in this zip code) to a high of $452 in zip  
code 90005 (10% paid this price or less in zip code 90005).  
 The low vs. high range for the 90th percentile prices in  
the study indicated that 90% of all consumers paid $660 or  
less in zip code 90021, while at the high end of this range  
$1,796 or less was paid by 90% of all consumers in zip code  
90005.  

  Related Legislation

  SB 519, SB 527, SB 944, SB 1213, and AB 976.

  FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
Local:  No

  SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/23/99)

The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (source)
The Attorney General's Office
Oakland Tribune
Sacramento Bee
San Jose Mercury News
Pasadena Star News
ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform  
Now)
Alexandria House Homeless Shelter
Americans for Democratic Action
CALPIRG
Consumer Action
Consumer's Union
Feminist Majority-Kathy Spillar, National Coordinator
First African Methodist Episcopalian Church
HERE (Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees), Local 814
Hollywood Urban Project
Jobs for a Future
LA Alliance for a New Economy
Proyecto Pastroal at Delores Mission
SEIU (Service Employees International Union), Local 660 and  







                                                      SB 171
                                                       Page  
5

Local 1877
Southern Christian Leadership Conference
Alliance of American Insurers
Insurance Agents and Brokers Legislative Council
Association of California Insurance Companies
Professional Insurance Agents of California and Nevada

  OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/23/99)

This bill was amended to state legislative findings.  No  
opposition has been registered on this current version.

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :   According to the author and the  
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, sponsors of  
this bill, California is an urbanized state in which public  
transit is limited and often expensive, thus making driving  
essential.  The purpose of this bill is to create an  
affordable, lifeline insurance policy that allows eligible  
low-income, very good and good drivers to meet their  
essential driving and household needs, while also complying  
with California's financial responsibility law.  
 
  ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :     
  
  ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  43-30, 8/23/99
AYES:  Alquist, Aroner, Bock, Cardenas, Cedillo, Corbett,  
  Correa, Davis, Ducheny, Dutra, Firebaugh, Floyd,  
  Gallegos, Havice, Hertzberg, Honda, Jackson, Keeley,  
  Knox, Kuehl, Lempert, Longville, Lowenthal, Machado,  
  Mazzoni, Migden, Nakano, Papan, Romero, Scott, Shelley,  
  Soto, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Thomson, Torlakson,  
  Vincent, Washington, Wayne, Wesson, Wildman, Wright,  
  Villaraigosa
NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Baldwin, Bates, Battin, Baugh,  
  Brewer, Briggs, Campbell, Cardoza, Cunneen, Dickerson,  
  Frusetta, Granlund, House, Kaloogian, Leach, Leonard,  
  Maddox, Maldonado, Margett, McClintock, Olberg, Oller,  
  Robert Pacheco, Pescetti, Runner, Strickland, Thompson,  
  Zettel
NOT VOTING:  Ashburn, Calderon, Cox, Florez, Rod Pacheco,  
  Reyes, Wiggins


DLW:jk  8/23/99   Senate Floor Analyses 







                                                      SB 171
                                                       Page  
6


               SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                      ****  END  ****