BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 25, 2001

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
                                 Paul Koretz, Chair
                 AB 856 (Wesson) - As Introduced:  February 22, 2001
           
          SUBJECT  :   Horse racing.

           SUMMARY  :   Establishes a legal framework for collective  
          bargaining for racetrack backstretch employees.   Requires  
          trainers to maintain certified payroll records, and establishes  
          a payroll audit program by the Labor Commissioner.  Establishes  
          a program to adopt and enforce standards for housing provided to  
          backstretch employees at licensed racetracks. Specifically,  this  
          bill  :  

          1)Establishes a system for collective bargaining for racetrack  
            backstretch, based on the Legislatures findings, among others,  
            that the National Labor Relations Board has formally declined  
            to assert jurisdiction over horse racing.

          2)Provides that California Horse Racing Board (Board) shall  
            oversee the conduct of a union recognition procedure for  
            backstretch employees, as specified.

          3)Provides for the right to organize.  Prohibits organizations  
            of trainers or horsemen from using funds from pari-mutuel  
            wagering to advocate any position with respect to  
            unionization.  Prohibits coercion and retaliation by employers  
            and employees.  Provides a union reasonable access, as  
            specified, to backstretch employees.

          4)Requires the Board to provide the union a list, as specified,  
            of backstretch employees.  Establishes a procedure for a labor  
            union to request Board recognition as the exclusive bargaining  
            agent for backstretch employees upon collection of signed  
            cards from a majority of the workers in a defined bargaining  
            unit.  When a union claims to represent a majority of the  
            employees in such a unit, a neutral party must be selected by  
            the Board to validate the employee authorization cards  
            submitted by the union.  Upon the validation of these cards,  
            the Board must recognize that union as the collective  
            bargaining agent for those workers.

          5)Establishes a procedure for the Board to conduct an election  








                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  2

            among employer trainers for the selection of an agent to  
            represent the interests of the trainers in a multiemployer  
            agreement.  Establishes a procedure for a trainer to opt out  
            of a multi-employer bargaining procedure, but if a majority of  
            his/her employees indicate a desire to join a union, the  
            trainer must bargain in good faith.  If less than a majority  
            of the trainers' workers express a desire to join a union, the  
            trainer is not subject to the bargaining order, but the  
            workers have one year to get a majority of the employees to  
            sign union authorization cards.

          6)The bill provides for a decertification process for employees  
            that no longer desire to be represented by the union.

          7)Allows for a labor union and organization of trainers or  
            horsemen to enter into a mutually acceptable agreement that  
            may substitute for the provisions of this bill.  This bill,  
            however, does not require that parties enter into any labor  
            agreement, provided each party is negotiating in a good faith  
            effort to reach an agreement.
          8)Authorizes the Board to require the parties to submit to  
            binding arbitration, or to contract with state mediation and  
            conciliation services relating to this issue, in the event of  
            an impasse in labor negotiations.  

          9)Requires the Board to provide that labor agreements under  
            these provisions are binding upon every applicable licensee.   
            Provides that a horseman or trainer who has a separate  
            agreement with the union shall not be required to be a party  
            to a multiemployer collective bargaining agreement.

          10)Requires the Labor Commissioner (Commissioner) to notify the  
            Board of any labor violations by a licensee committed during  
            the course of such licensed activity, and includes labor law  
            violations as a condition that may be considered by the Board  
            in the suspension or revocation of a license.

          11)Requires trainers to keep accurate payroll records of their  
            employees that would be available for review by the  
            Commissioner and the employee, as specified.  Except for  
            trainers covered by a collective bargaining agreement, the  
            Board must require, as a condition of licensure, that copies  
            of certified payroll records be filed with the Board.   
            Requires the Commissioner to establish a program to audit  
            these records at least once every three years to ensure  








                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  3

            compliance. 

          12)Requires the Board to develop housing standards that protect  
            the health and safety and general welfare of the backstretch  
            workers living at the racetrack and the horses in their care.   
             Prohibits the Board from licensing racing associations to  
            conduct a race meeting until an inspection has taken place to  
            ensure compliance with the housing requirements.  Requires an  
            annual inspection is required to be conducted by Board in  
            conjunction with either the Department of Housing and  
            Community Development or the appropriate local housing   
            authority.

          13)Provides that when a statewide majority of backstretch  
            workers choose to be represented by a union, either the  
            horsemen owners or trainers, where appropriate, must submit a   
            plan to the Board for the administration of the existing  
            pension program by a joint labor-management committee.  This  
            bill additionally requires the existing health and welfare  
            fund board to be expanded to include two holders of  
            backstretch employee licenses, or, if there is a union, two  
            union representatives.

