BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 16, 2001

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                              Carole Migden, Chairwoman

                    AB 856 (Wesson) - As Amended:  April 30, 2001 

          Policy Committee:                              Governmental  
          Organization Vote:                            12-4
                        Labor and Employment                    4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill:

          1)Establishes a system for collective bargaining for racetrack  
            backstretch employees and directs the California Horse Racing  
            Board (CHRB) to oversee a union recognition procedure.

          2)Requires the Labor Commissioner to notify the CHRB of any  
            labor violations by a licensee and includes such violations as  
            a condition that may be considered in the suspension or  
            revocation of a license. 

          3)Requires trainers to keep accurate payroll records of their  
            employees that would be available for review by the  
            commissioner and the employee, as specified, and requires the  
            commissioner to establish a program to audit trainers' payroll  
            records to ensure compliance with the Labor Code and  
            applicable wage orders.  All trainers are to be audited within  
            the first four years after the measure take effects, and at  
            least 15 percent are to be audited annually thereafter.

          4)Requires the CHRB to develop housing standards that protect  
            the health and safety and general welfare of the backstretch  
            workers living at the racetrack and the horses in their care. 

          5)Prohibits the board from licensing racing associations to  
            conduct a race meeting until an inspection has taken place to  
            ensure compliance with the housing requirements, and requires  
            an annual inspection by the board in conjunction with either  
            the Department of Housing and Community Development or the  








                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  2

            appropriate local housing authority.

          6)Authorizes the board to assess a fee on racing associations to  
            cover the costs of the housing inspections.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)The Department of Industrial Relations will incur General Fund  
            costs of around $250,000 annually to perform the audits in the  
            initial four years and annual costs of around $150,000  
            thereafter.  

          2)The CHRB will incur one-time costs of about $30,000 to update  
            its computer system in order to maintain required information  
            on backstretch employees.  

          3)The CHRB will incur ongoing costs of about $85,000 for the  
            employee housing inspections.  These costs could be offset by  
            fees if the board elects to impose the fee.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  .  "Backstretch" workers are not presently  
            represented by a union, nor are they afforded any of the  
            protections accorded by both the National Labor Relations Act  
            and the state Agricultural Relations Act.  Backstretch workers  
            are generally employees of trainers who take care of the  
            horses, and are classified as grooms, exercise riders, and  
            hotwalkers.  It is estimated that there are approximately  
            3,500 backstretch workers employed at California's racetracks.  


           2)Purpose  .  In response to a series of media reports that  
            detailed labor violations and substandard housing conditions  
            at California's racetracks, the author and supporters of this  
            bill developed this proposal to address a number of issues  
            affecting the California racing industry.  The media reports  
            suggested that some of these workers are not being properly  
            compensated regarding minimum wage and overtime payments, and  
            often live in equipment rooms not designed for residency.   
            These reports have been confirmed by the Labor Commissioner  
            and housing inspectors.

           3)Prior Legislation  .  Last year, AB 2760 (Wesson) contained  
            identical language, but also contained an authorization for  








                                                                  AB 856
                                                                  Page  3

            account wagering, which was intended to help the state's  
            racing industry capture wagering revenue lost to out-of-state  
            and offshore betting systems.  The governor vetoed that bill,   
            objecting to the expanded wagering provisions.  The governor  
            stated, however, that he would sign a bill that contained only  
            the backstretch provisions.

           4)Opposition  .  The associations of trainers, breeders, and  
            owners are opposed to the bill. Opponents argue that this bill  
            could place an excessive burden on California's racing  
            industry by potentially making it more costly for trainers and  
            owners to train and own horses in California.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)319-2081