BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS COMMITTEE
Senator Ray Haynes, Chair
BILL NO: ACA 15 HEARING: June 20, 2002
AUTHOR: Howard Wayne FISCAL: No
VERSION: April 2, 2002 CHIEF COUNSEL: Scott Johnson
REFERRED: Sen Jud (6-0) 6/11/02
Court Consolidation
SUMMARY
Sponsored by the California Law Review Commission, this measure
would amend California's Constitution to delete obsolete
references to the municipal courts as part of the State's trial
court structure.
BACKGROUND
Municipal courts have been eliminated in California subsequent
to the passage of SCA 4 of 1996 approved by the voters as
Proposition 220 on the June 2, 1998 ballot. That measure
provided that the municipal and superior courts within a county
shall be unified upon a majority vote of the superior court
judges and a majority vote of the municipal court judges within
each county pursuant to Article VI, Section 5(e) of the
Constitution. By July 2001 all 58 counties had merged their
superior and municipal courts. However, various references
remain in the State Constitution and this measure will delete
those obsolete references as well as make conforming and related
changes.
ANALYSIS
This proposed constitutional amendment would:
1. Delete a reference to municipal courts in Section 1 of
Article VI of the Constitution, vesting the judicial power of
the state in its various courts.
2. Repeal Section 5 of Article VI of the Constitution governing
the organization of the municipal courts.
3. Provide that the Judicial Council shall consist of the Chief
Justice, one other judge of the Supreme Court, three judges of
courts of appeal, ten judges of superior courts, two nonvoting
court administrators and any other nonvoting members as
determined by the voting membership of the Council, each
appointed by the Chief Justice for a three year term; four
members of the State Bar appointed by its governing body for
three year terms, and one member of each house of the
Legislature appointed as provided by the house.
4. Provide that the Commission on Judicial Performance consists
of one judge of a court of appeal and two judges of superior
courts, each appointed by the Supreme Court; two members of the
State Bar of California who have practiced law for 10 years,
appointed by the Governor, and six citizens who are not judges,
retired judges, or members of the State Bar, two appointed by
the Governor, two by the Senate Rules Committee, and two by the
Speaker of the Assembly.
5. Eliminate a reference to original jurisdiction for trial
courts other than superior courts.
6. Eliminate provisions setting standards for eligibility to be
a municipal court judge.
7. Eliminate provisions regarding election of municipal court
judges; and
8. Create a sunset date of January 1, 2007 for transitional
provisions governing the implementation of the unification of
municipal and superior courts. These provisions govern the
transition of the courts' employees, records, and proceedings.
COMMENTS
A two-thirds (2/3) vote of each house and majority of the voters
must approve this non-controversial amendment to the
Constitution. The author hopes to place ACA 15 on the November
5, 2002 ballot. The Secretary of the State has established June
27, 2002 as the deadline for measures to qualify for the
November ballot.
NOTE: Statutory cleanup to trial court consolidation is
embodied in SB 1316 (Senate Judiciary Committee bill) currently
pending in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
SUPPORT
California Law Revision Commission (Sponsor)
OPPOSITION
None know