          14) Redirects an additional 30 % of charity racing day proceeds  
            to be distributed to charities associated with the horse  
            racing industry.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Provides that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has  
            declined jurisdiction over the horse racing industry.

          2)Establishes the Commissioner as Chief of the Division of Labor  
            Standards Enforcement in California, with specified duties to  
            enforce laws regarding wages, hours, and working conditions of  
            employees.

          3)Requires the Board to license and regulate horseracing  
            industry in California, and requires the licensure of various  
            persons and entities associated with this industry.

          4)Imposes specified requirements on the operation of racetracks  
            and backstretch facilities, and establishes pension funds and  
            welfare funds for the benefit of backstretch personnel and  
            horsemen.








                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  4


           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)This bill establishes a program to permit backstretch workers  
            to participate in collective bargaining, and enacts new  
            provisions to improve enforcement of labor laws and housing  
            conditions for backstretch workers. 

          2)The Los Angeles Times, and other media, reported in 2000 on  
            widespread labor law violations and substandard housing  
            conditions  for racetrack backstretch workers.  This  
            Committee, along with the Committee on Governmental  
            Organization, held a joint informational hearing on these  
            issues.  The Labor Commissioner and other witnesses  
            corroborated the media reports of labor law violations and  
            substandard housing conditions.

          3)AB 2760 (Wesson) from 2000 contained identical language to  
            this bill.  However, AB 2760 also contained an authorization  
            for account wagering on the internet.   AB 2760 passed, but  
            was vetoed by the Governor who stated:  "This bill would amend  
            current statute to allow Internet and telephone wagering on  
            horse races and add various provisions to govern those  
            activities.  The bill would also provide new protections for  
            racetrack "backstretch" employees including badly needed  
            standards for living conditions such as housing, establishment  
            of a health and welfare fund, and the right to organize for  
            collective bargaining purposes. If this bill contained only  
            the backstretch provisions, I would sign it.  However, I  
            cannot support the provisions lifting the State ban on  
            Internet and telephone wagering."   AB 2760 was the product of  
            extensive negotiations involving labor organizations, racing  
            associations, owners and trainers.

          4)Backstretch workers are not presently represented by a union,  
            nor are they afforded any of the protections accorded by both  
            the National Labor Relations Act and the state Agricultural  
            Relations Act.   Backstretch workers are generally employees  
            of trainers who take care of the horses, and are classified as  
            grooms, exercise riders, and hotwalkers.  It is estimated that  
            there are approximately 3,500 backstretch workers employed at  
            California's racetracks.









                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  5

          5)Supporters state that AB 856 will improve labor and housing  
            conditions for backstretch workers at California racetracks.   
            It provides for a fair and equitable system of card-check  
            recognition for union representation of backstretch workers.   
            It also provides for trainers to keep certified payroll  
            records, as is required of public works contractors.  It   
            provides that pensions and health and welfare funds now  
            existing in the industry will be managed in accordance with  
            applicable federal laws.   For too long these low paid  
            immigrant workers have been hidden from the public view and  
            ignored by state and local agencies. 

          6)Opponents argue that this bill could place an excessive burden  
            on California's racing industry by potentially making it more  
            costly for trainers and owners to train and own horses in  
            California.  The trainers' organization notes that they were  
            neutral on last year's AB 2760 due to the inclusion of the  
            account wagering authorization, which would have produced  
            additional wagering revenues for the various segments of the  
            racing industry.  Opponents also contend that the majority  
            card check means of organizing, as opposed to an election,  
            unfairly favors a union in any such organizing campaign.  
            Opponents also object to the provisions in the bill that place  
            additional payroll reporting and auditing requirements on  
            trainers that are not subject to a collective bargaining  
            agreement.

          7)Opponents have also raised concerns about the propriety of  
            requiring the Board to provide the union a list of   
            backstretch employees, that includes information relating to  
            license type, employer, addresses and telephone numbers, and  
            location of employment.  Supporters state that similar  
            procedures are followed under collective bargaining statutes  
            including the National Labor Relations Act and the  
            Agricultural Labor Relations Act.   


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
          Jockey's Guild









                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  6

           Opposition 
           
          Bay Meadows
          California Thoroughbred Breeders Association
          California Thoroughbred Trainers
          Golden Gate Fields
          Santa Anita Park
          Thoroughbred Owners of California

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Ralph Lightstone / L. & E. / (916)  
          319-2091